JULY Stundie Finals (the 2013 version)

[Elizabeth I]

A matter of months? This guy either doesn't know how monarchies work, or doesn't know how babies work.

You're right! I completely missed the implications of that.

 

[billdun262]

I think my favorite part of that one is the more subtle Stundieness here:




A matter of months? This guy either doesn't know how monarchies work, or doesn't know how babies work.

I have it on good authority that the illuminati are planning to use some secret growth serum to make the young prince an adult in a few months. Then they plan to kill off his three relatives who stand between him and the throne. Then he will declare Martian Law(he secretly is one of those vile Martian Jews).

 

[LSSBB]

I have it on good authority that the illuminati are planning to use some secret growth serum to make the young prince an adult in a few months. Then they plan to kill off his three relatives who stand between him and the throne. Then he will declare Martian Law(he secretly is one of those vile Martian Jews).

No need, lizards grow quick.

 

[JamesB]

#7 Possibly the first Stundie ever refuted by a Seinfeld joke.

Jerry: "What percentage of people would you say are good-looking?"

Elaine: "Twenty-five percent?"

Jerry: "Twenty-five percent?"

Elaine: "Um-hmm."

Jerry: "No way! It's like four-to-six percent. It's a 20-to-1 shot."

Elaine: "You're way off."

Jerry: "Way off?"

Elaine: "Yeah."

Jerry: "Have you been to the motor vehicle bureau? It's a leper colony down there."

Elaine: "So, basically, what you're saying is 95 percent of the population is un-date-able?"

Jerry: "Un-date-able!"

Elaine: "Then how are all these people getting together?"

Jerry: "Alcohol."

 

[Safe-Keeper]

To be fair, #3 is unfounded. WTCDust is using Minecraft as an illustration of the Ground Zero scene only, and does not intend to simulate anything. She's made this clear repeatedly in her thread. The "OMG ur using miencraft as a fysics programme" impression is a strawman.

 

[Safe-Keeper]

Trying to decipher this one:

well people certainly have learned to cope with it [full moon sleep disturbances] in the northern hemisphere, they get 6 months continuous darkness and 6 months continuous daylight. So no harm there, is there.
whoever is dishing this crap out out fails again.

Am I right if I think it says something like "it's OK that northerners get six months of darkness, because eventually they learn to cope with all the light from the full moon"?

Okay, the "six months of darkness" thing I almost get, but is (s)he implying we also get six months of full moon (the bracket-edit doesn't exactly make it easier to understand), or that darknes is good, but moonlight is bad?

 

[Orphia Nay]

Damn, I just realised I should have voted for #14.
How could I miss voting for "Less gravity = anti-gravity"??

 

[Travis]

I think my favorite part of that one is the more subtle Stundieness here:




A matter of months? This guy either doesn't know how monarchies work, or doesn't know how babies work.

Well if takes the throne in 50 years that would be 600 months away. So is 600 a matter of months?

Trying to decipher this one:Am I right if I think it says something like "it's OK that northerners get six months of darkness, because eventually they learn to cope with all the light from the full moon"?

Okay, the "six months of darkness" thing I almost get, but is (s)he implying we also get six months of full moon (the bracket-edit doesn't exactly make it easier to understand), or that darknes is good, but moonlight is bad?

Only thing I can figure on is that the assumption is that it is light when there shouldn't be light that is causing the effect.