July 2008 Stundies

"That sounds like a confession to me! In fact, the double negative has turned to proof positive; I'm afraid you gave yourself away!"

Heh... I love Clue... and Tim Curry RULES.
 
"That sounds like a confession to me! In fact, the double negative has turned to proof positive; I'm afraid you gave yourself away!"

Heh... I love Clue... and Tim Curry RULES.
"Are you trying to make me look stupid in front of the other guests?"

"You don't need any help from me, sir."

"That's right!"
 
More wisdom from Turbofan:

Turbofan said:
I don't ignore other data, however nobody here has touched upon the
following:

- The small entry hole into the Pentagon
- Norman Mineta's testimony against Cheney
- E4-B video by CNN
- Lack of significant plane debris
- Lack of serial identification of plane debris
- Incorrect date on Pentagon video

My favorite part, though....:p

Turbofan said:
My understanding of the FDR function and data transfer is mountains over
anyone here. Like I said, I've shown everyone with documentation from
L3 Communications and ARINC 717 why Anti's thoery is wrong.

What do you have to hold onto now?
 
I've got one from Christophera on Myspace.

(Over there he's called Chris):

Christophera said:
Of course you have no theory that is feasible. No one does, so in your impotence, all you can do is "text up", with nonsense.

It's in response to my C&P link, although I don't know if people who have never encountered him will find it funny.
 
It's the heat. In the same way Truthers don't do much when it's raining, snowing, cold, looks like it might be cold, windy, breezy or calm with clear skies they also don't do much when it's hot.
 
Last edited:
The Facebook group "there is no 9/11 conspiracy you morons" is a hotbed for Stundies. I found this quote from one of the truthers there that made me laugh

Paul Noturslave Van Stoken said:
the fact that u think u have evidence means ur an idiot

 
Because witnesses are subjective and it would lead to a logical impossibility if we took the statements literally.

Because witnesses are subjective and it would lead to a logical impossibility if we took the statements literally.

Of course you don't. You and other Jrefers have a propensity to miss the crux of the matter.



Said while attempting to debunk Reheat's calculations about the turns that would be required to fly any flightpath consistent with CIT's flyover theory - the whole point of which was to demonstrate that their theory, in relying on witness testimony, requires an impossibility!
 
From the frontpage of the Facebook group '9/11 Truth Movement'

Joseph Pierce said:
Dude you are arguing with a SCIENCE MAJOR...i know everything there is to know about Physics, Chemistry, Biology and even Earth Sciences. And I am telling you..........Molten Metal MOLTEN METAL...JUST LISTEN TO THE NAME....MOLTEN....MOLTEN......VERY HOT......HOTTER THAN JET FUEL....JET FUEL BURNS AT 2000 DEGREES MAX.....METAL MELTS AT 4000 DEGREES.....so lets say your stupid structure failure was true...that means fire would have to burn floor after floor after floor after floor..and there were a lot of floors in the WTC....and I would say it would take a lot longer than 56 and 102 minutes to burn all of that steel.

34e9ekj.jpg



...he also goes on to say

"I'm way to educated bro so stop its for your own dignity"
 
From the frontpage of the Facebook group '9/11 Truth Movement'



[qimg]http://i34.tinypic.com/34e9ekj.jpg[/qimg]


...he also goes on to say

"I'm way to educated bro so stop its for your own dignity"

Definitely a contendah.

burn, melt, phase transitions: it's all the same when you know everything about physics, chemistry, biology, and earth science...
 
...he also goes on to say

"I'm way to educated bro so stop its for your own dignity"

Oh man, it seems he is also too educated to realize the benefit of a proof read. Still at my college there are a slew of science majors that believe in intelligent design and one of the professors "pwned" me on Facebook for being critical of the local Ghost Hunters group. Needless to say, being a "science major" doesn't make you right.

Stundie material all the way.
 
Oh man, it seems he is also too educated to realize the benefit of a proof read. Still at my college there are a slew of science majors that believe in intelligent design and one of the professors "pwned" me on Facebook for being critical of the local Ghost Hunters group. Needless to say, being a "science major" doesn't make you right.

Stundie material all the way.

Whattenhell is a "Science Major"?
Is that sorta like "University Studies" ?
 
Only three pages! Looks like a slow month for the Truth!

Things are looking up for Teh Stundies since the pfffft boys are actively pursueing the woo in the 9-11 section!:D

From TheLoneBedouin:
I have never analyzed FDR data. I don't know if any FDR data was recovered from the Pentagon- for that I would need to know the chain of evidence.
The FDR data provided by FOIA does not seem to be from the Pentagon since it places the plane NOC.
 
Whattenhell is a "Science Major"?
Is that sorta like "University Studies" ?
I know. I like it when people describe themselves in very generic terms, which is amusing because any of the "science majors" I know that made it past freshman year refer to themselves by their specific area of study. I usually call b.s. on internet "science majors".
 
I'm a human biology major...

This kid's either a freshman or is just accepted into university and extremely hot-headed for getting accepted. I wonder what his attitude towards life will be in one year's time...
 
Turbofan is on a roll:
All of the evidence is on teh interwebs!
All I have to tell you is that AA77 didn't hit the Pentagon. That's proven
by the photo links, and FDR.
Ok...so maybe a little stale....:o
 

Back
Top Bottom