I was going to email this question to Randi but I realise that he is very busy and that it's very possible that another JREFer can provide me with the answer.
When reference is made to the mystery donor who gave the funds to establish JREF, it is very often assumed that person is a skeptic who wishes to expose the paranormal as one great big con.
But it seems to me that it's equally possible that person is a believer who would very much like to see proof of paranormal ability. If I was a wealthy person who believed in the paranormal but would like some kind of evidence to validate my beliefs, it would make no sense whatsoever to ask fellow-believers to provide me with that proof - their motives for doing so would always be suspect; but I could be pretty confident that any proof which came via the JREF challenge was legitimate, couldn't I?
So has Randi ever mentioned whether the mystery donor is a skeptic, a believer, or undecided?
When reference is made to the mystery donor who gave the funds to establish JREF, it is very often assumed that person is a skeptic who wishes to expose the paranormal as one great big con.
But it seems to me that it's equally possible that person is a believer who would very much like to see proof of paranormal ability. If I was a wealthy person who believed in the paranormal but would like some kind of evidence to validate my beliefs, it would make no sense whatsoever to ask fellow-believers to provide me with that proof - their motives for doing so would always be suspect; but I could be pretty confident that any proof which came via the JREF challenge was legitimate, couldn't I?
So has Randi ever mentioned whether the mystery donor is a skeptic, a believer, or undecided?