It's not really arrogance with the debunkers. Arrogance implies some kind of knowledge about something. It's cowardly belligerence at best.
Let me ask you a question. I don't know your field of expertise. But I'll inflict mathematics upon you.
You know math. You've studied it, acquired ability in it, use it or teach it.
You get into a discussion with a non-math adept person, who asserts that 2+2=22. And he has his unshakable (& obvious) self-generated technique that he claims is right.
Is your assertion that 2+2=4 "arrogant"?
Is your assertion that 2+2 can not possibly be 22 "arrogant"?
If you point out to him that every math expert & every math textbook in the world says "4", is that arrogant?
If you listen to his argument, and point out where he is going off track, but he rejects everything you say as part of giant New Math Order conspiracy, and you tell him that he is being silly & paranoid, is that arrogant?
Where, in your opinion, is the line between "self-assured because you know what you what you are talking about" and "arrogant"?
Or do you concede that 2+2 might be 22?
Tom
Last edited:


