JONES new paper:Microspheres and Temperatures

[Gravy]

Go ahead, Sizzler: prove the tour guide wrong.

Do it.

 

[Sizzler]

Since you repeatedly failed to name another formula, we'll stick with the one we know.

Name whatever 29% catalyst you like. Sizzler, WHERE DID IT GO?

Excuse me? You are pursuing the claim that thermate destroyed the WTC skyscrapers.

It's your claim. I have repeatedly asked you to contact the experts, and held your hand through the process of identifying them.

It is abundantly what you won't do. It is abundantly clear that you are as intellectually cowardly as the creeps you admire.

No, my claim is this.

1. Thermate can refer to thermite+sulfur

2. By-products of therm?te reaction can cause sulfidation.

Perhaps you need to re-read the original thread.

 

[Sizzler]

Go ahead, Sizzler: prove the tour guide wrong.

Do it.

Perhaps some other "creeps" will do it. Time will tell Gravy.

 

[Gravy]

Perhaps some other "creeps" will do it. Time will tell Gravy.

Ah, but they won't, Sizzler, because they're intellectual cowards. Don't you get it? The people you follow are the last people in the world to be concerned with the truth.

How very sad. If I thought I was on to such an Earth-shattering discovery, I'd DAMN WELL GET TO WORK ON IT.

How sad. How very, very sad your outlook is.

 

[Sizzler]

Ah, but they won't, Sizzler, because they're intellectual cowards. Don't you get it? The people you follow are the last people in the world to be concerned with the truth.

How very sad. If I thought I was on to such an Earth-shattering discovery, I'd DAMN WELL GET TO WORK ON IT.

How sad. How very, very sad your outlook is.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/87904670cd1dc0fcb.jpg[/qimg]

A claim is just a claim without support Gravy.

I personally see the truth movement moving ahead. The amounts of hours you've spent and continue to spend "debunking" the movement demonstrates such.

Either that, or you just wasted a good portion of your last few years debunking such an unworthy opponent.

I don't know which claim is worse for you Gravy...

 

[Gravy]

A claim is just a claim without support Gravy.

I personally see the truth movement moving ahead. The amounts of hours you've spent and continue to spend "debunking" the movement demonstrates such.

Either that, or you just wasted a good portion of your last few years debunking such an unworthy opponent.

I don't know which claim is worse for you Gravy...

Oh, weren't you the inside job agnostic? What a liar. You keep telling yourself that your movement of incompetents and liars is growing, Sizzler. Meanwhile, reality – as expressed by your own people – doesn't care a fig about your delusions. "A claim is just a claim without support?" Here's my support – from your own people:

How do see your future involvement with the TM?
1) I'll probably be more involved 9%
2) About the same 38%
3) I'll probably be less involved 49%
4) I'm no longer involved with the TM but think this survey may be useful to those who are 4%

Which of these theories do you think ARE strongly supported by evidence (check all that apply)
1) MIHOP (US gov't planned and made 9/11 happen) 21%
2) LIHOP (US gov't knew attacks were coming and deliberately didn't stop them) 55%
3) No planes hit the Twin Towers 5%
4) Flight 93 did not crash in Shanksville 12%
5) Flight 93 was shot down 8%
6) Flight 93 landed at Cleveland airport 0%
7) Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon 17%
8) Flight 77 flew over the Pentagon while a missile or bomb did the damage 2%
9) The planes that hit the towers weren't flights 11 and 175 4%
10) Videos of plane crashes were faked 5%
11) Some alleged 9/11 hijackers are still alive 7%
12) There is conclusive evidence of thermite or thermate use at the WTC 18%
13) The flight 175 pod & missile theory 0%
14) CD of the Twin Towers by explosives 35%
15) CD of WTC7 42%
16) Silverstein told/recommended that FDNY demolish WTC7 18%
17) FDNY knowingly participated in WTC demolition 12%
18) WTC7 destroyed because of sensitive information stored there 13%
19) There were bombs in the WTC basement, per Willy Rodriguez 11%
20) Faked phone calls from planes 6%
21) NORAD was ordered to "stand down" on 9/11 14%
22) Norman Mineta heard Dick Cheney confirm a "stand down" order, not a shoot down order. 18%
23) NORAD ran war games on 9/11 that mimicked the attacks and/or deliberately confused the response. 21%
24) Black box data from one or more flights was faked 11%
25) 9/11 was part of a false flag operation run by the NWO, which seeks world domination. 10%
26) Put options prior to 9/11 show foreknowledge 15%
27) "Dancing Israelis" and other evidene shows Israeli foreknowledge 22%
28) Evidence was deliberately quickly removed from the WTC site 41%
29) Nuclear devices were used at the WTC 1%
30) "Star Wars" directed energy weapons were used on the WTC 1%
31) Pakistan ISI partially funded the hijackers 59%
32) PNAC called for a "New Pearl Harbor" and engineered or allowed the attacks to get it 35%
33) The official version as told in the 9/11 commission report 0%

Through intellectual cowardice and despicable dishonesty, the "truth" movement has dug a hole from which it cannot escape, and has hirelings like you to build its coffin. And we pound another nail in every day.

So long, sucker.

 

[beachnut]

I personally see the truth movement moving ahead. ...

From stupid to insane? At least bigfoot does not involve murder and blaming others for the work of terrorist. What redeeming quality do liars of thermite have? Jones keeps on moving along, making new claims of a smoking gun. Looks like he is running low on new ideas.

The truth movement is moving ahead? It never left the station.

 

[Sizzler]

Oh, weren't you the inside job agnostic? What a liar. You keep telling yourself that your movement of incompetents and liars is growing, Sizzler. Meanwhile, reality – as expressed by your own people – doesn't care a fig about your delusions.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/8790472cf48df01de.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/87904785563261814.jpg[/qimg]



Through intellectual cowardice and despicable dishonesty, the "truth" movement has dug a hole from which it cannot escape, and has hirelings like you to build its coffin. And we pound another nail in every day.

So long, sucker.

oh wait, popularity contests are only relevent in highschool and politics....gosh, you had me there for a second.

 

[Sizzler]

From stupid to insane? At least bigfoot does not involve murder and blaming others for the work of terrorist. What redeeming quality do liars of thermite have? Jones keeps on moving along, making new claims of a smoking gun. Looks like he is running low on new ideas.

The truth movement is moving ahead? It never left the station.

And you spend your time on a site debunking a movement that never left the station.

Looks like the joke is on you

 

[beachnut]

And you spend your time on a site debunking a movement that never left the station.

Looks like the joke is on you...

Seems like a few idiots are on the train to nowhere. They need some help.

oops, that was a lot of time, back to the hot tub

 

[Sizzler]

Seems like a few idiots are on the train to nowhere. They need some help.

oops, that was a lot of time, back to the hot tub

So it actually left the station now? Which is it beachnut?

 

[beachnut]

So it actually left the station now? Which is it beachnut?

let me see, nowhere is still at the station, darn these are easy questions. like debunking jones dust stuff, his smoking gun, or was his cut column his smoking gun, or was it the concrete dustification that was really wallboard/insulation/ceiling tiles

tough questions

But Jones paper is easy to debunk from his own references. Old news now

 

[Sizzler]

let me see, nowhere is still at the station, darn these are easy questions.QUOTE]

 

[DavidJames]

oh wait, popularity contests are only relevent in highschool and politics....gosh, you had me there for a second.

Sizz - You are the one who broached the subject of the viability of the truth movement, gravy only responded. You lack the ability to think with reason and logic. You should take that into consideration when In your choice of careers and stay away from those that require critical thinking.

Oh wait, you're a 9/11 CTists, never mind, your choice of a career path is perfect.

 

[Sizzler]

Sizz - You are the one who broached the subject of the viability of the truth movement, gravy only responded. You lack the ability to think with reason and logic. You should take that into consideration when In your choice of careers and stay away from those that require critical thinking.

Oh wait, you're a 9/11 CTists, never mind, your choice of a career path is perfect.

I said the truth movement is moving forward.

Is it not?

 

[DGM]

I said the truth movement is moving forward.

Is it not?

It seems more stagnant to me. What new evidence has been presented? Dr. Jones seams to be backing up.

 

[Furcifer]

I said the truth movement is moving forward.

Is it not?

No. er Yes, it is not.

 

[Sizzler]

It seems more stagnant to me. What new evidence has been presented? Dr. Jones seams to be backing up.

Um....refer to OP please.....duh?!?!?!?!

oh, and throw thermite chips in there. Results of independent lab are still to come.

Oh, and WTC7 final report will surely spawn a whole new year of truth movement material to focus on.

So, people like Gravy should feel lucky. They still have a few more years of being popular.

 

[DGM]

Um....refer to OP please.....duh?!?!?!?!

oh, and throw thermite chips in there. Results of independent lab are still to come.

Oh, and WTC7 final report will surely spawn a whole new year of truth movement material to focus on.

So, people like Gravy should feel lucky. They still have a few more years of being popular.

In Boston Jones dumped the thermate argument. Richard Gage has dumped what he said was a huge smoking gun, "squibs". LCFC was a huge let down. As Gravy showed you the numbers are stagnant in their own surveys.

So where's the "Duh"?

 

[Sizzler]

In Boston Jones dumped the thermate argument. Richard Gage has dumped what he said was a huge smoking gun, "squibs". LCFC was a huge let down. As Gravy showed you the numbers are stagnant in their own surveys.

So where's the "Duh"?

The duh, is that truth movement action is, moving forward, and the OP is evidence of such.

Duh...

And, do you have a link to the Boston Seminar?