JohnDoeX: "I'm a real boy!"

If what was posted was correct, then it would seem DOH! is telling porkies:

Name : BALSAMO, ROBERT NICHOLAS
Airman's Address : 4711 WHEELER RD APT B
LOUISVILLE, TN, 37777-5453
FAA Region : Southern
Date of Medical : May, 2004
Class of Medical : 1
Expiration of Class 1 : Nov, 2004
Airman Certificates : Commercial Pilot
Airplane Single and Multi Engine Land
Instrument Airplane

Expired medical (expired 2004), no ATPL. He does have a flight instructor rating (expired 2001). What does 'DOI' refer to?
Please check me on this to see if it is correct:

https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/AirmenIndivDetail.asp?uniqid=A2614627

Cool site. I didn't even know it existed.

I searched myself and found I still have my certificate as an ATC, even though it's been years.
 
Didn't JDX mention that he flew one of the last Independence Air flights? I tried looking for the dispatch release he posted but he has "pulled" the image.

In any case, Independence Air ceased operations in January 2006. JDX had his last first class medical examination in May, 2004. The first class medical is only valid for 6 months at which point it reverts to a second class for another 6 months.

The first-class medical is required to fly under ATPL and the second class for CPL. This means that as of May 2005, JDX would not have been allowed to fly as a CPL.

Did anybody save a copy of the dispatch release?
 
This is the one and only time I'll ever deliver a message for Rob "JDX"

johndoex said:
....i'll address some issues while im here...

My Commercial was issued May 96.

Multiengine - July 96

CFI - 10/96

CFII - 3/97

MEI - 6/97

Flight Instructor certificates expire every 2 years. I renewed it twice (which is basically a quick check ride with an examiner.. they call it the 100 dollar Hamburger Ride because its a piece of cake... or you can take a written.. or if you are a Capt at an airline an FAA examiner will just renew it with the stroke of a pen.. you dont have to go through the whole training course again).

I got hired at ACA in July of 2000. I had 3 upgrade classes that cancelled. 1 due to Sept 11, the second due to United Bankruptcy (due to Sept 11), and the 3 due to FLYI start-up and subsequent furloughs. I took a voluntary furlough for a year due to my health problems and to save the job of a junior pilot. I was planning on going back to FLYI March 2006. But the company closed doors Jan 06.

My medical is still valid as a Class 3. ...a Class 1 switches to a Class 2 and then to Class 3 if not renewed. Medical is valid till May of 2007 as Class 3 privileges. I can get a Class 1 today if i want to.. along with renewing my CFI... all it takes is 200-300 dollars and a scheduled appointment. I have grounded myself due to health problems. ....
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=36331#36331
 

Well, that explains it........oh... except:

- No ATP(a requirement for all airlines)
- No type rating for the DO328 or 727(D'oh claims to have flown both)
- A Knoxville area address(D'oh claims to be a New Yorker)

Maybe beachnut or someone else can correct me, but I thought that FAA certificates didn't expire(mine don't). I looked up a pilot I know and his CFI/CFII ratings are dated 1988. In other words they dont list the recurrent date, they list the original issue date. I could be wrong.

The FAA says:

Commercial - 12/02
CFI/CFII - 6/99

....but D'oh says:

Commercial - 5/96
Multiengine - 7/96
CFI - 10/96
CFII - 3/97
MEI - 6/97

(implying that whats listed are the renew dates.)

I'm just asking questions
 
Well, that explains it........oh... except:

- No ATP(a requirement for all airlines)
- No type rating for the DO328 or 727(D'oh claims to have flown both)
- A Knoxville area address(D'oh claims to be a New Yorker)

Maybe beachnut or someone else can correct me, but I thought that FAA certificates didn't expire(mine don't). I looked up a pilot I know and his CFI/CFII ratings are dated 1988. In other words they dont list the recurrent date, they list the original issue date. I could be wrong.

The FAA says:

Commercial - 12/02
CFI/CFII - 6/99

....but D'oh says:

Commercial - 5/96
Multiengine - 7/96
CFI - 10/96
CFII - 3/97
MEI - 6/97

(implying that whats listed are the renew dates.)

I'm just asking questions

no expiration, need current medical, first class you are hooked up to OKC and they see your heart stuff as you are in doc office

did you look at all the pages, it has tabs

the first time I checked out JDX or the pilotstruth guy, I thought I saw an ATP and type ratings, I noticed his CFI was not current
 
no expiration, need current medical, first class you are hooked up to OKC and they see your heart stuff as you are in doc office

did you look at all the pages, it has tabs

the first time I checked out JDX or the pilotstruth guy, I thought I saw an ATP and type ratings, I noticed his CFI was not current

Glen Stanish, who registered the domain for pilotsfortruth, does indeed have everything he says he has including a B737 type rating. But, Robert Balsamo only had what I listed above.
 
Glen Stanish, who registered the domain for pilotsfortruth, does indeed have everything he says he has including a B737 type rating. But, Robert Balsamo only had what I listed above.

I bet I looked up Glen. I think I did go to whoisit or the ip place. Did Glen's stuff match the JDX junk? That name sound familiar.

Actually there are a few pilots who are have too much ego to believe anyone can fly the new jets. But they are easy to fly once underway. The things your Captain does to land and takeoff in the WX are the hard things that take some of years to master! If JFK junior had take IFR training he would still be flying. The hard part of flying was not demonstrated by the terrorist, simple winds and weather could have foiled them.

It was funny looking at the FDR video with smart remarks by a so called pilot. The so called pilot tells us the terrorist should have done a 25 degree dive into the pentagon instead of the simple turn and line up he did. I really do not ever want to fly with who ever made the comments.

A handful of pilots are in the truth movement. I am worried their poor judgment could be reflected in their flying.

 
It was funny looking at the FDR video with smart remarks by a so called pilot. The so called pilot tells us the terrorist should have done a 25 degree dive into the pentagon instead of the simple turn and line up he did. I really do not ever want to fly with who ever made the comments.

A handful of pilots are in the truth movement. I am worried their poor judgment could be reflected in their flying.


I'm 50/50 on D'oh actually being a pilot. I've known a few dumber-than-a-box-of-rocks pilots(but most are really quite sharp as you know), but D'oh has had so many foot-in-mouth dead giveaway moments(didnt know if UA used ACARS) that I'm pretty sure that if he is(was) a pilot - he's never commanded anything more than a Cessna 310.

Glen flies for Continental, so you might wanna avoid them. D'oh claims alot of the Independance Air pilots "had questions". But, don't worry, they went belly-up earlier this year.
 
Last edited:
Looks like the leaders in the truth movement self destruct in their everyday jobs. JaneDoe not picked up, Jones retired, etc.

Funny the first amendment comes up, I will have to remember that when my kids try to commit me!

Maybe one of our expert pilots single handedly brought down Independence air!
 
A handful of pilots are in the truth movement. I am worried their poor judgment could be reflected in their flying.

People like JDX need to realise that being a pilot does not mean you can't be wrong.

Someone quite a while ago mentioned the analogy of someone with a drivers license automatically qualified as a road crash expert. I thought that was quite succinct.
 
Actually there are a few pilots who are have too much ego to believe anyone can fly the new jets. But they are easy to fly once underway.

A couple of weeks ago, I was on a father-son campout, and one of the other dads in our group is a 757 pilot for Northwest. I asked him if he ever got a wierd feeling thinking it was his kind of plane that was hijacked on 9/11. He said no, and then added that the reason the terrorists made sure to hijack either 757s or 767s was that those are the ones that are automated enough that they could actually fly them successfully.
 
I bet I looked up Glen. I think I did go to whoisit or the ip place. Did Glen's stuff match the JDX junk? That name sound familiar.

Actually there are a few pilots who are have too much ego to believe anyone can fly the new jets. But they are easy to fly once underway. The things your Captain does to land and takeoff in the WX are the hard things that take some of years to master! If JFK junior had take IFR training he would still be flying. The hard part of flying was not demonstrated by the terrorist, simple winds and weather could have foiled them.

(snippage by TjW)

Really? I would be surprised if the new jets weren't the easiest to fly, in terms of the actual "monkey skills" of manipulating the controls.
They still have lots of complex systems to learn, I'm sure. But it would seem to me that safety considerations, if nothing else, would tend toward designing for a lower workload for the pilots.
 
Really? I would be surprised if the new jets weren't the easiest to fly, in terms of the actual "monkey skills" of manipulating the controls.
They still have lots of complex systems to learn, I'm sure. But it would seem to me that safety considerations, if nothing else, would tend toward designing for a lower workload for the pilots.

I agree with your assessment of new jets.
 
Really? I would be surprised if the new jets weren't the easiest to fly, in terms of the actual "monkey skills" of manipulating the controls.
They still have lots of complex systems to learn, I'm sure. But it would seem to me that safety considerations, if nothing else, would tend toward designing for a lower workload for the pilots.


Modern airliners require two crew-members: a dog and a man. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to bite the man if he touches anything.

-Gumboot
 
Cool site. I didn't even know it existed.

I searched myself and found I still have my certificate as an ATC, even though it's been years.

I knew about the site but I don't think they've always had a search function for pilot certificate holders. Very cool! I looked myself up too.
Edwin Richard Robinson
No address listed for me but my little Private Pilot Certificate shows up! :D

-z
 
Modern airliners require two crew-members: a dog and a man. The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to bite the man if he touches anything.

-Gumboot

That would explain why the darned plane was bumping like a kangaroo on drugs during my last trip to Canada: It wasn't airpockets! It was the dog and the man fighting over the controls!

;).
 
People like JDX need to realise that being a pilot does not mean you can't be wrong.

Someone quite a while ago mentioned the analogy of someone with a drivers license automatically qualified as a road crash expert. I thought that was quite succinct.


I had a guy who claimed to be a pilot(granted he only claims Cessna 172) who told me that Flight 77 could not have made the manouver because it dropped 7000 ft in 2.5 minutes and that is 2800 feet per second!!!

He had divided 7000 by 2.5 to get 2800. When I pointed out that there are 150 seconds in 2.5 minutes and that makes it 47 feet per second he changed the subject.

He also could not calulate the g forces claiming that flight 77 would have experienced 5 g in the turn it made. I calculated less than 1 g lateral and less than 1 g over normal gravity vertical force and asked him to check my figures. He couldn't.


I am also told that a 757 cannot exceed VMO, that the computer will not allow it. Anyone know if the computer will counter pilot commands and reduce power as Vmo is exceeded?
 
I had a guy who claimed to be a pilot(granted he only claims Cessna 172) who told me that Flight 77 could not have made the manouver because it dropped 7000 ft in 2.5 minutes and that is 2800 feet per second!!!

He had divided 7000 by 2.5 to get 2800. When I pointed out that there are 150 seconds in 2.5 minutes and that makes it 47 feet per second he changed the subject.

He also could not calulate the g forces claiming that flight 77 would have experienced 5 g in the turn it made. I calculated less than 1 g lateral and less than 1 g over normal gravity vertical force and asked him to check my figures. He couldn't.


I am also told that a 757 cannot exceed VMO, that the computer will not allow it. Anyone know if the computer will counter pilot commands and reduce power as Vmo is exceeded?

The proof is seen on 9/11, a pilot can exceed speed limits by pushing up the power or lowering the nose. You could shut down the engines and still go faster by pointing the nose down.

You are right. Flight 77 was simple pilot stuff, lazy sloppy turn, a 2500 feet per minute descent. Too simple. these guys kept it simple until they had their targets made, then they pushed up the throttles and crashed. Most pilots will tell you it is simple to do what the terrorist did.
 
If anyone cares, the G forces are recorded in the FDR data, and none of it is even remotely abnormal. I can look it up later but I think the vertical G never gets about about 1.7 or 1.8. The latteral is even less interesting.
 

Back
Top Bottom