Merged Jim Callahan's MDC claim

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bravo fakejakesnake!

So refreshing to read a post from someone with his eyes open instead of one of these poor old hacks in their skeptic stupor.

You will know them usually by the number of posts they have. Once they hit 4 figures, forget it. The disease has done its damage.
Question for Jimbo, fakejakesnake and buzz lightyear:
Where, in the descriptions for this forum or the MDC Challenge forum, do you find "performance art" mentioned as a purpose for either forum? There is a time and place for putting on a show, and a time and place for being straight with whom you are talking to-if someone is incapable of knowing which is which, that person needs help, not applause.
 
It is my opinion that neither forum is an appropriate stage for Jim's performance art. Though I give credence to a spark of, or moments of brilliance on Jim's part, I hope you'll see that most of my commentary hoped for a growth on his part and his art to the point where he is no longer compelled to use a place for straight talk (these forums or the Magic Cafe'), as a place to practice his theater or his small-minded vendettas.

You are right - he is incapable of knowing which is which. Or he is capable, but has found justification in his mind for playing us. His personal vendetta was never art, and never produced art.

As I said, I await his growth to see if he has more to offer, or if this is his best.
There is something just different enough about him to keep me intrigued, but I hope he grows to understand what the word colleagues means, and stops pooping where he mines.

Andy Kaufman is one of my heroes, and I believe Jim isn't mature enough to understand why and how Andy made it work.
Jim still has a personal axe to grind.
My sincere hope is that he never posts again, to either place, as his uncaring character.
My opinion is that at this moment, there may not be a difference between Jim and his character.

I've already read the script for Jim's play and know that he's left it to us to write his ending. He will reap what he sows.
And along the way, he has missed so many opportunities to share counsel, growth, wisdom, and friendship from people that share some of his spirt and motivations - in the very places they've set up for that sort of thing. Because he uses these places for questionable motives, he's forgotten that art must be defined by the artist AND by the viewer.
 
Last edited:
I find the last two posts on the subject that fakejakesnake to be very thought-provoking but I find the best summation in what Czarcasm wrote.

I for one am seeking straight clarification from Jim on his claims to better understand criticisms for and against him. He is intentionally hampering that process for reasons I don't care to consider.
 
When Jim claimed "Someone will die tonight" for his International Seance Project,I don't think he could have foretold the only thing dying would be his website!!!

I love irony.The big Slim an Jim show is going to have no audience for the amazing EVP and ITC contact. :D
 
Bumped for this
http://www.themagiccafe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?topic=279353&forum=251&479&start=450#28

Randi also waved the[prelimanary] first tests for SB.

If he would for me I would take his challege.

I allready did it once on national TV.

No one exposed me on the live show.

Randi & Angel let people think that was the case but it looks like
my $50,000.00 is still safe.
Why becouse Randi & Angel could not expose me!

I bet I can win the $1,000,000,00

Is it game on then Jim?
 
BTW, Jim, I've enjoyed sharing the youtube video of you getting powned by Criss Angel with friends.

The total spaz was maybe not the most effectual choice of response to Angel's challenge, no?
 
Can somebody PLEASE tell me WTF "H.o.A-X" is supposed to mean? Other than the obvious?
 
I always wonder about people like Jim, and Uri Geller: do their wives know they're frauds? Surely they do. I also don't know how you can live with yourself, leaving a legacy of fakery and deception.
 
Ignore the articulate and well thought out criticisms and focus on one-liners. Good idea. I mean, if you want to prove something, like that skeptics don't really think, it is best to ignore evidence to the contrary.

"I do what I claim." So do I. It is an easy thing to say when what that claim exactly is is nebulous.

But I have my claim and challenge posted.

Randi came up with the test and now runs from it.
(Bit odd don't you think)?

Anyway sorry if I was edgy some of this stuff just runs a bit think at times.
I also understand that most here would have no idea of that.

And I say sorry for not be as nice to you as i should have been.

Best Wishes,

Jim
 
Hey good one and your point is what?

I would have thought that was obvious. I'm accusing you of employing the same sort of tactics as those who engage in fraudulent activity. You never say what you are or what you do except in the most vague and undefined terms. You are only explicit about what you are not or what you don't do. Effectively, you never say anything, and thus you cannot be held to any particular commitment. It is a method used when one has something to hide.
 
Posts moved to AAH. Get back on topic, and stop bickering. Be civil.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
Never said I did Paranormal things.

_Jim

I'm not sure if I understand. Did you not indicate that Raymond Hill died but is not dead and that you are in communication with him. Is that not something you said and is that not a paranormal thing if one were to do it?
 
Why would it be paranormal?

When you read my words on this screen are you not in communication with me?

I am both a part and apart from this conversation.
Raymond Hill is much the same.

His corporeal self stopped its progression along the time line we share in nineteen eighty however other parts of him continue interacting.

That was proven during my experiment on the NBC show.

Hope this makes my position more clear to you.

Jim
 
I would have thought that was obvious. I'm accusing you of employing the same sort of tactics as those who engage in fraudulent activity. You never say what you are or what you do except in the most vague and undefined terms. You are only explicit about what you are not or what you don't do. Effectively, you never say anything, and thus you cannot be held to any particular commitment. It is a method used when one has something to hide.


Sorry but you are wrong.

I have made very specific claims and just because you wish to paint me as something other than what is claimed on my website, challenges and guarantees I can only assume you are unwilling to consider other possibilities.

Nothing is being hidden.

However it looks to many like you desire that to be the situation and are intentionally not seeing what is really before you.

Not terribly unlike a person in a hypnotic state.

Possibly this post will snap you out of it.

Hope your holidays are enjoyable.

Best Wishes,

Jim
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom