Jim Callahan
Thinker
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 249
I think you are wrong.
Unless you can tell us what will happen in the furure.
-JIM
Unless you can tell us what will happen in the furure.
-JIM
Are we allowed to confirm your Goldman Sachs account with $1 million in it and see the legally binding contract describing your challenge?
I think you are wrong.
Unless you can tell us what will happen in the furure.
-JIM
Seems to me all Jim does is veer on libel with Randi at any given opportunity,attempt to ridicule him and generally put him down.
The graphic from Jim's site, posted above says:I will not be sending in an application for the MDC.
Winning the MDC requires applying. You have stated that you will not be sending in an application. Doesn't add up.$1,000,000.00: That is what I intend to make as a result of testing with James Randi and his JREF organization
Of course. He can apply, state his claim, and present his protocol for that test. But he refuses to do so. Is there some reason that Jim Callahan should be given different treatment than every other applicant?My sarcasm and skepticism aside, I think the test outlined at http://www.jimclass.com/Bid_for_$1,000,000.00.htm by Jim Callahan is quite doable. Isn't there some way he and the JREF can work something out?
Of course I can, and I'll put money on it. $1,000 says that if you don't apply for the MDC, you don't get tested for the $1 million. Remember, time is running out. Do I have your agreement to this bet, Jim?I think you are wrong.
Unless you can tell us what will happen in the furure.
-JIM
I will not be sending in an application for the MDC.
Jim
Please let us all know what you are going on about.
Does it have a thing to do with this thread.
Thanks,
Jim
*snip*
So in his "flaccid" state, Randi looks like someones grandpa. But do as Jim is doing, and "presto" you have a show that the punters will pay to watch.
And it is a good show too.
The stumpy old weather beaten trickster turned skeptic, verses the young, good looking, tall upstart.
It doesnt get any better than this.
Go Jim.![]()
Had a memory loss recentley have you? You know full well what Im referring to.For the sake of the rmembers who may have missed the little gem:you were enquiring to the secret services re: counterfeiting/Randi.![]()
I will not be sending in an application for the MDC.
Jim
I will not be sending in an application for the MDC.
Jim
Azrael, (everyone, really)
Please be sure to remember that this section is a showcase for the MDC. Please keep it as civil as absolutely possible, and on topic. Being sarcastic and personal does not help.
Perhaps you could review the following thread (posts 5 and 6 in particular) to understand my comment.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=124538
The mods should not need to be heavily involved in these threads.
Any comments on that thread should be posted there, but in this thread, please let's keep it civil, and all direct our attention to assisting claims in moving forward, instead of anything negative.
Thank you.
I suspect because it adds to his PR/hype. There are lots of folks that claim "paranormal" ability...to stand out in that crowd you need a gimick. Jim's apparently is to just flap around (figuratively speaking), creating a lot of hype about Randi/JREF/MDC to gain some preceived form of credibility.Jim,
Why do you bother with Randi's challenge so much?
He will not undergo scientific/credible testing because he has no "paranormal" ability, and testing such as this would simply expose him as a fraud.If you do have paranormal powers why not turn to scientists and every t.v. station and newspaper in the world and prove to THEM that you have these powers.
Not gonna happen; he'll continue to make a living (as long as he can anyway) playing the typical "shell game" that this ilk does; ie. make outlandish claims about having special powers, but never providing any credible proof...just smoke and mirrors.If you possess these powers then you will surely succeed with your demonstrations and easily become the wealthiest man alive.
What's Randi's $1M compared to that?
Jim Callahan, I can not write nice words about the way you've acted in this forum.
I hope you answer the points raised by Gravy and GzuzKrytz honestly and clearly. In real life, deliberate dodging is for losers.