I think Rossley does not understand the difference between "there were no echoes" and no one I talked to reported hearing echoes". His undying faith in paraffin tests is rather sad. He spouts off about how reliable they are and brags of his law enforcement contacts, but can not give up any names or other data.
He interrupts too much also; a sign of a debater with weak support for their position. He claims that Marina Oswald told him that her husband was innocent. Rossley is unwilling to give us any quotes from her to support his stance.
He claims that Marina Oswald does not know how to operate a camera. He must think she is a real idiot.
Oswald was a lousy shot claims Rossley. Maybe true, but a person can be a lousy shot and still hit a man from less than 100 yards away. Rossley says the two stage trigger means you have to pull the trigger twice to make it fire. A two stage trigger is one that has a very small notch in the hammer that the sear catches on to reduce creep to a minimum and enhance accuracy. Whether or not the typical Carcano has one does not make a difference. Mine does not have one and it is far too inaccurate to benefit from it. Claims bench testing means the rifle is bolted down or in a vise. Not true, just means it was shot from a stable sitting position with the rifle resting on the shooting bench. Rossley claims it took over 2 seconds to cycle the Carcano bolt. Really stupid claim. Rossley cries about the debate allowing assumptions, but makes plenty of his own.
Macadams correctly states that the scope was not mounted for a left handed shooter. Rossley demonstrates he is too incompetent to make any reasonable claims about firearms. Rossley believes the Warren commission when it supports his claims, and also believes other “evidence” that contradicts the Warren commission when it supports his claims.
Rossley claims nobody saw the Zapruder film for 12 years, not true. I made it through part three. Rossley is getting clubbed like a baby seal.
Ranb
I really want to know.
