Jet engine of wrong type found near Ground Zero

Anders Lindman said:
I BELIEVE that the story about 19 hijackers from Saudi Arabia is false. I also believe that no planes hit the WTC towers.
Click to expand...

Eyewitnesses to the planes impacting the towers, video records of the planes impacting the towers, seismic recordings of the planes hitting the towers, eyewitnesses to identifiable aircraft parts hitting the ground, video records of the aircraft parts on the ground. Radar tracking of the planes ending with their impacts. Passenger's body parts, personal effects, and matching DNA recovered from the site, passenger phone calls.

What you have to refute the above evidence to support what you "believe"......zilch :rolleyes:
 
Foolmewunz said:
We saw it. Period. It wasn't a hologram, a missile, or a pigeon (Hi, MaGZ!) - it was a honking great jet passenger airliner that made a honking great hole and a honking great explosion (sound and fury, both).
Click to expand...

... and was carrying 65 people -including the hijackers- on board. What say you, Anders?
 
Anders Lindman said:
"The author is George Nelson, Colonel, USAF (Retired)

Explores the absence of serial-numbered time-change parts from any of the 9/11 crash sites and the refusal of the US authorities to engage with the issue. No matter the speed and catastrophic nature of the impacts it is certain that such identifiable parts would have survived. It is also certain that the US authorities DID collect sufficient debris to guarantee that there would be such identifiable parts in their posession.
Click to expand...

George Nelson lies a lot. He wants you to believe crap that means nothing is evidence of the most horrendous of crimes. He is giving aid and comfort to the enemies of humanity by trying to blame the government for crimes that were clearly committed by racist terrorists intent on bringing down secullar government.

The lying little sack of slop insists that a rebuild of every aircraft that crashes is standard operating procudre. This simply is not so. Reconstructions are done only to determine the cause of an accident. We knew the instant that the second aircraft hit the WTC that the cause of the crashes was a deliberate criminal act, rather than an accident, and that the crashes were the clear result of controled flight into terrain.

The parts numbers on the aircraft were not even needed to identify the aircraft. We already knew of exactly FOUR planes that were mssing in action. DNA and documents and personal affects of persons known to be on those aircraft were recovered at all four crash sites.

George Nelson clainms that the government was responsible for the Murrah Building bombing.

He's a terrorist.
 
If there were no crashes what happened to the aircraft, passengers and crew?
 
1337m4n said:
You don't get to claim that the President is really a unicorn in disguise, provide no evidence other than the paranoid ramblings of a drunken street bum, and then demand that other people prove you wrong. The burden of proof goes to the one making the claim.
Click to expand...

The birther thread is just down the hall to the right .....

:-)

-- Roger
 
You guys will never find out whether Anders is just a troll or a completely brainless waste of time. He's been doing this for months now with no end in sight. The only way to end this thing is to stop responding to him.

However, if you want to keep it going, carry on! But there is no light at the end of this tunnel, folks.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Using the elevators I guess. In pieces if necessary. Explosives were also probably placed OUTSIDE of the facade, to create the cookie cutter shapes of planes: http://image.shutterstock.com/displ...of-a-corporate-office-skyscraper-43138870.jpg So it's theoretically possible that they could have brought parts into the buildings that way too.
Click to expand...

And they bribed all witnesses and inserted graphics into live video feeds and .......

Wouldn't it have been a lot easier for "them" to hijack some airliners and fly them into the buildings?

-- Roger
 
Last edited:
Anders Lindman said:
I BELIEVE that the story about 19 hijackers from Saudi Arabia is false. I also believe that no planes hit the WTC towers.
Click to expand...
Which is how you explain to everybody that your are a freaking idiot who has forfeited to right to have people pay attention to you. You are not only stupid, you are a despicable little turd. Go away.

And, in over ten years of message boarding, you are the FIRST poster I have placed on "ignore." You deserve more, but that's the worst I can do here.
 
Last edited:
I think there's more evidence that Anders is not a real person but is just a spambot computer algorithm. No real person could be that stupid, could they?:jaw-dropp
 
The commonly-held narrative of 9-11 says the sky was blue that day. Therefore, Anders believes it was purple.
 
Anders Lindman said:
How difficult can it be to determine if a part like this can be used in a 767 engine? :confused::confused::confused: http://209.85.62.24/46/112/0/p173686/_chromalloy01_edit.jpg
Click to expand...
That would depend upon whether you had a closed or opened mind.

Anders Lindman said:
I have searched a lot on the Web and sure, found many discussions about it, stretching YEARS back, yet basically very little concrete confirmation or denial. Frustrating! :mad: I'm starting to suspect that the info posted about this on the Internet is some kind of disinfo/smokescreen campaign.
Click to expand...
I can only assume that you believe that when a modification is made to an engine, or an aircraft, they are taken out of service until such mods are carried out. Well that isn’t so. Modifications are performed during the various maintenance periods such as 100 hour inspections among others. Modifications are not directives, In the case of an engine modification, that mod may not be done until overhaul, or when an engine has a problem. And TBO can range from 3000 to 5000 hours or more in some cases. That’s a lot of flight time.

In some cases, it not uncommon for an aircraft to be flying with a modified engine on one side, and an unmodified engine on the other.


Anders Lindman said:
One alternative would be to contact Pratt & Whitney directly about it, but I don't know what to ask for.
Click to expand...
Thats a good idea, they need a laugh too.

Anders Lindman said:
I give up!
Click to expand...
About time you realize you lose again.:D
 
One alternative would be to contact Pratt & Whitney directly about it, but I don't know what to ask for.
Click to expand...
fess said:
Thats a good idea, they need a laugh too.
Click to expand...
Oh man that's priceless. Can you imagine the email exchange!

Hello, my name is Anders,

I'm a truther who believes that no plane hit the WTC on 9/11. I'm wondering if you could please tell me the engine configuration of the JT9D-7R4D engines on the Boeing 767-222, registration number N612UA, Flight 175 that didn't impact the WTC on 11/9/2001.

Regards

Anders
 
Sunstealer said:
Oh man that's priceless. Can you imagine the email exchange!

Hello, my name is Anders,

I'm a truther who believes that no plane hit the WTC on 9/11. I'm wondering if you could please tell me the engine configuration of the JT9D-7R4D engines on the Boeing 767-222, registration number N612UA, Flight 175 that didn't impact the WTC on 11/9/2001.

Regards

Anders
Click to expand...

Dear Anders,

Unfortunately we are unable to deal with your request... due to everyone now on sick leave, thanks to the massive hernias caused by laughing our butts off at you.

Regards

P&W Admin
 
I think Anders' posts are a faked disinfo campaign. His arguments have been digitally altered to look like idiocy. I don't believe there are any eye witnesses to his actually typing this garbage, only people reporting secondhand what they saw on their computer screens. How could anyone believe these arguments could collapse completely into their own footprint? They must have been demolished. The impact of plane (sic) common sense couldn't have made him do more than sway momentarily. Carefully placed contradictions left his assertions unsupported and brought down the whole house of cards. How can anyone not see this? The mere fact that no tiny particles of fact have been reported in the wreckage of Anders' arguments is part of the coverup.
 
Jack by the hedge said:
I think Anders' posts are a faked disinfo campaign. His arguments have been digitally altered to look like idiocy. I don't believe there are any eye witnesses to his actually typing this garbage, only people reporting secondhand what they saw on their computer screens. How could anyone believe these arguments could collapse completely into their own footprint? They must have been demolished. The impact of plane (sic) common sense couldn't have made him do more than sway momentarily. Carefully placed contradictions left his assertions unsupported and brought down the whole house of cards. How can anyone not see this? The mere fact that no tiny particles of fact have been reported in the wreckage of Anders' arguments is part of the coverup.
Click to expand...

What of the peer-reviewed paper 'Inactivated Logic Discovered in the Analysis of the Fallout from Anders Lindmans Posts'?
 
Jack by the hedge said:
I think Anders' posts are a faked disinfo campaign. His arguments have been digitally altered to look like idiocy. I don't believe there are any eye witnesses to his actually typing this garbage, only people reporting secondhand what they saw on their computer screens. How could anyone believe these arguments could collapse completely into their own footprint? They must have been demolished. The impact of plane (sic) common sense couldn't have made him do more than sway momentarily. Carefully placed contradictions left his assertions unsupported and brought down the whole house of cards. How can anyone not see this? The mere fact that no tiny particles of fact have been reported in the wreckage of Anders' arguments is part of the coverup.
Click to expand...

nominated
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom