By people who don't know anything about the CIA beyond fictional TV shows and movies.
You have nothing to worry about then, unless you live outside of the US, and even then they go through the NSA depending on the target, and they don't waste time with non-threats. The way private citizens in the US share almost every aspect of their lives on social media means no black op is needed to look into someone's life these days.
Plus, the fact you insist on using the word "bug" in context with modern cell phone and internet communication speaks to how far behind the times you are on this subject.
Why would the "corporate media" waste their time on a "half-suspicion"?
The same reason any reasonable person would never waste their time. Suspicion is based on perception, not fact. 16 years have passed since the 1992 election that put Clinton into office; where are the facts? Where is the proof of any drug smuggling or child prostitution? They have practically documented every time the guy unzipped his fly in a room with a woman who was not his wife, so why is there a blind spot when it comes to cocaine shipped by the ton? Child prostitutes need to live somewhere, eat, sleep, use the restroom, bathe, and see a doctor from time to time, so where are they?
And getting back to the OP, there has never been an allegation of Bill Clinton ever swinging the gay direction. That is not something that just pops up late in life, and his documented track record is 100% female attraction.
For the record, I don't like Bill or Hillary Clinton. I didn't vote for Bill. I only voted for Hillary because the choice was so painfully obvious. I didn't like him based on many of his policies, and how he conducted many aspects of his White House operation (he was sloppy). There was never any need on my part to reach for redneck generated paranoia as the base for my dislike of the man.