• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jehovah

Stop! Stop, will you?! Stop that! Stop it! Now, look! No one is to stone anyone until I blow this whistle! Do you understand?! Even, and I want to make this absolutely clear, even if they do say 'Jehovah'.
 
No-one has rendered this in response to the OP yet??!


Stop! Stop, will you?! Stop that! Stop it! Now, look! No one is to stone anyone until I blow this whistle! Do you understand?! Even, and I want to make this absolutely clear, even if they do say 'Jehovah'.

From the link

Some people render the four-letter Name as "Jehovah," but this pronunciation is particularly unlikely. The word "Jehovah" comes from the fact that ancient Jewish texts used to put the vowels of the Name "Adonai" (the usual substitute for YHVH) under the consonants of YHVH to remind people not to pronounce YHVH as written. A sixteenth century German Christian scribe, while transliterating the Bible into Latin for the Pope, wrote the Name out as it appeared in his texts, with the consonants of YHVH and the vowels of Adonai, and came up with the word JeHoVaH ("J" is pronounced "Y" in German), and the name stuck.

The same link shows there is quite a bit of superstition associated with use of the names of this idea of god (as molded by organised religion.) I couldn't find any reference re organised religious teaching that anyone mentioning the name should be stoned to death, but it wouldn't surprise me if there is.

Humor is a good way to help deal with such terrible things done in the names of gods.
 
She's a deist. The universe is god apparently. Basic new age nonsense.

The universe being a god is pantheism, not deism.

Deism is about believing in a God that created the universe, but then basically didn't go an reveal himself to prophets, and didn't dictate scriptures, and stuff. He's only "revealed" by his creation and having endowed people with reason and stuff. A.k.a., I don't understand any of that, therefore I know God did it :p

It must also be said, though, that deism happened in an age where it still wasn't ok to just be an atheist. So deism was also a way to deny organized religion and basing dumbass laws and customs on the bible, but still say 'hey, look, I'm not denying that there's a God.' Not that it helped all that much. A lot of people still went butthurt at denying their revealed saviour, and most called you an atheist anyway.
 
Last edited:
Side-splittingly-funny.

Theist? Pantheist? Deist?

Can't find a round hole for the square peg....

*hoot*
 
Quite.

I would have carried on explaining the connections in relation to the story of Daniel and other biblical events which involve Jehovah in visions, OOB experiences, dreams and the like...linking that with the concept of Gaia.


I tend to lean towards thinking of Jehovah as more the Feminine and have come to the conclusion that the idea of Jehovah came into the human awareness as it did, through the Earth Entity, who used it as a kind of costume/mask.

While Gaia is able to interact with humans and influence humanity it appears that She only can do so primarily through visions, dreams, serendipity, synchronicity, occult device, etc...and plays the parts of all the many god-type ideas which exist.

Whatever you think it to be, She can act the part.

So the idea that some god is going to actually turn up on the planet and take over the affairs of humanity (as JWs and others believe) is not something she is able to make happen (apparently) but She is not limited by that and uses what she can to influence events and outcomes which She favors.

The god is already on/in the planet and we are all aspects of it.

Perhaps if they turn up at my door again, I will move the conversation to that idea.

:thumbsup::D
 

Indeed. :D

The Devil was also mentioned.

I think they brought him into the conversation and I jumped on that and asked them who created the devil? I wanted their take on that because it tied in with my understanding (which this post OP explains a little bit about) and how such a character would 'fit' into that particular cosmology.

They replied that the Devil "Satan" had created himself.

That threw me slightly so I asked them to explain and they said that Jehovah and created a perfect Angel being and that the being then chose to ... well....basically recreate itself as Satan.

(Now its not that I had never heard the story, but that was a new angle so I figured the question had been asked before (how about that!) and then argued that if Jehovah created the devil, then Jehovah must be evil, and this was a way to cover that factor and get on with the argument.)

So anyway, I then told them that if the Angel had been created perfect and then recreated himself, he must have had the power/ability/intelligence etc on how to do so beforehand, and since beforehand the creature was created perfect then Jehovah must have designed him/her that way to be able to make that choice, at least potentially.

They didn't disagree but stated that we are created with free will and thus we choose to be whoever and act however we want to, even if it is against Jehovah and Jehovah's plans.

But when I took that aspect and used it to explain that Jehovah needed this to happen in order for (his) plans to unfold, they didn't agree...or seemed to disagree that this is the way one should interpret the concept.

The subject then turned to Adam and his free will choices...

The theme of course runs throughout the bible and I was just getting to the point of explaining the connections in relation to prophesy and how easily enough humans could manipulate events if they had enough power and money and influence to do so and how this could explain why such prophecy as the Jews returning to their homeland came true in relation to the end time events they (the JW women) were focused upon and they replied that The Jews were enemies of Jehovah and what they did had nothing to do with prophecy...

That surprised me and I said so...adding that millions of Christians believed that that was indeed part of end-time prophecy but my point was still that such events can be manipulated without the need a sky-daddy god.

But I could tell that they were somewhat antsy-Israel and they plainly didn't think much of that subject...That raised my eyebrows because back in the day they shared the same camps and gas chambers and ovens and Jehovah didn't discriminate Jew/JW - so what was with that?

Their eyebrows raised now, I figured it probably wasn't the best time to explain that the Jews think of Jehovah as both the bringer of good and evil and didn't require a devil character to take the place of Jehovah's abilities in that department...The Jews understood that Hitler and the Nazi were part of the plan ...but I did say that Christianity - the invention of Roman and Jewish ruling class - had invented the devil in order to polarize the idea of GOD. Now god had an enemy rather than an adversary...slightly different in connotation, but the difference is significant nonetheless...

Anyway, like I said, Gaia can play whatever role you want her to...but in that, she also has a true role which is closer to home. Organised religion rewrites the role to further its political agenda as adversary to Hers. Whatever words are put in Her mouth, better make sure they are words She would actually speak.

Which is why I told the women that they follow after and represent the Bible, invention of Christendom, NOT Jehovah.

The theme runs through the book anyway, so's not to say some of it isn't inspired by Gaia through visions and OOBs and NDEs and other such means the atheists claim is just the brain tricking and scientist develop drugs to counter.
 
This story reminds me of a Knight Rider episode wherein two invulnerable cars were sent hurtling towards one another. What happens when the immovable hits the indestructible?
 
This story reminds me of a Knight Rider episode wherein two invulnerable cars were sent hurtling towards one another. What happens when the immovable hits the indestructible?

You can elaborate if you wish to.

Are you saying the two JW women were immovable? That would be correct.

Are you saying that they couldn't destroy my argument - not sure that was really the case. They understood but couldn't agree because of the beliefs they have adopted from their particular organised religion.

It isn't that they couldn't go further with me if they wished to, but that the dogma they believe in prohibits them form moving forward in that direction and 'walls' came up as a reaction from that position.
 
Well basically what I said to the JW women was that Jehovah did also allow evil to express its thing, because it doesn't ultimately get in the way of his agenda anyway.

Which wasn't saying that Jehovah was on Hitlers side, but that Hitler and Nazism and other systems of disparity were a choice people could make if they wished to, even that his agenda wasn't along the same lines. He wasn't about to FORCE people to make the best choices.

We have the data. How we use it is up to us as individuals.

They agree with me on that...but for a different reason than me 'tis all.


Raised as a JW, thankfully escaped, I have a dog in this fight, actually Jehovah, was on the Nazis side, at least in the beginning.
They actually made approaches to the Nazis explaining how their views of the Jewish Problem was identical (one of the original founders was an anti semitic pyramid conspiracy nutter, how unexpected) and there are indeed photos existing of them having a convention in a Hall laden with swastikas.
Of course it all ended badly...
 
Raised as a JW, thankfully escaped, I have a dog in this fight, actually Jehovah, was on the Nazis side, at least in the beginning.
They actually made approaches to the Nazis explaining how their views of the Jewish Problem was identical (one of the original founders was an anti semitic pyramid conspiracy nutter, how unexpected) and there are indeed photos existing of them having a convention in a Hall laden with swastikas.
Of course it all ended badly...

Well I wasn't arguing that JWs were in support of Jehovah's agenda or that they were actually witnesses on his behalf. I thought that was made clear enough
 

Back
Top Bottom