Merged Jeffrey MacDonald did it. He really did.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Henri McPhee said:
It might be worth your while to read the Civil Suit again.
Click to expand...

IT MIGHT BE WORTH YOUR WHILE TO READ IT and ACTUALLY ATTEMPT TO COMPREHEND IT!

Once again, I challenge YOU to point out a single SUBSTANTIVE ERROR in Fatal Vision. You cannot do it because there are none. The Civil Suit was settled not won by inmate nor lost by Joe M. Nothing in the transcripts of that trial expose any substantive errors in Fatal Vision because there are not any to expose.

Seriously henri - put up or shut up! Point out the SUBSTANTIVE ERRORS you claim are in Fatal Vision.....you know as well as I do that you cannot because they don't exist.....
 
MacDonald Camp Hypocrites

Hypocrites seem to gather around the MacDonald camp fire whenever the topic of Fatal Vision comes up. Advocates scream from the rooftops in regards to the handful of errors contained in McGinniss' true crime masterpiece, yet skulk away whenever the light shines brightly on the mess that is Fatal Justice.

As the Landlord of MacFantasy Island and other advocates know, there is an average of 1 half-truth, factual distortion and/or outright falsehood every 3rd page of this ball of toilet paper. In many instances, the same half-truth, distortion and/or lie is repeated several times over.

In 2007, the government bolstered the amateur research on FJ by disputing ALL of the factual claims leveled in this work of fiction. The content of their response briefs mirrored the conclusions rendered by several MacDonald case researchers.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
 
The American media are not much help. This is part of what Dr MacDonald once wrote about the American media in his case. Fred Bost and Potter were journalists and they had right judgment with regard to the MacDonald case:

"Having now viewed the 10/14/98 "American Justice" segment on my case, I feel compelled to offer several comments. First, I applaud you for an attempt to be fair, to allow both sides, as it were, to be heard. The case is convoluted and lengthy and I understand it is impossible to tell the entire story in one hour, never mind addressing the particular concerns of so many participants.

However, I would be less than candid and truthful if I did not point out several items that appear especially relevant to establishing the truth of the case:

...
Click to expand...

http://www.thejeffreymacdonaldcase.com/html/mac-ae.html

Edited by Loss Leader: 
Edited for Rule 4
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow! Jeff MacDonald promoting the idea that he's innocent....how......normal for this murdering scumbag unfaithful husband, rotten father and adult human male who sends bodily secretions through the mail.
 
Psychopath's Logic

Inmate's letter/retort to the American Justice program is a case study in how a psychopath deciphers concrete data. His repetitive themes (e.g., evidence tampering, suppression, and exculpatory evidence) ignore the FACT that PRIOR to writing that letter, the 4th Circuit Court concluded that the arguments regarding evidence tampering/suppression lacked merit. In addition, the claims of exculpatory evidence were deemed "specious" by this same Court.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
 
Last edited:
JTF said:
Inmate's letter/retort to the American Justice program is a case study in how a psychopath deciphers concrete data. His repetitive themes (e.g., evidence tampering, suppression, and exculpatory evidence) ignore the FACT that PRIOR to writing that letter, the 4th Circuit Court concluded that the arguments regarding evidence tampering/suppression lacked merit. In addition, the claims of exculpatory evidence were deemed "specious" by this same Court.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
Click to expand...

And you can sum up HP's continuing series of posts with pretty much the same verbiage.

Did HP learn this from his man crush or was delusional thinking a preexisting condition?
 
JTF said:
Inmate's letter/retort to the American Justice program is a case study in how a psychopath deciphers concrete data. His repetitive themes (e.g., evidence tampering, suppression, and exculpatory evidence) ignore the FACT that PRIOR to writing that letter, the 4th Circuit Court concluded that the arguments regarding evidence tampering/suppression lacked merit. In addition, the claims of exculpatory evidence were deemed "specious" by this same Court.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
Click to expand...

It's not specious if you are innocent.
 
Guilty Beyond All Doubt

This case is a prime example of how even educated human beings will purposely squash critical thought in favor of their own personal feelings (e.g., heart over mind). Unlike several other high profile murder cases, this case carries no REAL controversy. The physical evidence in this case demonstrates that Jeffrey MacDonald is not only guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, he is guilty beyond ALL doubt.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
 
JTF said:
This case is a prime example of how even educated human beings will purposely squash critical thought in favor of their own personal feelings (e.g., heart over mind). Unlike several other high profile murder cases, this case carries no REAL controversy. The physical evidence in this case demonstrates that Jeffrey MacDonald is not only guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, he is guilty beyond ALL doubt.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
Click to expand...

EXACTLY!
 
There was an interesting murder case on one of those American true crime channels yesterday in which a young woman was murdered in a small police department area, which is similar in a way to the MacDonald case. The case remained unsolved for four years. Then a murderer was caught at another police department area for another murder, and he confessed to the original murder, and five other murders, and he then committed suicide in prison.

The point is that the original detective in charge of the investigation said on TV that most murders involve friends or family or are drug related. That's jumping to conclusions and not being able to see further than your nose.
 
Henri McPhee said:
Take nothing on appearances, take everything on the evidence. There is no better rule.
Click to expand...

Then follow it, dude. You just believe every word that falls out of your man crush's mouth and ignore all the evidence with the specious defense of "they" hid evidence without providing proof.

Or is this a case of "Do as I say and not as I do?" Because I've yet to see you take any of the evidence against your idol mac seriously.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom