• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jacko demonstrates his mental breakdown

JRWoodward said:
The unsettling thing is that Jackson has gone so far off the deep end without the need for drugs or booze, which he apparently doesn't use. So, not even AA/NA could help. What kind of psychological intervention do the Jehovah's Witless (sic) allow, anyway, and is Jackson still a JW?

I think the only intervention he's had is from NAMBLA.
 
JRWoodward said:
The unsettling thing is that Jackson has gone so far off the deep end without the need for drugs or booze, which he apparently doesn't use. So, not even AA/NA could help. What kind of psychological intervention do the Jehovah's Witless (sic) allow, anyway, and is Jackson still a JW?
According to the article above, he's no longer JW but insists that the hired nannies and help be. Shades of Howard Hughes and the Mormons.
Re: drugs/booze, I wouldn't be surprised to find various prescribed psych drugs in his system: anti-depressants, etc.
:eek:
 
davidhorman said:


That's what the surgery has been about? He was trying to look like Marlon Brando?

David

I'm not sure if Marlon Brando had anything to do with the North American Man-Boy Love Alliance, but that was what I was referring to.
 
Brooklyn Dodger said:


I'm not sure if Marlon Brando had anything to do with the North American Man-Boy Love Alliance, but that was what I was referring to.

I think David was refering to the OTHER group that uses the name NAMBLA.... The National Association of Marlon Brando Look Alikes.
 
Segnosaur said:


I think David was refering to the OTHER group that uses the name NAMBLA.... The National Association of Marlon Brando Look Alikes.

Coincidence? We report, you decide.
 
Have ANY of you ever...

..."Dangled your child over certain death?"

Like at the zoo, ever hold you kid over the aligator pit, or as you are driving down the interstate, ever open the passanger door and pretend liek you were going to shove an unrestrained child out the door, or how about holding a child over an aquarium filled with flesh-eating pirannas?

Jacko said, "...I would never intentionally endanger the life of my child.", but that is EXACTLY what he did.

Had he dropped the child surely a 4 story fall would have resulted in a 'bad ending'...

I personally believe that he is guilty of 'child endangerment', at its most basic defination.

The closest thing I could get a parent to admitting to was throwing their child into the air, and then catching them. But even this probably wouldn't have resulted in certain death...a broken bone or two, maybe...
 
There has to be a first time for everything, and this is the first time I've really understood what KOA was saying - and on top of that, I agree with him.

When I was young, about 4 or 5, I saw a schoolmate's parent throw their other daughter, of about 2 or 3 years old, into the air, spinning them through 360 degrees and catching her again, over the pavement (sidewalk). Even at that young age I could hardly believe what I was seeing.

David
 
Re: Have ANY of you ever...

King of the Americas said:
..."Dangled your child over certain death?"

Like at the zoo, ever hold you kid over the aligator pit, or as you are driving down the interstate, ever open the passanger door and pretend liek you were going to shove an unrestrained child out the door, or how about holding a child over an aquarium filled with flesh-eating pirannas?

Jacko said, "...I would never intentionally endanger the life of my child.", but that is EXACTLY what he did.

Had he dropped the child surely a 4 story fall would have resulted in a 'bad ending'...

I personally believe that he is guilty of 'child endangerment', at its most basic defination.

The closest thing I could get a parent to admitting to was throwing their child into the air, and then catching them. But even this probably wouldn't have resulted in certain death...a broken bone or two, maybe...
I was leaning to "this was just dumb" but KOA makes a great point. I too agree with him. Good post.
 
No WAY!!!

:eek: :eek: :eek:

Agreeing with ME...!?!?

Who'd a thunk it?:)

---

I think Michael Jackon is one sick puppy, and wouldn't make my list of babysitters in a billion years.

I read in another post that he thinks it is okay to sleep with little boys...I am sure that he didn't mean to have 'sex with them', but rather just to have them in his bed overnight. Even at this, I am bit taken aback. I can't imagine sending my kid to a 'sleep-over' with Michael Jackson, much less a 'sleep-in'.
 
Have promised not to start any new threads for a while, so I'm posting this MJ update here:

February 04, 2003

Jackson faces ruin after admitting: I sleep with boys
By Adam Sherwin, Media Reporter



MICHAEL JACKSON’S career lay in ruins last night after he admitted in a television documentary that he coaxed young boys into sleeping in his bed.
The star, who was accused of molesting a boy ten years ago, said that he recently encouraged a 12-year-old cancer sufferer to sleep in his bedroom. He also claimed to have slept in the same bed alongside several other young boys.
...

Jackson defended his desire to sleep in close proximity with young boys, under persistent questioning from Bashir.

He described the practice as “very charming, very sweet” and recommended that Bashir sleep in the same bed as friends of his own children. He also claimed that children like to be touched and said he would kill himself if he could not be close to them.

“It’s what the whole world should do,” he told the interviewer, Martin Bashir, when questioned about the incident during the Granada television programme, Living With Michael Jackson.
...

Jackson’s friend, Uri Geller, persuaded him to allow Bashir to become part of his entourage for eight months. But the resulting film, which has been bought by the US broadcaster ABC for £3.5 million, could lead to police action against the fallen star.

One executive described it as the “longest suicide note in history”.

Tom Sneddon, the District Attorney behind the Chandler investigation, is expected to look at the new allegations after the programme is screened in the US this Friday. A spokesman from his office said: “We will be watching the programme with interest.”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-565675,00.html
 
This is news? I assumed this to be the case for years.
 
Brooklyn Dodger said:
This is news? I assumed this to be the case for years.
Believe it or not some people think OJ will find the real killer yet.
In this thread there were some who refused to believe their own eyes and ears.

The import of the article cited is that it may be his total undoing, at his own hands, and may now lead to new criminal charges.
At least his children (wards?) should be protected from this pervert.

In case the link doesn't work:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/
 
OK, maybe he hasn't been completely undone. He's still on the loose. But do we really want him in jail? He'd be a celebrity in prison like he is outside. Parents everywhere already know about the guy. Don't they?
 
Brooklyn Dodger said:
OK, maybe he hasn't been completely undone. He's still on the loose. But do we really want him in jail? He'd be a celebrity in prison like he is outside. Parents everywhere already know about the guy. Don't they?
Huh?
 
Brooklyn Dodger said:
OK, maybe he hasn't been completely undone. He's still on the loose. But do we really want him in jail? He'd be a celebrity in prison like he is outside. Parents everywhere already know about the guy. Don't they?

It hasn't been proven that Jackson is guilty of pedophilia.

Parents everywhere might "know about the guy", but people will do strange things for money...they've even been known to sacrifice their own children. Jacko's an example of that.

I'd say he's already in prison. He's too big a meal ticket for too many people. They'll never let him go.
 
Hmm, yes, there could be some money-making potential in a Michael Jackson in Prison album...the only problem would be getting the proper sets built in the country club he'd have to spend weekends locked up in, during the off-concert-season.

Hell, even if guilty, do any of you think he'd do a minute's worth of serious time?
 

Back
Top Bottom