It's the final countdown: 28K has cracked the case!

It was a typo............



my guess is...............



...........should have been.................

LUBE.
God I hope not. We've got that here in the States. Hell, we've even got Lube Stops up and down our major thoroughfares.
 
Personally, I wouldn't piss on pdoherty if he was on fire, so I can't see why anyone even bothers to engage him in debate.

There comes a point, as with the Christophera saga, when you just have to step away and disengage from feeding their twisted fantasies, because we are finding some very mentally disturbed people who believe the 911 CT.
 
I love this exchange:



She answered his question about the "fires" after his claim that there weren't any fires, in a faulty comparisson between his claim of explosives in WTC 1 & 2 when none can be seen and no fires in WTC 7.

So he dismisses it as "you can't explain it"...typical :rolleyes:

It's even more disingenuous when coming from someone who constantly whines about others trying to derail his threads, when they challenge him on his hypocracy.

Back in the old LCF "Gravy's a Freemason" thread that was deleted, I posted as Herminius, asking why the "Truth" movement tolerates so many obvious liars in their ranks. I just wish I could post there again, with all the really blatant lies he's been making this week.
 
Well, ConspiRaider, while I may luuuuuuuuuve 28th Kingdom, I really really like sevon!

She asks about the "smoking gun"-video:

sevon@LCF said:
We see what looks like smoke or dust coming out the right side of the tower, is that what you're referring to? There are many things that could cause this, so it's not direct evidence of explosives.

Additionally, if you believe they were explosives, what purpose did they serve in that location? The collapse didn't initiate from that location.

... and 12 hours later the answers comes:

28th Kingdom@LCF said:
We've just sunk to new levels...
He is of course right, for once ...
 

Back
Top Bottom