Isn't the US Constitution tyranny?

crimresearch said:
Let's see...where were we before JJ decided to try to derail with the race card?


I did nothing of the sort. You invented that, in short, you MADE IT ALL UP and now you're lying in an obviously willful attempt to affect my reputation.

You're an unethical, unprofessional liar. I pointed out your knee-jerk, dishonest behavior.

Retract your lie immediately.
Oh yeah...

*IF* the definition of tyranny includes absence of a constitution
(as in the provided example), then equating a constitution with tyranny is a non-starter.

OTOH, If Claus has fabricated his own personal Sooper Sekrit woo-woo definition of tyranny, along the lines of 'when the people who would have been considered slaves by the Crown, were governed for a time by a constitution voted on by those who rejected the Crown, then it must be tyranny'....
then he is trolling.

Again.

If you had even a modicum of ethics, rather than willfully lie about me, you could have pointed out quite correctly that however flawed it was, it was a lot better than what preceeded it.

Instead you chose to pick a fight, engage in deliberate insult, lies, and abuse of another human being, first, and then say something germane.

Your obvious dishonesty and lack of ethics is apalling.

Cease and desist in your lies.
 
Diogenes said:
Your definition of tyranny is based on comments made by Capedodger and Shane ?


:dl:


Did you get their permission?

Would you WANT it?
 
LegalPenguin said:
Let me see what horrible racist things jj said...



Did I miss something here? What part of this is JJ trying to "derail with the race card?"

Nothing. As is par for crimresearch, he deliberately slurs people he disagrees with in fashions intended to cause them real-life harm.

Did you miss the part about the "hood" above?
 
Diogenes said:
This should be a lot more interesting than the OP.. Particularly in light of the recent clarification by Claus.

You mean where it becomes clear he's picking another fight with Shane?
 
jj said:
Another outright lie from crimresearch.

Yes, I will report this.

I require your admission that I am in fact active in the civil rights movement, and am not anyone who one normally thinks of as "wearing a hood".

NOW, liar, retract it. NOW.

I think of you as wearing a hood...

but it has more to do with the weather in the northwest and that you don't strike me as an "umbrella" kinda guy... more like the just throw on a sweatshirt or jacket and pull up the hood, not so worried about messing up the hair....


I really am curious as to how your first post reveals racist intent, or for that matter your preferences as to headgear in any way...

I've seen this poster make similar left field attacks in this and my prior incarnation here (as Skeeve's love-slave, "Suddenly") so that it usually isn't worth caring about, but this one just seems so far detatched from reality that I'm interested again
 
jj said:
You mean where it becomes clear he's picking another fight with Shane?

Just curious, that's all.

Heck, even I was surprised that there were so few who actually got to vote for the damn thing...
 
jj said:
I did nothing of the sort. You invented that, in short, you MADE IT ALL UP and now you're lying in an obviously willful attempt to affect my reputation.

You're an unethical, unprofessional liar. I pointed out your knee-jerk, dishonest behavior.

Retract your lie immediately.


If you had even a modicum of ethics, rather than willfully lie about me, you could have pointed out quite correctly that however flawed it was, it was a lot better than what preceeded it.

Instead you chose to pick a fight, engage in deliberate insult, lies, and abuse of another human being, first, and then say something germane.

Your obvious dishonesty and lack of ethics is apalling.

Cease and desist in your lies.


Poor abused JJ..we all know how much reallife harm you suffer everytime 'one of them' dares to get uppity with you by citing the dictionary...or linking to facts...or quoting your own words, precisely in context.
:rolleyes:

Will you try to blackmail JREF into getting rid of me again for such abuse?
Because it was really hilarious the last time you tried the old 'there goes the neighborhood, I'm leaving unless you get his kind out of here' crap.

Much more amusing than your current tack of pretending you know nothing about posting that whiny threat, and then jumping on the race baiting band wagon, by stalking me from thread to thread with nothing to offer but more whining.
 
crimresearch said:
Poor abused JJ..we all know how much reallife harm you suffer everytime 'one of them' dares to get uppity with you by citing the dictionary...or linking to facts...or quoting your own words, precisely in context.
:rolleyes:

How about doing that now for us rubes that maybe missed it? Can you cite the words from this thread that support your contention that jj played (or at least attempted to play)a "race card" here?

Give us some help... instead of chest-thumping about citing facts and text, could you, you know, maybe actually cite something?
 
Grammatron said:
I didn't say an English word. For all you know there's a Dannish word that means exactly that.
None that I can think of. Tyranny means the same in Danish as in English.
 
crimresearch said:
OK, 're'-played...

:rolleyes:

That doesn't help you at all.

Just because you claim he's done it before isn't evidence he's doing it now.

Again:
Give us some help... instead of chest-thumping about citing facts and text, could you, you know, maybe actually cite something?
 
What is obvious, is that crimresearch is the only one playing a race card here by claiming someone else did, when they didn't.

He won't be posting any comments by JJ, 'cause there weren't any..

Either we are all idiots, or just one of us is..

Should I start a poll?
 
Diogenes said:
What is obvious, is that crimresearch is the only one playing a race card here by claiming someone else did, when they didn't.

He won't be posting any comments by JJ, 'cause there weren't any..

Either we are all idiots, or just one of us is..

Should I start a poll?

Better yet how about some facts to back up that assertion, instead of an appeal to popularity...

I seem to have ticked off a few woos and posers here and there. ;)
 
LegalPenguin said:
But how do you say "Asystemwithoutuniversalsufferage" in Danish?

One word?
Nope several, just like in English (exactly the same actually, except of course for a word by word translation). Of course when using the word democracy we'd often implicitly assume that we were talking about a democracy with universal sufrage, but that's no different from English.
 
I must admit I, too, am intrigued to hear an explanation of what jj said that equates to playing the race card. Call me a simpleton, but I've read his posts to this thread several times, and cannot suss it out. Please help.
 
Diogenes said:
What is obvious, is that crimresearch is the only one playing a race card here by claiming someone else did, when they didn't.

He won't be posting any comments by JJ, 'cause there weren't any..

Either we are all idiots, or just one of us is..

Should I start a poll?

I disagree. We are all idiots. Except maybe Tricky, but he's from Alabama, and we all know about those people.


One step above Virginians
 
crimresearch said:
Better yet how about some facts to back up that assertion
The assertion that jj didn't play the race card? How about the fact that he didn't mention race in any shape or form? Is that good enough for you? Now instead of asking us to prove a negative, why don't you provide evidence for your assertion that he did indeed play the race card? Hurry please, the suspense is killing us.
 

Back
Top Bottom