Originally posted by demon Even casually and pragmatically subordinating human welfare to imperialism will secure horrors on both sides. One begets the other.In what way was human welfare subordinated to imperialism?
Think how many thousands of other people died more horrific deaths yesterday due to the subordination of human welfare - without comment or mourning in the US press.I’m thinking, who are these thousands? In fact, given the relative human suffering involved, I think the former is demonstrably worse.
There was no torture involved, the people were shot dead and then their bodies were mutilated from every internet report I can find. Mutilating a corpse is obviously bestial, but such bestiality is driven by impotent rageDriven by impotent rage? Then there must have been a lot of such bestial rage under Saddam’s rule. Was there? and the only sadism involved might be the unintendedIf it’s unintended, it’s not sadism. What evidence do you have it was unintended? effect to the relatives of the dead. It is no more of a murder than the ten thousand plus killed in the invasion and unmourned and uncounted by the palpably hypocritical US press. I disagree. I think that when the bodies are burned, dragged, and then hung for display that makes it more of a murder. That’s in addition to the difference in the goals of the perpetuators. Who was it who said "we don`t do numbers"? Hmm, depends who they are as always.
Both of these where already dead and hanging upside down in a war-zone, as opposed to the innocents hung by the neck for the colour of their skin by US racists. Interesting comparison. A good one, I think.