Is this possible? (math)

Dazed

Muse
D
Joined
Aug 7, 2006
Messages
586
A converging lens has a focal length of 10 cm. A screen is placed 30 cm from an object. Where should the lens be placed, in relation to the object, to produce a focused image?

You're supposed to be able to get the answer using the thin lens equation,

F = 10cm
di + do = 30cm

1/di + 1/do = 1/F

But nothing I've tried clicks. Everything seems to indicate that when the focal length is 10cm, the image always appears at least 40cm away. Sorry to post such a crappy question but I'm stumped.
 
do is the distance from the object to the lens, di is the distance from the projected image to the lens. Since its given that the image and the object are 30 cms apart, and the lens is somewhere in between, then the sum of di and do must equal 30.

Object--------------------Lens----------------Image
<--------------do--------->< ---------di---------->
<------------------------30cm-------------------->

The problem is, the position of the lens is the variable.
 
IF the lens must be between them, I keep getting an imaginary number.

Specifically, I came up with 15+/-(7+iSQRT(3))/2 for di

I used your second equation (di+do=30) to substitute do in terms of di (do=30-di), then plugged it into the third, reduced it to a quadratic (di2-30di+300=0), and applied the quadratic formula.

Are you sure you have all the units and their values correct? (i.e.-centimeters vs. meters, 10 vs 1 or 1.0, etc)?

DISCLAIMER: It's bene a while, so I may well have amistake somewhere.
 
Last edited:
Why does the lens have to be between the screen and the object? Put the object between the screen and the lens and the math works out.
 
"The system of equations 1/di+1/do=1/f=1/10 and di+do=30 will help you find two numbers that would satisfy the geometry of the question (distance between the image and the object is 30 cm) and the optical device used to produce the clear image of the object (the lens has focal distance of 10cm).

To visualize the story, you may try to do the following experiment. Get the magnifying glass (it is a converging lens), lit the candle, and set up a screen (piece of paper). By moving the converging lens between the screen and the candle, you will find that there would be one specific distance between the candle and the lens that produces the larger image of the candle light.

As you can see, the distance between the candle and the screen remains constant. "
 
Dazed said:
But nothing I've tried clicks. Everything seems to indicate that when the focal length is 10cm, the image always appears at least 40cm away. Sorry to post such a crappy question but I'm stumped.
Click to expand...

You are right, the minimum distance object-screen with a real object and a real image is 4f'. If that distance is greater than that, there are two possible positions.

The usual equation is
[latex]
$$
\frac{1}{f'} = \frac{1}{s'}-\frac{1}{s}
$$
[/latex]

where distances to the left (right) of the lens are negative (positive). A real object has s < 0. Let's assume s' >0 (real image) and s= - |s| < 0. We want the minimum value of |s| + s'. I'm going to use your notation: |s| = do, s'=di.

[latex]
$$
D=d_o + d_i = d_o + \frac{d_o f'}{d_o-f'}
$$
[/latex]
With dD/d(d_o) = 0 we get d_0 = 2f'. If we go back to our original relation, this implies d_i = 2f', so D= 4f' is the minum distance real object-real image.

As an interesting additional exercise, consider Bessel's method for the determination of the focal distance. I said that if D > 4f', we have two positions for the lens where an image of the object is formed on the screen. If we call a the separation between those two positions, prove that
[latex]
$$
f' = \frac{D^2-a^2}{4D}
$$
[/latex]
 
Last edited:
Dazed said:
A converging lens has a focal length of 10 cm. A screen is placed 30 cm from an object. Where should the lens be placed, in relation to the object, to produce a focused image?
Click to expand...
Just shooting from the hip off of intuition here, but wouldn't the distance of the lens, from either the object or the screen, to produce a focused image be dependent on the size of the object and the intended size of the projected image of the object on the screen?
 
Ah.. So then the image must be virtual? But then how would it project onto the screen? :boggled:
 
Ilessthanthree: No. That would be determined by the distance between the object and the screen, not the lens position.
 
I less than three logic said:
Just shooting from the hip off of intuition here, but wouldn't the distance of the lens, from either the object or the screen, to produce a focused image be dependent on the size of the object and the intended size of the projected image of the object on the screen?
Click to expand...

Those variables aren't given.
 
Dazed: You could always re-arrange the object into a virtual one. Or get another lens.
 
The problem with the virtual image is it appears on the same side of the lens as the object, rather than being focused onto the screen on the other side, which is the goal.
 

Attachments

  • raydiagram.JPG
    raydiagram.JPG
    13 KB · Views: 1
Case 6 dude.

You can see the image. I'm trying to find a pic of one of those "magic boxes" where the image floats in the air. :boggled:
 
Huntsman said:
I didn't see where the question said it must be a real image, as opposed to a virtual image.
Click to expand...

The described setup will not work with this (and it implies real object and real image, because the light comes from the very candle we are trying to image and the lens is between the object and the screen). Also, virtual image does not form a visible projection on a screen (you can image it and record it in many ways, but this implies an additional optical system). The suggested setup is impossible with these values. Is it from a book? Maybe an erratum.
 
Last edited:
Huntsman said:
I didn't see where the question said it must be a real image, as opposed to a virtual image.
Click to expand...

You're right but it is implied by the mentioning of the screen. If I were to answer the question I would start by explaining why a real image cannot be produced on the screen, before you assume it has to be a virtual image. That way you demonstrate your knowledge of the equation and the lens theory.

I would also expect that a lazy tester just "changed a few numbers" in an old question and assumed it would still produce a valid answer.

Did you post the >exact< text of the question?
 
The virtual image doesn't form on the screen, but you can see it at the appropriate place. I'm not finding any photos, alas. I think this would depend on the exact wording of the problem and how you interpret "focus on screen." I think it would be possible to give the appearance of an object plastered onto a screen.
 
Orangutan said:
I would also expect that a lazy tester just "changed a few numbers" in an old question and assumed it would still produce a valid answer.
Click to expand...

Or maybe a good tester phrased an impossible question to see if the takers really understood anything about the subject, or were just mechanically using the formulas!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom