Zelenius
Muse
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2008
- Messages
- 908
For a few years now, photographer Chris Arnade and journalist Cassie Rodenberg have been going into the Hunts Point neighborhood of the Bronx to get up close and personal with the drug addicted(crack/heroin, sometimes alcohol) prostitutes who live there. Many have allowed their pictures to be taken, and have told their stories.
Chris Arnade Photostream (Some of these photos are very disturbing).
It seems that most of the time, these women(and some men and transexuals) were physically and/or sexually abused as children. Some were repeatedly raped as children. A lot were raised in foster care or have been living on the streets since their early teens. Very often, their parents were drug or alcohol addicts too, and almost all of them have been in and out of jail or drug rehab for years now.
Much of Arnade's and Rodenberg's work has appeared in Scientific American - Addicts as Parents, Part I: Pregnant, Now What?
Some of the regular readership of SA has voiced their opposition to these articles, believing this doesn't belong in SA because it isn't "scientific" enough. Or that it is "exploitive". A lot of people feel "uncomfortable" when they see pictures of people doing drugs or believe these people are completely "hopeless" and so this is a lost cause.
Regardless, do you believe this series is helping these poor people at all? If not, how can society help them? Has society failed them, or have they failed themselves or is it a mixture of both?
In my opinion, I think this approach does help a tiny bit. Still, I think it is very unrealistic to think that most of these poor women will eventually get clean. Depressing as it may sound, almost all are doomed to live the rest of their lives like this. People who live like this tend to have a significantly shorter life expectancy.
These journalists/activists generally do not preach or judge, but they do try to encourage these women to go to rehab. To some degree, they have befriended a few of them. In the very least, I think it helps to see these prostitutes as flawed human beings rather than the "scum" of society, which is how many people see them.
Chris Arnade Photostream (Some of these photos are very disturbing).
It seems that most of the time, these women(and some men and transexuals) were physically and/or sexually abused as children. Some were repeatedly raped as children. A lot were raised in foster care or have been living on the streets since their early teens. Very often, their parents were drug or alcohol addicts too, and almost all of them have been in and out of jail or drug rehab for years now.
Much of Arnade's and Rodenberg's work has appeared in Scientific American - Addicts as Parents, Part I: Pregnant, Now What?
Some of the regular readership of SA has voiced their opposition to these articles, believing this doesn't belong in SA because it isn't "scientific" enough. Or that it is "exploitive". A lot of people feel "uncomfortable" when they see pictures of people doing drugs or believe these people are completely "hopeless" and so this is a lost cause.
Regardless, do you believe this series is helping these poor people at all? If not, how can society help them? Has society failed them, or have they failed themselves or is it a mixture of both?
In my opinion, I think this approach does help a tiny bit. Still, I think it is very unrealistic to think that most of these poor women will eventually get clean. Depressing as it may sound, almost all are doomed to live the rest of their lives like this. People who live like this tend to have a significantly shorter life expectancy.
These journalists/activists generally do not preach or judge, but they do try to encourage these women to go to rehab. To some degree, they have befriended a few of them. In the very least, I think it helps to see these prostitutes as flawed human beings rather than the "scum" of society, which is how many people see them.
Last edited: