Is there really a "Journolist?"

I Ratant said:
.
When I was first made aware of this, was on CNN, where they presented the original tape, and then the whole thing.
The obvious intent to destroy the career of Ms. Sherrod was completely obvious.
Breitbart's distancing himself from that intent is evil by any standards.
It was deliberate on his part, and he continues to try to deceive, based on the absurd responses of Obie's guys and the NAACP, to the original fraudulent presentation.
Click to expand...


Breitbart has stated that he did not have, nor did he see, the original tape. I have no reason to not believe him. As to the Obie guys and the NAACP, their responses speak for themselves.
 
Breitbart has zero credibility, you should actually put up a reason TO believe him when he says he didn't have the original or knew the tape was editted to promote a malicious agenda.
 
leftysergeant said:
It is the opposite of morality and order.

Does morality also not exist in your time/space continuum?
Click to expand...

The opposite of order is chaos, which is not necessarily evil.


Morality is a bit of a moving target ... and less clear conceptually.
 
leftysergeant said:
If he did not see the full tape, then the drooling idiot had no idea what he was presenting, which indicates an IQ about twenty short of needing a legal guardian.

If he did see the full tape, he is simply evil for having presented it as proof that Sherrod is a racist and that NAACP approves of that.
Click to expand...

Hmmm...so those same arguments would apply to the NAACP and the Obama administration as well? If they did not see the full tape , then the drooling idiots had no idea what they were acting on, which indicates an IQ about twenty short of needing a legal guardian?

If they did see the full tape, they are simply evil for having accepting it as proof that Sherrod is a racist?
 
thaiboxerken said:
Breitbart has zero credibility, you should actually put up a reason TO believe him when he says he didn't have the original or knew the tape was editted to promote a malicious agenda.
Click to expand...

Why should I question his credibility? No one has yet offered any evidence that he deliberately lied about anything. Would you care to be the first?
 
Kegeshook said:
Why should I question his credibility? No one has yet offered any evidence that he deliberately lied about anything. Would you care to be the first?
Click to expand...

Stop your trolling, I'm not falling for it. G'bye. You are on ignore.
 
Kevin_Lowe said:
Because I'm not your remedial teacher. Shoo.

Come back when you feel like contributing something.
Click to expand...

Actually , I am contributing something. I'm shining a light here questioning the charge that Breitbart has lied about this case or anything else. Instead of attempting to back up the allegations you make against him, you just brush me off and tell me to do your work for you. Of course it's easy for you to do so. I'm just new here. I must be a troll. Be gone troll. Right?
 
I've said as much in the past, but the Administration and the USDA should be ashamed of themselves for railroading a good person's career in the name of tap-dancing around perceived "reverse racism."

But make no mistake - Andrew Breitbart threw the match, and he didn't give a good goddamn who got burned.

I don't know if it's been established whether or not Breitbart had access to the full video segment prior to posting the cherry-picked portion, but that's largely irrelevant.

He's had every chance to apologize for starting this fracas, and if he had one iota of either professionalism or personal honesty he would have done so.

Once again, comparisons between Dan Rather and Andrew Breitbart are ridiculous.

Andrew Breitbart's career prospects are better than ever now.

What happened to Dan Rather after his gaffe?

The difference is this: Dan Rather, as a journalist, lost objectivity when he fell on the "Bush Documents" grenade. To a real journalist that loss of credibility is career-ending.

To an opportunistic provocateur like Breitbart who is not a journalist, no such sense of commitment to objective truth exists. Same thing with Hannity, Olbermann, and Beck.
 
Kegeshook said:
Actually , I am contributing something. I'm shining a light here questioning the charge that Breitbart has lied about this case or anything else. Instead of attempting to back up the allegations you make against him, you just brush me off and tell me to do your work for you. Of course it's easy for you to do so. I'm just new here. I must be a troll. Be gone troll. Right?
Click to expand...
.
Your critical thinking is deficient.
 
I Ratant said:
.
Your critical thinking is deficient.
Click to expand...

I would say he's got a good set of partisan blinders. Which are fairly common around here, that said, even some of the true die-hard right wingers on JREF have condemned Breitbart for his actions.
 
Breitbart was once useful to the GOP, until he got caught telling lies about the result of the pimp and ho game. He said they had a 100% success rate, but it was revealled that three offices either turned the slimeballs away or called the cops. In all the other cases, anyone who knows anything about investigations can tell that the actors were trying to get as much information as possible from the pimp or to get next to the ho for some other purpose than setting up a brothel.

Breitbart's interests are not served by reality.
 
Kegeshook said:
Why should I question his credibility? No one has yet offered any evidence that he deliberately lied about anything. Would you care to be the first?
Click to expand...
Google and Media Matters are your friends. ;)

Big Falsehoods: An updated guide to Andrew Breitbart's lies, smears, and distortions
The "video evidence" of Shirley Sherrod's "racism" (NEW)

"Nationwide ACORN child prostitution investigation" (UPDATED)

Platform for anti-gay Jennings smears

Breitbart-promoted O'Keefe Census tape features selective editing (NEW)

Breitbart-promoted video falsely accuses Democrats of reconciliation hypocrisy (NEW)

Wild accusations over Gladney case

Breitbart's websites make baseless claim that NEA engaged in lawbreaking

Bertha Lewis' nonexistent White House visit

The Maoist Christmas tree ornaments

The ACORN "document dump"

False claims of community organizers "praying" to Obama
Click to expand...
Now if you really care about the facts, rather than simply looking for falsehoods that support your political fantasies, you'll actually address these evidence supported accusations with evidence and not your personal assertions which clearly are not impressing anyone here, even those on the right.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Google and Media Matters are your friends. ;)

Big Falsehoods: An updated guide to Andrew Breitbart's lies, smears, and distortionsNow if you really care about the facts, rather than simply looking for falsehoods that support your political fantasies, you'll actually address these evidence supported accusations with evidence and not your personal assertions which clearly are not impressing anyone here, even those on the right.
Click to expand...
Media Matters is a far-left entity founded by a notorious liar. Why should we trust anything that they have to say? Looking at the list, I don't see anything of substance. Certainly nothing that directly implicates Breitbart in any wrongdoing. I don't see where he's done anything bad at all. What is it that I'm missing or overlooking? Where are the falsehoods?
 
Kegeshook said:
Media Matters is a far-left entity founded by a notorious liar. Why should we trust anything that they have to say? Looking at the list, I don't see anything of substance. Certainly nothing that directly implicates Breitbart in any wrongdoing. I don't see where he's done anything bad at all. What is it that I'm missing or overlooking? Where are the falsehoods?
Click to expand...
Uh-huh. Predictable response. Dismiss the evidence with hand waving that the source is not non-partisan. :rolleyes:

ADDRESS THE EVIDENCE, not the site it is posted on, please. Thank you.


And as for MM being notorious liars? You don't have a shred of evidence to support that claim. Breitbart, and Fox OTOH, there is more than a wealth of evidence supporting they are frequent sources of lies.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom