Is Jowenko Echt Woowoo?

[maccy]

From earlier in this thread:

Update:

I managed to reach Danny Jowenko. He is a true gentleman, someone whose patience and courtesy makes me regret calling him a woowoo. Sadly, I must report that he believes that the collapse of WTC 7 "looks man-made." He did acknowledge that information obtained from a Dutch documentary formed his opinion initially, but he says that he has received e-mails from Americans on both sides of the issue. He agreed to look at the photos and analysis on debunking911.com and 911myths.com.

I don't know what to think. He agrees that real jihadists flew planes into the Twin Towers. He regards the remote-controlled drone crap and the laser beams from outer space as lunacy. But, he is stuck on the notion that there were some sort of secret intelligence findings housed in building 7 that "officials" didn't want the public to know about, which accounts for bringing down the building in a manner that harmed no one. He tends to minimize the damage to the building and seemed unaware of the fuel tanks.

So, we have someone who doesn't believe that the Impossibly Vast Conspiracy orchestrated the attacks, but who thinks that WTC 7 was destroyed to prevent certain vague information from getting out.

Frankly, I'm gobsmacked .

Here is the earlier Rikzilla thread on the same issue:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63884

Jowenko doesn't seem to go into details about how it was done. However, it seems clear that he thinks it is independent of what happened in WTC1 and 2. This means that they either prepped the building on 9/11 or it was prepped in advance "just in case".

Neither of these make a lot of sense.

Also what kind of Government keeps extra-secret documents in a shared commercial office building in the middle of a major city?

 

[Aphelion]

So he's of the opinion that an enormous building can be rigged for impromptu demolition in a few hours? Unnoticed? From scratch? With no preparation?

Rumsfeld:

"Oh, no! Planes hit the towers! WTC 7 has sensitive documents and has been damaged! Quick, go get several hundred bombs, send your men down into the chaos, past hundreds of police and emergency workers, past the firemen, carrying those truckloads of bombs, get them inside the damaged WTC 7, and wire up the several hundred charges at key points, while the building is burning, so we can blow the building and scatter said documents out onto the street!"

"But Mr. Rumsfeld, why don't we just send five agents into the buildings, flashing badges, saying they need to haul out some documents because they pertain to national security? They can tote them out on hand carts in half an hour. It's not like having classified documents is a crime, right? We don't even have to keep it a secret. They can literally tell people at the scene, 'we're going in to haul out some classified documents,' and the people there would have said, 'okay.' So why blow up the building, at the risk of hundreds of lives and exposure that would ruin us forever?"

"THAT'S INSANE. We're losing time, Johnson!"

When will you be informing Mr Jowenko that he is wrong in your expert opinion?

Please tape the call so we can all hear.

 

[Dog Town]

When will you be informing Mr Jowenko that he is wrong in your expert opinion?

There are cracked nuts, in every bag! So what? He is wrong, happens.

 

[David Wong]

When will you be informing Mr Jowenko that he is wrong in your expert opinion?

Please tape the call so we can all hear.

Cool that you've admitted you're MIHOP now.

When you will be informing all of the other experts in the world that you disagree with their expert opinions, and agree with Mr. Jowenko?

Please tape the calls so we can all hear.