Brainster
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 26, 2006
- Messages
- 21,944
This perception first began to be voiced in the 1950s, when Eisenhower was running against Stephenson for president. It was widely suggested that Stephenson lost the presidency because hew was too much of an "egghead", talking over people's heads.
Never mind that he flunked out of Harvard Law. Or that Gore flunked out of both law and divinity school, while Bush got an MBA from Harvard. Or that Bush had better grades at Yale than did John Kerry.
Of the last three Republican presidents, two can barely form a coherent sentence and the third was observed to make up his own facts very frequently. Dolts? Certainly not. Neither were they the most brilliant presidents we've ever had. Nixon, on the other hand, really was brilliant, in a Machiavellian sort of way.
I'm surprised you didn't include Ford.
Democrats tend to be populists and a lot of their constituency tend to be poor. Republicans do better with the higher income brackets, and there is a strong correlation between this and college education. So it seems that this statistic is more an artifact of wealth than of education. Yet it seems to be Republicans who rail against "pointy-headed intellectuals" and "effete snobs". For example, some like to insult teachers and lawyers.
I'm not insulting them, and your point is valid that college graduates may be more likely to become Republicans because of their own self-interest.