rockysmith76
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2019
- Messages
- 1,990
Progressives could solve their electoral problem by distributing themselves more evenly among the 50 states.
The word is Liberal.....
Progressives could solve their electoral problem by distributing themselves more evenly among the 50 states.
No.The word is Liberal.....
No.
If I wanted to use the word liberal, I would have done so. This is a personal choice in terminology that I made some years back, and have stuck with ever since. I'm not going to debate my word choice with you here. I just want to make it absolutely clear that it's an intentional choice, and that your "correction" is unnecessary and unwanted. If you want to debate the term, start a thread or send me a PM. In this discussion, "progressive" is what I said, and it's what I meant.
Nope.... the Hillary campaign screwed the Bernie Campaign and put herself in as the nominee for the Dems, it was all her and all on her. That is straight up classic denial. Her baggage bagged her campaign, not bernie.
Another flaw of the two party system, you assume because I dislike Hillary I must be a Trump guy, you would be wrong
the same FBI that manufactures Terror plots to foil them and then pat themselves on the back.
Source: any one of a number of Techdirt articles.
Let me say this about that:right You meant Liberal, and you use all those other lame PC terms as well, showing that you are and meant to be.... a liberal. You're welcome.
It's amazing to get so much wrong in so short a post.
right You meant Liberal,
The two words are not interchangeable any more than Conservative and Alt-Right are.
It's amazing to get so much wrong in so short a post.
Hillary didn't screw Bernie in any way. The DNC prefered her as a candidate, sure. But the real issue is that Sanders didn't get enough votes to overturn that preference. Any other claim is Sanders-biased conspiracy theory.
As for your last comment, it's true that Hillary's campaign was weak and unenthousiastic, but Bernie did much to damage it: first, by playging into Republican talking points about her, and second, Sanders refusing to give up his candidacy well after the point where his loss was obvious.
So in yet another case of projection, the denial is yours.
Yes they are
By which you mean Sanders had a campaign that pushed for change, and many wanted that change and Hag was in the way.
I don't know. You keep refering to Trump as Trump and Clinton as "hag", despite you claiming that she would've been better than he is.
If you really believe that she put a server in the restroom, then you'll believe any stupid story.
right You meant Liberal, and you use all those other lame PC terms as well, showing that you are and meant to be.... a liberal. You're welcome.
They have absolutely nothing to do with one another. You simply don't know what those words mean.
You are clearly entirely in the right-wing bubble, and can't see the world outside of it. If you were a better person you'd ask in what way you're wrong.
On the odd chance that you're not completely lost to reason, look up progressivism and liberalism. You might want to look up conservatism as well, just to be on the safe side.
*blinks*
Yes they are, Liberal is the one that got dirty so it was repackage into a less honest version, but it remains, liberal.
Eye drops might help that nervous tick you have.
Eye drops might help that nervous tick you have.