• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Is James Woolsey MEGA?

MaGZ

Philosopher
MaGZ
Joined
Jan 31, 2007
Messages
6,917
Is James Woolsey the former CIA head also MEGA the top Israeli operative in America?

Article on MEGA
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2001/2833mega_spy.html
From wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Woolsey
As Director of Central Intelligence, Woolsey is notable for having a very limited relationship with President Bill Clinton. According to journalist Richard Miniter:
Never once in his two-year tenure did CIA director James Woolsey ever have a one-on-one meeting with Clinton. Even semiprivate meetings were rare. They only happened twice. Woolsey told me: "It wasn't that I had a bad relationship with the president. It just didn't exist."
​
Another quote about his relationship with Clinton, according to Paula Kaufman of Insight Magazine:
Remember the guy who in 1994 crashed his plane onto the White House lawn? That was me trying to get an appointment to see President Clinton.
​
David Halberstam notes in War in a Time of Peace that Clinton chose Woolsey for CIA director because the Clinton campaign had courted neoconservatives leading up to the 1992 election, promising to be tougher on Taiwan, Bosnia, and human rights in China, and it was decided that they ought to give at least one neoconservative a job in the administration.
Click to expand...

Could the reason Clinton refused to meet with Woolsey is he knew he placed a foreign intelligence operative as head of the CIA?
Was Clinton seeking plausible deniablity if Woolsey was ever exposed?
 
No, I am. And I don't even live in the US. I'm that good.

Oh, and MaGZ, stop touching yourself so much. It's unhealthy. We're watching you.
 
There has to be something missing here. You've read the allegation that Woolsey didn't speak much to Clinton and that has made you wonder whether he this was because Clinton wanted plausible deniability that Woolsey was an Israeli operative.

I can't see how you go from one to the other.
 
Well you see, gtc, it's the CT/antisemite version of the believer's God of the Gaps. We'll call it the Jew of the Gaps. (In certain areas - notably the Five Towns of Long Island - this particular term might appear tautological, but rest assured that some of them favor Bennetton over GAP. Or at least they did back when I was in junior high.)

This Jew of the Gaps phenomenon appears mostly through innuendo. A tenuous connection is made less so in the CT mind by plugging a Jew or Jewish plot into the gap, but seldom, if ever, through direct evidence. Rather, the existence of this Jewish connection is derived indirectly, much in the way a traffic signal indicates the presence of wind chimes (an analogy I challenge you to find elsewhere on the web; you read it here first).

This Jew of the Gaps becomes quite handy in explaining (away) all sorts of CT elements - especially cover-up operations. These Jews of the Gaps are shadowy - so shadowy, in fact that, like shadows, they disappear when anyone shines real light on the subject in order to test for their presence.
 
MaGz, congratuations. Your obsessive and pathethic need to constantly attack Israel and Jew..has qualified you to be on my ignore list. See ya in Valhalla.
 
So, Clinton knowingly gave a high ranking foreign intelligence agent the top spy job so he could have plausible deniability?
And it even mentions Clinton gave the job to Woolsey to appease the neocons, his biggest opponents. That, mixed in with the accusations of him being light on the intelligence community, kind of give better reasons for the two having little direct contact.
 
Why do I think this is going to play the 'degree of separation' game with Grassy Knolls?
 
I wish there had been a little less sarcasm and a little bit more substance in this thread.

If it is completely implausible that Woolsey was an Israel spy, could somebody make that case?

Is the premise of the article that there was a spy in the CIA higher placed than Pallard plausible and is the CIA still trying to figure out who it was?

It does seem that some segment of the Israeli army intentionally attempted to sink a US ship and murder its crew and an American president (Johnson) ordered a sham investigation to cover it up. Given the amazingly implausible nature of that situation is it reasonable to rule out something like this because on the surface it seems unlikely?
 
Last edited:
Davefoc, you're the one who seems to want to make 3 cases. Please proceed. I look forward to your evidence and tightly reasoned explanation. Please as well provide your reasoning as to why anyone should listen to the thunderings of Magz, a well known Jew-baiter hereabouts.
 
davefoc,

It is not up to us to show that it is implausible that Woolsey is a spy, anymore than it is up to us to show that George W Bush, Hillary Clinton and your goodself are not spies for Israel.

If someone wants to suggest that Woolsey is a spy then they need to provide evidence. At the moment all we have is that Clinton apparently did not get along with Woolsey and that proves precisely nothing.

Oh, I also presume that James Woolsey is Jewish as this would explain MaGZ's interest in him. But that doesn't prove anything either.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom