Tsukasa Buddha
Other (please write in)
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2006
- Messages
- 15,302
I know early settlers seemed to resort to eating all sorts of inedible things due to their starvation, which would support physical and not metabolic satiation. That is an extreme case, but the idea could translate to the opposite condition of surplus. That is, eating high volume, low calorie foods to "trick" the body.
Obviously, I am not the first person to think of this. But my Googling leads to... unreliable sources. Obviously the two are greatly overlapped, so there is perhaps not much utility in the notion even if correct.
I also recall that there are calorie negative foods, which I am guessing are too minor to make a significant dent for anti-obesity dieting, but I think those wouldn't make one hungrier
.
Tangentially related, I also thought about nutritional density, but that was more concerning limited income diets, and I see websites of poor repute have already stolen my idea
.
Obviously, I am not the first person to think of this. But my Googling leads to... unreliable sources. Obviously the two are greatly overlapped, so there is perhaps not much utility in the notion even if correct.
I also recall that there are calorie negative foods, which I am guessing are too minor to make a significant dent for anti-obesity dieting, but I think those wouldn't make one hungrier
Tangentially related, I also thought about nutritional density, but that was more concerning limited income diets, and I see websites of poor repute have already stolen my idea
