The honest confusion comes into play when the classical homeopaths are taught to ONLY treat according to the symptoms. At least this is what I gathered from the discussions here on homeopathy over the past year or so (do check the link in Rolfe's sig).
This was very evident after my oldest child had a complaint that he could not run much... and when he did his left arm would hurt. At first we thought (including our family doc) that it was because it was the arm he injured when he fell a few months before.
BUT... during a regular well-child physical the doctor heard a heart murmur. This was new... and something no homeopath would find out since none would use a stethoscope (they just sit and talk to the patient for an hour or so). So an echocardiogram was set up... where a video of how his heard was actually working was made (takes a half to a whole hour).
It was there that the initial diagnosis of a genetic heart disorder was found. Then he was referred to a pediatric heart specialist... where ANOTHER echocardiogram was given, a chest X-ray and three different EKG's (a normal one, another where he was on a treadmill, and another that required him to wear for 24 hours a holter... not a mis-spelling -- it is device that records the EKG). The EKG leads are placed on his chest, neck, arm and ankle.
Now please note how much of a difference that is in treating the WHOLE body... versus a homeopath or other alt-medder claims. (also the family doc gave us a referral to a counselor, because let's face it... this is not a diagnosis a teenager likes to deal with).
I've discussed this with some of the homeopaths on this board (do a search) and I have yet to get a definite answer on how a homeopathic remedy would be better than Atenolol... or even if it could do anything. It is often amusing.