icerat
Philosopher
Let's say Coke went crazy and adopted Amway's business model. The price they sell to distributors at would have to go up substantially so that they could pay bonuses. Thus, the retail price would go up. No one is going to buy a $3 can of Coke at their supermarket; that would be a scam -like when you go to a hotel for a can of soda.
Furthermore, Coca-Cola would not sell anywhere near the level they sell now if they went to direct retail sales. Manufacturer-regional distributor-retail is a much more efficient model for the level of sales we are talking about with Coca-Cola.
Well this is similar for Amway. As per FTC vs Amway, manufacturer-direct distributor-retailer-customer covers the majority of Amway.
Remember, Coca-Cola also has the marketing expenses, not just distribution, tied in to their price, that money is directed in to bonuses by Amway. Indeed in modern MLM the distribution model is mostly manufacturer->customer, it's the marketing expenses that go to compensation.
A direct sales model makes sense only when you are trying to push niche products with a limited market. I'm struggling to find a situation when a pyramid-style compensation system ever makes sense.
Direct sales doesn't make sense on low margin products, no. Direct sales makes sense on high margin products where having a sales person be able to demonstrate or otherwise teach the buyer features and benefits that differentiate from competitors. Things like vacuum cleaners were initially marketed through direct sales (electrolux even had an mlm type of compensation plan). Once a product becomes well known though, and competition cuts in to the margins, direct sales is no longer a particularly useful model for that product.
You might want to draw out that coca-cola distribution model you outlined. You'll find it's far more "pyramid" like than your average Amway network.