Merged "Iron-rich spheres" - scienctific explanation?

Edx said:
Dont want to speak for others, but what I know is Jones has both said that nano thermite was can be painted onto steel and that doing this makes it become a high explosives when dry (in the Jesse Ventura show where they painted it on steel and nothing happened but they didnt notice, LOLOLOLOLOL) and then in an email exchange with Frank Greening he said that they were only used as matches for conventional explosives like C4.
Click to expand...
Jones is hoping "truthers" don't care about these things. He's right.
 
Visit http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gijCzs9SWH4 and go about 7:45 in. No one in 9/11 Truth has ever tried to rebut this direct testimony, to my knowledge
Click to expand...
,

What part exactly do you mean?? I don't really here you say anything in regards to how concrete could have/ did melt.

so I remain very skeptical (as in open only a small crack) to claims of concrete-melting temps.
Click to expand...

Chris, how can you be skeptical when the NYPD museum has melted concrete, from the WTC complexes, in a display case?

The fact it was from WTC 6 means nothing. It was at the site.

That right there proves it was there that day.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
,

What part exactly do you mean?? I don't really here you say anything in regards to how concrete could have/ did melt.



Chris, how can you be skeptical when the NYPD museum has melted concrete, from the WTC complexes, in a display case?

The fact it was from WTC 6 means nothing. It was at the site.

That right there proves it was there that day.
Click to expand...

There was thermite in WTC 6?
 
QUOTE] You guys quote people talking about melted steel (and here concrete) as if its very strange because it doesnt normally get reported in fires, but it does get reported in other fires all the time, which means the reports are not strange on 911, they are expected!
Click to expand...
[/QUOTE]

I can't believe the words that just came out of your mouth. Show me that that it is a normal thing for steel and concrete to melt in a fire.

Especially concrete.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
I can't believe the words that just came out of your mouth. Show me that that it is a normal thing for steel and concrete to melt in a fire.

Especially concrete.
Click to expand...

Would you please read the words that I am typing?

I am saying it is common to find those reports, which means people make that mistake all the time. We should expect the same mistakes on 911.

Why did you snip the whole of my post just to cherry pick one sentence and then misread it? If you read the whole of my post theres no way you could misunderstand.
 
Last edited:
superlogicalthinker said:
,
Chris, how can you be skeptical when the NYPD museum has melted concrete, from the WTC complexes, in a display case?
Click to expand...

As I said in my post you ignored:

"
And btw, that picture that was posted is not verified melted concrete. Its just a plack on the wall that says it is. We have established that stuff like this is incorrectly reported all the time, there is also the fact that if its so obvious a fire without thermite can't do that to concrete then why the hell are all these people so blase about it? If they know what they are talking about enough to say that its definitely melted concrete then why don't they know what that means? And while we're on the subject, why are they allowed to have such an exhibit when according to you its so obvious that this melted concrete means thermite had to be present? Why didnt the black ops team swoop in and stop them and deny any such materials existed? "
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
prove that :D Again no debunkers is claiming that 6% is unusual so we have nothing to prove.....only you do.
Click to expand...
[/QUOTE]


Chris Mohr:

"Since it looks like there are lots of micro spheres in the dust, as much as 6% micro spheres but maybe less, I just don't believe we have fully accounted for this high a quantity yet."

Sounds like a debunker thinks it's "unusual".

You like to pass the ball eh?
 
superlogicalthinker said:
Chris Mohr:

"Since it looks like there are lots of micro spheres in the dust, as much as 6% micro spheres but maybe less, I just don't believe we have fully accounted for this high a quantity yet."

Sounds like a debunker thinks it's "unusual".

You like to pass the ball eh?
Click to expand...

Chris Mohr is not a scientist and I would say still a bit too gullible (no offence) in the claims of the truth movement.

You guys have referenced the RJ Lee report as an authority several times in this thread, Christopher even wrote a post asking why should we question what they say, that you applauded. Yet RJ Lee, you know "the experts" and report you've been quoting, are the ones that said it was "expected". So this makes them totally incompetent doesn't it?

Why is it no expert outside the tiny fringe circle of "truthers" sees this as strange? When even the experts you're trying to cite as sources don't agree with you?
 
Last edited:
"Since it looks like there are lots of micro spheres in the dust, as much as 6% micro spheres but maybe less, I just don't believe we have fully accounted for this high a quantity yet."
Sounds like a debunker thinks it's "unusual".
Click to expand...

Is English your primary language?
 
chrismohr said:
Hi SLT,

Water can't melt concrete, but water can gradually erode it. Someone mentioned the melty-shaped concrete you sometimes see on beaches and I think gradual erosion would be the cause of that, not melting.
Click to expand...

Would have taken too long.

I am asking for a concrete chunk from Dr. Millette, and yes, there are thousands of chunks of concrete in the rubble.
Click to expand...

What about getting a sample of the "steel/concrete gun" ?( if you will)


Check out the picture at around 3:45 in my YouTube video on this subject:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD0zg1OwBSo
I hope you'll watch the whole video, it has a lot of compelling arguments!
Click to expand...

I watch all your stuff from begining to end.

The police museum picture is entered into evidence but not accepted by me as proof because police museum curators are not experts in metallurgy etc so they may well have made a mistake.
Click to expand...

Would they not have had to research how it happened first? Isn't there a law to prevent false information from being put out to the public ?

The percentage of iron-rich microspheres is 6% tops, maybe 1 or 2% according to Oystein. Any of these figures still seems high to me.
Click to expand...

Is Oystien quailfied to make that prediction.?

BTW SLT someone claimed recently that Steven Jones "backed down" from his nanothermite claims. Is this true? Are there links you or anyone else knows of that show that the Bentham research has been updated with new data or new interpretations? It's very important Dr. Millette has this because he is following the protocol of the original Bentham study.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

I will find out and get back to you.
 
NoahFence said:
You're missing words again. These words are important.

For instance, Your post should read "Not to MY satisfaction".

the interesting part is, you don't matter.

So who cares if it was to your satisfaction?
Click to expand...

No I wrote it correct the first time. it's not just me who feel this way.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
Would they not have had to research how it happened first? Isn't there a law to prevent false information from being put out to the public ?
Click to expand...

LOL. Really? You actually think that?

In what way would it be illegal?

People, as i said, have in the past made the mistake of thinking things have melted in fires like steel, when they probably did not, hundreds of times before. Even fire chiefs and fire experts making the same mistakes by saying fire melted steel and so on. Maybe you think they should be arrested for putting out false information! :D
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom