It looks like widespread power outages that will take a long time to fix are going to be the major story of Irma's impact. Except on the Keys, where we don't know yet what the impacts have been.
(I've been fooled before in the first 48 hours after tsunamis, earthquakes, hurricanes and so forth in thinking "it must not have been so bad," because it takes at least that long for news of the worst impacts to come to light.)
There will be some backlash against the evacuations. I've already heard some people predicting that some future hurricane will have more casualties, because people will remember being "unnecessarily" stuck on highways, having to abandon their cars, etc. due to the uncertainty of the forecast, and stay put instead.
However, I think nowadays, so many people have no clue about how to meet their basic needs without electricity that the power outages alone will make most of the evacuations worthwhile in the balance.
I hope meteorologists will carefully study why the various models were so consistently off in the same direction, and learn from that. I understand that input data is uncertain and incomplete, and the granularity of the models and the inherent chaotic nature of weather systems introduces more uncertainty. But in this case the models were in agreement with each other, but wrong, over and over, even about what was going to happen in the next six hours. It seems as though some significant variable is being overlooked.
(I've been fooled before in the first 48 hours after tsunamis, earthquakes, hurricanes and so forth in thinking "it must not have been so bad," because it takes at least that long for news of the worst impacts to come to light.)
There will be some backlash against the evacuations. I've already heard some people predicting that some future hurricane will have more casualties, because people will remember being "unnecessarily" stuck on highways, having to abandon their cars, etc. due to the uncertainty of the forecast, and stay put instead.
However, I think nowadays, so many people have no clue about how to meet their basic needs without electricity that the power outages alone will make most of the evacuations worthwhile in the balance.
I hope meteorologists will carefully study why the various models were so consistently off in the same direction, and learn from that. I understand that input data is uncertain and incomplete, and the granularity of the models and the inherent chaotic nature of weather systems introduces more uncertainty. But in this case the models were in agreement with each other, but wrong, over and over, even about what was going to happen in the next six hours. It seems as though some significant variable is being overlooked.