Toontown
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2010
- Messages
- 6,595
It should be easy enough for you to source the claim that rėgime change was an allied war aim.
Well, yes, but so glaringly obvious I almost forgot to jump through that somewhat desperate-appearing hoop.
http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/vi...06361.001.0001/acprof-9780198206361-chapter-8
The heterogeneous alliance that defeated the Axis states in the Second World War was united by its determination to demand the unconditional surrender of the enemy powers and to prevent their resurgence. For Russia, the war was a struggle for survival in which many of its great cities were destroyed and some 20 million people died. The Western democracies saw it as a crusade against the forces of evil. The allied leaders, Josef Stalin of Russia, Winston Churchill of Britain, and Franklin D. Roosevelt of the United States, agreed that enemy governments should be removed and Nazism and Facism should be eradicated.
It seems so elementary to me that such regimes must be eradicated, that I find it incomprehensible that it needs such tedious justifying, explaining, and citing.
Unless I speculate that all political forums are deeply infested with trolls, many of whom do a fair job of concealing their manic trolling behavior behind a mask of ideological concern. Then it all makes a kind of insane sense, in troll-think, if I also speculate that these trolls are bored paraplegics.
Or maybe most of them are denizens of Russian troll houses, paid by Putin & Co. to make crazy seem normal.
Last edited: