Iran War in Prophecy

pandamonk · Apr 17, 2007

Davidjayjordan said:
Yup I thought and was prepared that the British attempt to start the war by isolating its solder for capture would start the war. But it didn;t turn out that way, and yet that wasn;t a prophecy. My prophecy is that there will be an Iranian War. If you say NO, then that is your prophecy and we shall see who is right.

H. you have to decide and quite pointing fingers. You are the one responsible for your own life, not me. Prophecy is not a game of accussations but a serious study of the future by the one who DESIGNED HIS-story and the future.

If you differ, your choice. If I say war and you say peace. One of us is wrong.

I say war in iran and the excuse will come in His TIME.

But the Covenant has to be signed by 2009.

OMG, he admitted he was wrong! But not that it was prophecy. "This is not a specific prophecy, but a logical rational spiritual deductive one". Did your logical, rational, spiritual, and deductive side let you down then?

Davidjayjordan · Apr 17, 2007

pandamonk said:
OMG, he admitted he was wrong! But not that it was prophecy. "This is not a specific prophecy, but a logical rational spiritual deductive one". Did your logical, rational, spiritual, and deductive side let you down then?

That's mockery of my person, and it is not suppose to be allowed.

Attack the message and not the messenger, as Darat has stated. But then again it appears anti-truthers have certain rights and priviledges and can slander without penalty while truthers can not.

No wonder my (....) was (....)

When someone takes an educated spiritual rational guess it is not prophecy. prophecy is the direct words of the Lord, or when someone says Thus saith the Lord.

I will say, Thus saith the Lord about an Iran War, and a Covenant in 2009.

When it happens will you deem yourselves false prophets or deem me a true prophet ? I doubt it, you will just go on in your doubts, as false skeptics whole faith is in doubts.

Davidjayjordan · Apr 17, 2007

Björn Toulouse said:
So the building is finally complete now. All of those previous dates were just part of the "building blocks", even though you failed to note that to others when you posted them at the time; you just let everyone think that was the final product.

There might be a war with USA v Iran. Why not? But it isn't predicted in the Bible. The voices told you that. Of course there will be more earthquakes - there are always earthquakes. Plagues- i have an idea that is a subjective topic on your part.

Covenant in 2009 - total NAHHH ! Reason: your own history of failed predictions.

NO, prophecy is never completed until everything is finnished and fulfilled totally.

We ALL are suppose to hear from the Lord. All of us, no one is suppose to hear for everyone else. WE ALL NEED SPECIFIC DIRECT INTRUCTIONS on what to do and when in the future according to our specific situation. We have to personnally learn to HEAR from the Lord and follow the Lord. If people have NOT got the ears to hear they are not of the Lord. Others can NOT hear for you personnally Bjorn.

Joe 2:28¶And it shall come to pass afterward, [that] I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions:

Joe 2:29And also upon the servants and upon the handmaids in those days will I pour out my spirit.

Younjg old, men, women, ALL will have to learn to prophesy, because prophesy means hearing straight from the Lord, irregardless of what Bible they are reading or have read, or have NOT read. The Lord will speak to them directly, if they have esyablished their FAITH in the real god, rather than the god of this world and his materialism and his fear and his insanities of thought.

Prophecy is step by step. The major events and details may be given already by Old time Prophets, and I do mean almost everyone of the prophets in the Old and New testament, but we piece them together and we in the End Time get MORE. Because we are the ones that have to go through the End Time.

And it won;t be a throw of the dice or probability like you imagine Bjorn.

pandamonk · Apr 17, 2007

Davidjayjordan said:
That's mockery of my person, and it is not suppose to be allowed.

Attack the message and not the messenger, as Darat has stated. But then again it appears anti-truthers have certain rights and priviledges and can slander without penalty while truthers can not.

No wonder my (....) was (....)

When someone takes an educated spiritual rational guess it is not prophecy. prophecy is the direct words of the Lord, or when someone says Thus saith the Lord.

I will say, Thus saith the Lord about an Iran War, and a Covenant in 2009.

When it happens will you deem yourselves false prophets or deem me a true prophet ? I doubt it, you will just go on in your doubts, as false skeptics whole faith is in doubts.

In whay way is it mockery? What i did was ask you a question based on your statements, of which i quoted. I am attacking the message. Your message was that you were prophesizing "logical rational spiritual [and] deductive", and not from the "Lord". And i commented that you admitted you got it wrong. I asked if your "logical rational spiritual [and] deductive" parts let you down. Did they? So i attacked the message and not the messenger.

And if there is an iranian war, i won't say that you are right. I think there will be, but this is not based on anything spiritual.

Davidjayjordan · Apr 17, 2007

H. I know it must thrill your soul, everytime you call me a false prophet, and it musty encourage you no end. But I said the British soldier capture COULD be the excuse that starts the war. I did not say it was, but COULD BE, that's hardly prophecy.

Prophecy would state, it WILL BE.

The original posting was word for word.

Iran War in Prophecy
Because a war with Iran is needed to bring the whole world into desperately searching for a COVENANT to bring the world back from a near WW3. Maybe we can discuss why the upcoming Iranian War is being set up and then discuss its ramifications even as it is going on.

So to start, the powers that be always need an excuse to go to war..

And so surely this could be that excuse as posted today..

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070323/...sh_troops_iran

LONDON - Iranian naval vessels seized 15 British sailors in Iraqi waters on Friday, the Ministry of Defense said.
[SIZE=-2]ADVERTISEMENT[/SIZE]

if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object();window.yzq_d['n68qLdGDJH0-']='&U=13bksl6go%2fN%3dn68qLdGDJH0-%2fC%3d578388.10451389.11083678.1414694%2fD%3dLREC %2fB%3d4318112';

The British Navy personnel were "engaged in routine boarding operations of merchant shipping in Iraqi territorial waters," and had completed their inspection of a merchant ship when they were accosted by Iranian vessels, the ministry said.
"We are urgently pursuing this matter with the Iranian authorities at the highest level and ... the Iranian ambassador has been summoned to the Foreign Office," the ministry said. Pentagon official said the Britons were in two inflatable boats from the frigate H.M.S. Cornwall during a routine smuggling investigation, said the official, who spoke on condition on anonymity because he was not authorized to speak about the incident.
He said the confrontation happened as the British contingent was traveling along the boundary of territorial waters between Iraq. They were detained by the Revolutionary Guard's navy, he said.
A fisherman who said he was with a group of Iraqis from the southern city of Basra fishing in Iraqi waters in the northern area of the Gulf said he saw the Iranian seizure. The fisherman declined to be identified because of security concerns.
"Two boats, each with a crew of six to eight multinational forces, were searching Iraqi and Iranian boats Friday morning in Ras al-Beesha area in the northern entrance of the Arab Gulf, but big Iranian boats came and took the two boats with their crews to the Iranian waters."
The Britain government said it had demanded "the immediate and safe return of our people and equipment."

And it just so happens by luck and chance the Americans have their air craft carriers in place..... or was it by design... for their comrades the British

Davidjayjordan · Apr 17, 2007

pandamonk said:
In whay way is it mockery? What i did was ask you a question based on your statements, of which i quoted. I am attacking the message. Your message was that you were prophesizing "logical rational spiritual [and] deductive", and not from the "Lord". And i commented that you admitted you got it wrong. I asked if your "logical rational spiritual [and] deductive" parts let you down. Did they? So i attacked the message and not the messenger.

And if there is an Iranian war, i won't say that you are right. I think there will be, but this is not based on anything spiritual.

I just wanted to remind you of the RULES even though they seem to be applied (........) when ever the (.....) need to (......) a truth or a winning (....).

Because Yes, Panda, you didn't call me a false prophet which is the norm.

And apparrently I can not call you guys and gals, False prophets because you preach peace and safety. As a (...) might be listening or (....)

And apparrently we can not start heated debates in a friendly manner as that would mean the thread would get (.....) if it dealt with a (....) topic against (.....)

pandamonk · Apr 17, 2007

Davidjayjordan said:
I just wanted to remind you of the RULES even though they seem to be applied (........) when ever the (.....) need to (......) a truth or a winning (....).

Because Yes, Panda, you didn't call me a false prophet which is the norm.

And apparrently I can not call you guys and gals, False prophets because you preach peace and safety. As a (...) might be listening or (....)

And apparrently we can not start heated debates in a friendly manner as that would mean the thread would get (.....) if it dealt with a (....) topic against (.....)

Sorry, I'm having trouble reading and understanding with the (....)s.

Davidjayjordan · Apr 17, 2007

Davidjayjordan · Apr 17, 2007

pandamonk said:
Sorry, I'm having trouble reading and understanding with the (....)s.

As you know full well, Panda, I can not tell you what words lie within the (...) as that would get this thread deleted as well.

pandamonk · Apr 17, 2007

Davidjayjordan said:
As you know full well, Panda, I can not tell you what words lie within the (...) as that would get this thread deleted as well.

PM me with your post minus the (...)s, and I'll reply here.

Athyrio · Apr 17, 2007

Davidjayjordan said:
Its not funny but will happen. See todays news, as they will soon forget where the Brits were, and blame the Iranians for not relaeassing those that invaded their territorial waters. Iran will refuse to let them go, and we have the EXCUSE the Illuminati set up.

But I said the British soldier capture COULD be the excuse that starts the war. I did not say it was, but COULD BE, that's hardly prophecy.

Are you talking about two separate wars between USA and Iran, because in the 1st quote you dropped the coulds and used WILL in this same thread?

Foster Zygote · Apr 17, 2007

Davidjayjordan said:
Calling my 'ilk' is name calling slander. You are being reported.

And yet surely shall be protected, we shall see. darat's wants proper discussions, obey the rules.

David, you've called people wimps, told them to "have some balls", insinuated that they were sexually inadequate, etc. etc. etc...

So get over it.

Foster Zygote · Apr 17, 2007

Davidjayjordan said:
Unlike you know it all's, who get overnight revelations, the Lord works precept by precept, principle by principle, step by step.

It's a building, a construction, little by little to establish a complete and strong framework, seasoned with erxperiences and confirmations and testings for strength etc.

So He gives a little at a time, and to me it was time line by time line, as I put them on-line on my website.

So I put the years when they were received on line,

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/ProphecyTimeLines.html

But we aren't talking about you gradually filling in unknown dates. We're talking about you making a complete time-line with dates and then changing those dates when the original dates passed without fulfilling your prophecy. You made a prophecy about events running from 2002 to 2009. This prophecy has failed showing you to be a false prophet so, according to your own source material, we fear you not.

Foster Zygote · Apr 17, 2007

Davidjayjordan said:
Because Yes, Panda, you didn't call me a false prophet which is the norm.

It is the norm to call you a "false prophet" because you have made a prophecy that failed to come true.

And apparrently I can not call you guys and gals, False prophets because you preach peace and safety.

You cannot call us "false prophets" because we haven't made any prophecies. Saying "War is possible, but I disagree with your certainty that it will happen" is not a prophecy. Surely this has been explained enough times that you should be able to comprehend it by now.

I defy you to provide one example of someone in this thread stating that a war between the United States and Iran will never happen.

Paulhoff · Apr 17, 2007

No, it is not like that DJJ….

DJJ “quote the man-made bible again as a fact from a so-called god”

No, it is not like that DJJ…..

DJJ “quote the man-made bible again as a fact from a so-called god”

No, it………..

Paul

Cosmo · Apr 17, 2007

Davidjayjordan said:
I just wanted to remind you of the RULES even though they seem to be applied (........) when ever the (.....) need to (......) a truth or a winning (....).

Because Yes, Panda, you didn't call me a false prophet which is the norm.

And apparrently I can not call you guys and gals, False prophets because you preach peace and safety. As a (...) might be listening or (....)

And apparrently we can not start heated debates in a friendly manner as that would mean the thread would get (.....) if it dealt with a (....) topic against (.....)

I LOVE mad libs!

I just wanted to remind you of the RULES even though they seem to be applied lusciously when ever the frogs need to masticate a truth or a winning AK-47.

Because Yes, Panda, you didn't call me a false prophet which is the norm.

And apparrently I can not call you guys and gals, False prophets because you preach peace and safety. As a corvette might be listening or New Jersey

And apparrently we can not start heated debates in a friendly manner as that would mean the thread would get perverted if it dealt with a shiny topic against spyware

Foster Zygote · Apr 17, 2007

My turn!

I just wanted to remind you of the RULES even though they seem to be applied applicably when ever the Papists need to Simonize a truth or a winning marital aid.

Because Yes, Panda, you didn't call me a false prophet which is the norm.

And apparrently I can not call you guys and gals, False prophets because you preach peace and safety. As a llama might be listening or spanking the monkey.

And apparrently we can not start heated debates in a friendly manner as that would mean the thread would get undressed if it dealt with a Rat Pack topic against Ike Turner.

pchams · Apr 17, 2007

Fun...

I just wanted to remind you of the RULES even though they seem to be applied posthumously when ever the deceased's followers need to manufacture a truth or a winning jihad.

Because Yes, Panda, you didn't call me a false prophet which is the norm.

And apparrently I can not call you guys and gals, False prophets because you preach peace and safety. As a reasonable person might be listening or thinking.

Hokulele · Apr 17, 2007

Davidjayjordan said:
H. I know it must thrill your soul, everytime you call me a false prophet, and it musty encourage you no end. But I said the British soldier capture COULD be the excuse that starts the war. I did not say it was, but COULD BE, that's hardly prophecy.

Prophecy would state, it WILL BE.

Will be. Got it.

Davidjayjordan said:
O.K. back to the British captives that were sent into Iranuian waters to be captured, as inflatables don;t wander away from their own protective vessels. It was a set up and these 15 were withdrawn from so they would be captured....

Blair wants them back, and A... says they are safe... so where do they get their nice safe detention... probably around the different nuclear sites , so that America will be tempted not to blow them up when they nuke them into oblivion.

I think the Arabs did this once before..

As for A, he's being manipulated by the religious on his side to... something about the 12th Imman... prophecy, meaning he will try to fulfill his supposed destiny by starting a war.

So both religious sides will have positioned themselves and will have their supposed religious basis for going to war... all with excuses, and then the war will be on.

Sorry you status quo fellows, and you false prophets of peace and safety, your prophecies of peace and no war shall vanish...and we ALL had better smarten up to the cons of the governments and listen a whole lot more to the solutions of the Lord.

Hokulele · Apr 17, 2007

Excellent!

I just wanted to remind you of the RULES even though they seem to be applied organically when ever the Pittsburgh Steelers need to regenerate a truth or a winning pass play.

Because Yes, Panda, you didn't call me a false prophet which is the norm.

And apparrently I can not call you guys and gals, False prophets because you preach peace and safety. As a foosball table might be listening or crocheting

And apparrently we can not start heated debates in a friendly manner as that would mean the thread would get hotwired if it dealt with a Lilliputian topic against microbreweries

Iran War in Prophecy

Critical Thinker

Banned

Banned

Critical Thinker

Banned

Banned

Critical Thinker

Banned

Banned

Critical Thinker

Hipster Doofus

Dental Floss Tycoon

Dental Floss Tycoon

Dental Floss Tycoon

You can't expect perfection.

Radioactive Rationalist

Dental Floss Tycoon

Muse

Deleterious Slab of Damnation

Deleterious Slab of Damnation