Iran resumes nuclear activities

Orwell said:
Why are you noting "obligatory digs" at the US, Ed? Are you compiling a list of "enemies of the US" or something?

If they are obligatory, am I in trouble for not including one?
 
Orwell said:
Why are you noting "obligatory digs" at the US, Ed? Are you compiling a list of "enemies of the US" or something?

It's a way of noting inflammatory but empty rhetoric without responding in kind.
 
Orwell said:
Why are you noting "obligatory digs" at the US, Ed? Are you compiling a list of "enemies of the US" or something?

No, it just occurs with tedious regularity.
 
Jaggy Bunnet said:
If they are obligatory, am I in trouble for not including one?

Depends. If you have nothing that particularly contributes then it is, else not. It is when you find yourself creatively berift that it assumes the nature of an obligation. It can also be a tic, something sort of uncontrollable but that is a late stage manifestation.
 
Rob Lister said:
that's my job. You're on the list but, being as you are canadian, you're way, way down there.

...as they are - and should be - on every list they appear on.

I proudly declare my unreasonable loathing for Canadians. If only those with unreasonable loathing for Americans could be so honest, this forum could save a lot of space. ;)
 
Ed said:
How? The UN?

It worked to get the Iraqi army out of Kuwait, didn't it? I realise that your current set of talking points says that the UN and France are bad this year, but I would have thought you would have remembered the first Gulf War.

It sounds like most or all of the Security Council is at least taking an interest in what Iran is up to.

Obligatory dig at the US noted.

Obligatory attempt to make this about personalities rather than facts observed. Start a thread in the flame forum if that's your idea of intelligent discussion of important current events.
 
Rob Lister said:
that's my job. You're on the list but, being as you are canadian, you're way, way down there.

What If I tell you that I have Arab ancestors? Will I climb up on that list? ;)
 
Jocko said:
...as they are - and should be - on every list they appear on.

I proudly declare my unreasonable loathing for Canadians. If only those with unreasonable loathing for Americans could be so honest, this forum could save a lot of space. ;)

Well, Jocko, I must then declare my reasonable loathing for you. By the way, I don't loath americans in general, far from it. Just you. ;) For now, at least.

It is pretty rare that someone just comes out and declares himself a bigot! It's kind of refreshing!

So, who else suffers from an unreasonable loathing for Canadians? :D
 
Rob Lister said:
As a canadian? no.

Damn! Well, on the bright side, if even paranoid americans don't consider me a threat, then there's a good chance no-one will. I feel safer already! :p
 
Kevin_Lowe said:
It worked to get the Iraqi army out of Kuwait, didn't it? I realise that your current set of talking points says that the UN and France are bad this year, but I would have thought you would have remembered the first Gulf War.

It sounds like most or all of the Security Council is at least taking an interest in what Iran is up to.



Obligatory attempt to make this about personalities rather than facts observed. Start a thread in the flame forum if that's your idea of intelligent discussion of important current events.

May I invite you to do the same if you feel the need to reflexively flame the US?
 
It worked to get the Iraqi army out of Kuwait, didn't it?

Er, no. That liberation--as usual--90% the US's army effort, just as it was in Korea, Yugoslavia, and so on. If the US had not joined the war, the UN would have been impotent to do anything about it. How well the UN handles cases without the US's involvement can be seen by looking at (pre-US-invasion) Yugoslavia, Sudan, Rwanda, etc., etc., etc.

Whenever the UN is succesful, it is almost invariably because it is really the US armed forces--and, sometimes, with another free nation or two--acting under a nominal and worthless UN "leadership".

Obligatory attempt to make this about personalities rather than facts observed.

Well, that's because you have an odd personality. You accept conspiracy theories about "stolen elections" about the US president as gospel truth, but accept the word of President "we will kill all the jews in a nuclear holocaust" Rafsanjani & co. as somehow reliable.

Go figure.
 
Rob Lister said:
3.321021331 billion actually. Barely half your number. Get your facts straight dude!

Why that particular number? I though everyone was against you!
 
Orwell said:
Why that particular number? I though everyone was against you!

Just half. Roughly.

We'll get to you. You may be eighty and using a walker but...we'll get to you. :)
 
geni said:
Israel has balistic missiles while it proably isn't enough to totaly stop Iran's program forever it would by time.
I doubt aerial bombardment would do anything but stir up the hornets nest, the important facilities are too deeply buried. It would require troops on the ground, unfortunately, IMHO.
 
Rob Lister said:
Just half. Roughly.

We'll get to you. You may be eighty and using a walker but...we'll get to you. :)
That reminds me of the Portuguese mafia. Have you ever heard of them? Very secretive organisation. Nobody knows who they are. In spite of the name, you don't have to be portuguese to be in it! Some people are part of the portuguese mafia, and they don't even know it! if you betray them you're screwed. They always get their man (or woman). It might take decades, but in the end, they'll get you. It will look like a heart attack, a disease, an accident, it could be anything, but it will be them getting their revenge on you. Beware of the Portuguese mafia!
 
Geez, of all the threads to go off topic. Do you people have any idea how few people know how much gas Nigeria flares? Ph34r my 1337 g33k ci73s!
 

Back
Top Bottom