Intent

[RussDill]

Well, I have two premises:-
(1) Something is having the experience of being 'me'.
(2) This experience is entirely abstract, comprised of intangible sensation, thought & emotion.

your first premise does not explain what is meant by "having the experience of being" nor does it explain me. Hardly far from complete, way to vague to be useful

Your second premise contains a bunch of useless words with vague definitions that change throughout your argumentment.

There's not a rational argument in existence which can refute either of those premises. Hence, I make no assumptions.

However, since they are so vague, you make all kinds of assumptions about their meaning throughout your argument.

The problem is that "the ether" exists at singularity.

You actually think "the ether" exists? hehehe, I'd like to see you defend that one. You are trying to user SR and GR to prove your philosophy, and yet, you say '"the ether" exists'. Reminds me in a way of "the earth is at the center. ..... .. yet it moves"