Info needed on Silverstein and his win/loss

Wow three claims, three strikes. If this was baseball Tweeter would be out. BTW, it's common knowledge that the moon is made of cheese and according to the famous British astronaut, Wallance, it is like no cheese he has ever tasted before.
 
I think yall better ask your members what source they have since they all came up with different numbers. Giving you proof is useless, you will just claim its false, so whats the point.
 
I think yall better ask your members what source they have since they all came up with different numbers. Giving you proof is useless, you will just claim its false, so whats the point.

Perhaps if you actually TRIED it and provided some evidence that anything you have said about Silverstein is true, you'd be surprised.

1. Where did you hear the buildings were half occupied?
2. Why after the 93 bombings would ANY rational person fault him for purchasing terrorist insurance?
3. Where did you hear the buildings needed significant repair?

I'm shocked! You aren't just parroting stuff you read on conspiracy sites are you? :eye-poppi
 
Last edited:
Yes, it was just a coincidence he recently bought them and upgraded the insurance for terrorist attacks. Also , it was common knowledge the buildings were half occupied, needing significant repair and outdated.
Lucky him, right?

Common knowledge that it was half occupied, huh? Looks like they forgot to tell PANYNJ. Oh, and the occupants themselves:

The Port Authority of NY & NJ said:
Date: February 12, 2001
Press Release Number: 16-2001

... As Real Estate Director, a position Mrs. Nanninga has held since 1996, the occupancy rate at the trade center has risen from 78 percent to a healthy 98 percent, retail soared in the trade center's mall, and available office space in the Newark Legal Center has nearly been filled.

Today, only about 250,000 of the 10.4 million square feet of office space in the trade center remains vacant. And the legal center has an occupancy rate of over 99 percent...
http://www.panynj.gov/AboutthePortAuthority/PressCenter/PressReleases/PressRelease/index.php?id=61

More info:

http://911myths.com/html/losing_money_at_the_wtc_.html
 
I think yall better ask your members what source they have since they all came up with different numbers. Giving you proof is useless, you will just claim its false, so whats the point.


So, you’re scurrying away from substantiating your vulgar little accusation. That’s somewhat ironic, given that you’re always telling me that the “truth is out there”.
 
Anyway, I'm currently discussing 911 on the swedish board flashback as well with user socialbidraget (I've allready posted three of his quotes as stundie nominations and there's more coming...) and he claims that Larry made 861 million dollars when looking at costs vs insurance etc. (he forgot to subtract loss of rental income but hey, what is seven years of lost rents?). Does anyone have a nice list of the numbers, I want compare it to the numbers he's given.



padragan,

As others have already mentioned above, the number $861 million is the exact figure of the insurance payout for WTC7 (which did not come close to covering the actual dollar value of the loss of that building). It may just be a coincidence, of course, that the person you are discussing this matter with on the other board came up with that number as an alleged "profit" for Silverstein Properties but perhaps you can provide us here with numbers this person is throwing around. It may be useful to see what he or she is actually claiming in order to provide specific, relevant and more complete answers to the question. So, if possible, can you elaborate on the person's claim and numbers?

As others have also mentioned above, we have previously had a couple of good threads here about the insurance coverage issues with regard to the WTC buildings that Mr. Silverstein leased (WTC 1, 2, 4, and 5) and/or owned (WTC7).

One particular point that I wish to make, though, is that Silverstein Properties cannot, as a matter of law, collect more than the value of its provable, insured losses. The $4.577 billion maximum payout that was adjudicated upon by the courts (with respect to WTC 1, 2, 4 and 5) is just that - a maximum. It does not mean that Silverstein automatically collects the maximum and then gets to dance off into the sunset with the cash. Silverstein Properties doesn't collect on the policies unless and until it proves that its loss is that much or more. After the litigation over the maximum was concluded (this was the one event vs. two events litigation that came about as a result of the differing language used in some of the 23-24 policies that covered the buildings), the insurers and the insured agreed upon a process by which the insured losses were to be determined, and it is only if and when the provable insured losses reach or exceed $4.577 billion that Silverstein Properties collects that amount.

That said, it seems apparent - to me, at least - that the provable insured losses far exceed that amount, so it is safe to say that the ultimate payout for WTC 1, 2, 4 and 5 will be $4.6 billion (if it hasn't already been paid out), and the maximum for WTC7 of $861 million was paid out quite some time ago.
 
Last edited:
Yes, it was just a coincidence he recently bought them and upgraded the insurance for terrorist attacks. Also , it was common knowledge the buildings were half occupied, needing significant repair and outdated.
Lucky him, right?


It is common knowledge that the towers were almost fully occupied when Silverstein took the lease and commanding some of the highest rates in Manhattan.

http://www.thecityreview.com/recomj99.html
New York's office market had a very strong year in 1998 with soaring rents and strong leasing activity reducing vacancies to lowest levels in recent years.
In Midtown, only 8.1 percent of the 194.5-million-square-foot inventory in 361 buildings was available at the end of the year, marking the first time in the 1990's that the availability rate "fell below the supply/demand equilibrium mark," according to a new report by Insignia/ESG, Inc. (In February, 1999, the same company readjusted these figures to indicate a 7.7 percent vacancy rate, the lowest in the 1990's, for 206.3-million-square-foot inventory in Midtown.)

Downtown's average asking rent rose 21 percent in 1998 to $31.75 a square foot a year with the World Trade Center/World Financial Center area having the highest asking rent of $39.06 a square foot.

February 12, 2001
http://www.panynj.gov/AboutthePortAuthority/PressCenter/PressReleases/PressRelease/index.php?id=61

Mrs. Nanninga's focused, businesslike approach to the intense discussions on the trade center net lease is typical of her management style. And the trade center lease has been the biggest challenge of her career, which began as a bilingual Spanish teacher in Boston in the early 1970s and culminated when she joined the Port Authority in 1976 and quickly rose through the ranks.

As Real Estate Director, a position Mrs. Nanninga has held since 1996, the occupancy rate at the trade center has risen from 78 percent to a healthy 98 percent, retail soared in the trade center's mall, and available office space in the Newark Legal Center has nearly been filled.

Today, only about 250,000 of the 10.4 million square feet of office space in the trade center remains vacant. And the legal center has an occupancy rate of over 99 percent
.


Dec 17 2000
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C01E7DA113FF934A25751C1A9669C8B63
Downtown, 630,000 square feet of space was leased during November, triple the level of activity in October. Much of the action was in the World Trade Center/World Financial Center submarket, where the vacancy rate was pushed down to 2.1 percent. Overall, the Financial District has 5.2 percent of its space available, a decline of more than half from a year ago. The average asking rent was $43.97 a square foot, a high for the area.


http://www.panynj.gov/pr/99-99.html
August 18, 1999

Occupancy at the World Trade Center has been running at nearly 94 percent -- the highest level of the decade -- and the opening of a number of highly popular, upscale retail stores has recently helped reposition the retail mall.

http://www.forbes.com/2001/02/23/0223topnews.html

The property is a cash cow for the Port Authority, as officials have estimated that the buildings earn a profit of $120 million annually. But New Jersey Gov. Christie Whitman and New York Gov. George Pataki decided several years ago that the authority, which has an annual budget in excess of $3.6 billion, should focus on transportation rather than real estate. Now, the agency will get an annual lease payment without having to worry about the real estate rental market.



….
 
Last edited:
You guys have only been debunking for 2 years. Its common knowledge. Look it up for yourself.

Why is a normal human being would make a statement and then back it up and have a conversation like a reasonable person would BUT truthers make their disgusting statements and then instead of backing it up they cop-out?

You seem to be implying that Silverstein is complicit to mass murder!
Those are heavy allegations to level on a person who has to live with the murder of his tenants.
Be a man and back up your statements and stand by them.
You are fast becoming a troll like your friend LastChild
 
Last edited:
Ok I feel dumb for asking this but if he didnt have terrorist coverage would that mean no money to rebuild?
 
Ok I feel dumb for asking this but if he didnt have terrorist coverage would that mean no money to rebuild?
depends, obviously they would file a claim and try to collect, but the insurance company might claim it as a case of force majeur or other circumstances and try to not pay, it would go to court and likely settle

it would mean less money, but i doubt it would mean no money
 
2. Why after the 93 bombings would ANY rational person fault him for purchasing terrorist insurance?

Except pre-9/11 you generally didn't usually have to specifically request insurance against terrorism in the US as it wasn't an exclusion on standard policies.

And it was also insured for terrorism in 1993, insurers paid out a tidy sum back then too.
 
And it was also insured for terrorism in 1993, insurers paid out a tidy sum back then too.

Aha! So the 93 bombing was an inside job too. That Silverstein is an evil GENIUS! ;)
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom