• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Inflation

Callous bastard talking about his recreational profiting without even working while people are struggling to feed their kids, amirite?

Nah, I give away a lot more than the piddly amounts I play with on shares.

If they are coffee drinkers then most definitely - especially if the price of coffee means the difference between having a cup of coffee or going without altogether.

I can make 100 cups of coffee from instant coffee packs at a cost of 6 cents for the coffee. Hot water, milf & sugar are extra.

They do not need to give up. They can stop drinking $8 cups of it. No hardship involved.
 
I can make 100 cups of coffee from instant coffee packs at a cost of 6 cents for the coffee.
Bite your tongue..That instant brown water is not coffee any more than baking soda is cocaine.
They do not need to give up. They can stop drinking $8 cups of it. No hardship involved.
Depends on whether the coffee is balancing your chemicals to make you bearable, or is an indulgent splurge.

I've never spent $8 on a coffee, and never would. Some things have a cap on their value, and exceeding it puts you in the sucker category.
 
You provide a vague "hey man, there was this weather in two countries" level of explanation, which does not even approach quantifying the outscale spike.

How does that explain Kona coffee price spiking, for example? Those beans are grown exclusively in Hawaii, not subject to any of the vague handwaving causes listed?
A detailed explanation is far too much work for this thread. If you really want to know then do your own research, but suffice to say that 'there was this weather in two countries' is not the nothing burger you imply. Bad weather can totally destroy crops leading to a massive supply shortfall.

Coffee demand is relatively inelastic because people are addicted to it. That means the price will vary wildly as supply changes, which is exactly what we see. To determine whether some other factor like 'they are jacking because they can' is involved you have to run the numbers. If normal market forces can't explain it you have an argument. I bet you won't though - you just do what everybody else does - assert that price gouging is the reason with no evidence. That might work in other forums, but not here.
 
Bite your tongue..That instant brown water is not coffee any more than baking soda is cocaine.

Them's fighting words! Instant coffee was invented in NZ.

Depends on whether the coffee is balancing your chemicals to make you bearable, or is an indulgent splurge.

That's kinda my point. If you need a fix, it's cheap. If you don't mind paying five bucks, I don't have a problem with that.

I've never spent $8 on a coffee, and never would. Some things have a cap on their value, and exceeding it puts you in the sucker category.

I've spent more than that, but not often. It's no better than a $4 cup from McCafe, but I'm not going to invite a CEO to flaming Maccas.
 
A detailed explanation is far too much work for this thread.
No, like virtually any issue of its kind, it can be summarized pretty easily. We are talking about massive changes, not trying to explain a 2% hike. Big broad brush explanations for huge changes are easy, just because of their sheer magnitude.

{Eta: watch how simple- Vietnam had a bit of weather for the last 6 years and the entire country is currently under 10 meters of water. Most people don't know that Vietnam supplies 75% of the world's coffee beans, so this created a massive global shortage, which made every other bean supplier producer say "well that had nothing to do with me, but imma jack my prices up now bitch, just because I can". By the way, there aint been no ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ coffee shortage, with mother ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ jonesing outside the shuttered up Starbucks. Demand is more thsn adequately being met}
If you really want to know then do your own research,
I brought up coffee because, as i said, it was one of the very few commodities that i recall the exact prices across years. The actual retailer wrote me, ss i said, explaining that it was nothing more than following global inflation trends. I have considered that claim, and determined that it is a lie. Retail pricing has not generally ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ tripled across the board.
but suffice to say that 'there was this weather in two countries' is not the nothing burger you imply. Bad weather can totally destroy crops leading to a massive supply shortfall.
It can. That does not make a vague handwave at the weather any more a robust explanation. Maybe the opening statement where it is then shown how it ends up being triple the cost, but standalone it's weak ass T.

{Eta: when someone says "yeah there was this weather, you know, so that explains it all. Good enough, yeah?", they are either not very sharp, or were predisposed to accepting any explanation right out of the gate. Which is also not particularly sharp, so... there's that. You have to actually keep connecting the dots to show how it ended up in ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ tripling, or you're just blowing smoke}
Coffee demand is relatively inelastic because people are addicted to it.
Or just like it as a relatively inexpensive luxury. I think that packs more punch than suggesting we are a planet of addicts in back alleys giving handjobs for a soy latte.
That means the price will vary wildly as supply changes, which is exactly what we see. To determine whether some other factor like 'they are jacking because they can' is involved you have to run the numbers. If normal market forces can't explain it you have an argument. I bet you won't though - you just do what everybody else does - assert that price gouging is the reason with no evidence. That might work in other forums, but not here.
Try that shoe on for size yourself- "bad weather over in 'Nam, dude" is a piss poor number crunchng, n'est-ce pas? Does that pack evidentiary soundness? Cuz it sounds pretty meaningless from here.
 
Last edited:
Them's fighting words! Instant coffee was invented in NZ.
That's because you are too nice to enslave entire foreign economies... er, I mean negotiate fair trade deals... in order to get The Spice.
That's kinda my point. If you need a fix, it's cheap. If you don't mind paying five bucks, I don't have a problem with that.
Yeah, I get that. My bitch is that I don't ask for much. No top shelf bourbon or anything, just some decent coffee to keep me focused at a bearable price. Spending $21US for less than a kilo takes the fun out of it, when I was just paying freaking $6US. The ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ weather wasn't that bad in ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ Vietnam.
I've spent more than that, but not often. It's no better than a $4 cup from McCafe, but I'm not going to invite a CEO to flaming Maccas.
I've admittedly become more of a coffee snob since discovering the gourmet ◊◊◊◊, and stuff from McD or DD is no longer palatable. I guess I just have to polish the monocle and pay the new normal. Just seems like we could... you know, deliver some Freedom somewhere and get this ◊◊◊◊ straightened out?
 
Nah, I give away a lot more than the piddly amounts I play with on shares.



I can make 100 cups of coffee from instant coffee packs at a cost of 6 cents for the coffee. Hot water, milf & sugar are extra.

They do not need to give up. They can stop drinking $8 cups of it. No hardship involved.
How Marie Antoinettish of you.
 
Luxury is a very relative and personal experience.

A famous coffee chain fancy cup can just be the affordable equivalent of a lobster dinner or weekend trip for others - an indulgence that makes it easier to get through the day, assuring yourself that you are still in the same Class as all the other, probably more successful people who also get their coffee there.

I only get coffee to go if I am driving long-distance and it's caffeine, not culinary experience I'm looking for
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom