luchog
Neo-Post-Retro-Revivalist
Yeah but you'd figure even looking at this 100% cynically and assuming they care about nothing but counting votes you'd still figure there would at least occasionally be scenarios, maybe not this one but sometimes, where cutting someone out would be the best way to get those votes.
Yeah, there are, that's why the supposedly liberal Dems turned their back on the LGBTQ community for so many years, and why the centrist wing of the party still does to varying degrees (eg. Bill Clinton's DoMA, and Hillary Clinton's cozying up to TERFs during the campaign).
Both parties are well aware that elections hinge mainly on Independent voters, who are predominantly white and predominantly irrational, emotionalist voters. Trump knew how to leverage this crowd, as did Sanders; but the former was supported by his party, while the latter was not.
That's also why so many "reform" candidates on the left end up being little better than their right-wing counterparts when they finally get into office (eg. Kamala Harris); and why even minority candidates project an image as close to mainstream cis-het white as they can (eg. Pete Buttigieg). They know that they can afford to alienate a sizeable fraction of minority voters (while the bulk of said minorities will still vote for any candidate that leans even slightly to the left), as long as they can keep the enough of the white independents on their side.
In the GOP's case, they know that a huge segment of their voter base are religious and racist nutters. They've been actively courting such people for decades; quietly and behind the scenes since Nixon, and loudly embracing them since Reagan. They've done reasonably well as a result, since such people are far more numerous in this country than many of us would like to admit. Ever since Trump brought them out from under their rocks, the GOP has been forced to acknowledge just how much they depend on these "deplorables" for their power base.
Last edited: