If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

BasqueArch said:
Fail as in break, shatter, smash, fragment, rupture, fracture.
Therefore the tower floors would also fail, break, shatter, smash, fragment, rupture, fracture at 12 foot fall from the weight above.
Quote:

FF: Do I need to explain all of the problems with this statement, or can you figure them out on your own if I give you enough time?
Click to expand...
BA:Yes, please explain.
Click to expand...

12 foot fall is greater than 5 foot fall.
Cole's experiment floors fail, break, shatter, smash, fragment, rupture, fracture at 5 foot fall from the weight above.

Therefore the tower floors 12 feet apart would also fail, break, shatter, smash, fragment, rupture, fracture at each 12 foot fall from the weight above, since a 12 foot fall has more kinetic energy than a 5 foot fall.

Cole proved the towers collapsed conventionally, not by CD.
__________________________________________
Hey what happened to you and your big words?
 
BasqueArch said:
12 foot fall is greater than 5 foot fall.
Cole's experiment floors fail, break, shatter, smash, fragment, rupture, fracture at 5 foot fall from the weight above.

Therefore the tower floors 12 feet apart would also fail, break, shatter, smash, fragment, rupture, fracture at each 12 foot fall from the weight above, since a 12 foot fall has more kinetic energy than a 5 foot fall.

Cole proved the towers collapsed conventionally, not by CD.
__________________________________________
Hey what happened to you and your big words?
Click to expand...

Now Now, you know Cole's connections were several magnitudes stronger against the force of the descending mass, than the towers welds and bolts would have been.
What Cole actually proved is he is an incompetent Idiot, that shouldn't even be allowed to play with Lego's, or Lincoln logs, heaven forbid, he plays a game of Jinga he will use it as proof the towers should have toppled.
 
FalseFlag said:
Still thinking...

Still thinking...

Still thinking...
Click to expand...


The participle you used is obviously incorrect, as you've repeatedly demonstrated that it is beyond your capabilities.


The bit you selectively omitted:

"You clog this forum with garbage, and I'm sick of reading your drivel. Can we have the good site back again?"

So, through your incessant trolling, you wish to spoil what others used to enjoy. I'm becoming sick of ISF, and that is because of your moronic posts and constant baiting.

This was once a site where one could learn, now you've screwed it up with your vapid musings. Congratulations, troll, you've succeeded in chasing me away. I hope you're pleased with yourself.
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
Wait, she? Did I miss something?
Click to expand...

She claims to be a he... that is good. My four daughters can do physics.

It would be outstanding if no one quoted the troll.

14 years, and FF can't see Cole is a fraud on 9/11 issues. FF has no evidence, no clue Cole is wrong.
 
FalseFlag said:
If the NIST reports on 9/11 are garbage, then why would ASCE be immune? They might be credible for non-9/11 related discussions, but how would I know if they are a credible 9/11 resource unless you post the entire paper?
Click to expand...

LMFAO.

After all the clueless fiascos that you've been thru, you actually have the huevos to claim that YOUR clueless, ignorant ass is capable of determining the credibility of structural engineers' papers on structural engineering??????

That is hilarious.
 
tfk said:
LMFAO.

After all the clueless fiascos that you've been thru, you actually have the huevos to claim that YOUR clueless, ignorant ass is capable of determining the credibility of structural engineers' papers on structural engineering??????

That is hilarious.
Click to expand...

S/he won't pay $30 for access to a peer reviewed article on an experiment that goes to the heart of a subject that s/he spends many hours every week pretending to care about. The reality is that s/he is "voting with her feet" and letting you and everyone else know that she doesn't actually value learning about the subject; rather, s/he just values her own time so little that s/he is willing to invest it purely to troll those who do care about understanding the subject. It's sad on a couple levels, but there it is. No need to feed the troll.
 
Last edited:
benthamitemetric said:
S/he won't pay $30 for access to a peer reviewed article on an experiment that goes to the heart of a subject that s/he spends many hours every week pretending to care about. The reality is that s/he is "voting with her feet" and letting you and everyone else know that she doesn't actually value learning about the subject; rather, s/he just values her own time so little that s/he is willing to invest it purely to troll those who do care about understanding the subject. It's sad on a couple levels, but there it is. No need to feed the troll.
Click to expand...

If s/he has paid for ANY book, magazine, or newspaper in His/her life, then his/her argument fails. If one has interest in a subject and feels passionately about it then one would be willing to outlay a rather nominal amount of money for articles written by experts in the field.

Curious, wonder if FF has ever donated to AE911T.
 
jaydeehess said:
If s/he has paid for ANY book, magazine, or newspaper in His/her life, then his/her argument fails. If one has interest in a subject and feels passionately about it then one would be willing to outlay a rather nominal amount of money for articles written by experts in the field.

Curious, wonder if FF has ever donated to AE911T.
Click to expand...

Really... who cares... what is apparent is that ff is a waste of time and contributes nothing but annoyance!
 
tfk said:
you actually have the huevos to claim that YOUR clueless, ignorant ass is capable of determining the credibility of structural engineers' papers on structural engineering??????
Click to expand...
I'm not a structural engineer, and I would never claim that I have the expertise to question a credible paper on the subject.

The issue is that the claims being made by the so-called experts here are so flawed that anyone can see through them.
 
jaydeehess said:
If s/he has paid for ANY book, magazine, or newspaper in His/her life, then his/her argument fails. If one has interest in a subject and feels passionately about it then one would be willing to outlay a rather nominal amount of money for articles written by experts in the field.
Click to expand...
My budget for fiction is used up for the month.

Curious, wonder if FF has ever donated to AE911T.
Click to expand...
Yes, I have.

Let me beat everyone to the punch.

No, my budget for fiction was not used up that month. No, I don't consider AE911T fiction, but I know what's coming.
 
FalseFlag said:
My budget for fiction is used up for the month.


Yes, I have.

Let me beat everyone to the punch.

No, my budget for fiction was not used up that month. No, I don't consider AE911T fiction, but I know what's coming.
Click to expand...

Next time that bottom dwelling cretin goes on a junket, at least get a hat or plastic table mat out of it.
 
HotRodDeluxe said:
So, through your incessant trolling, you wish to spoil what others used to enjoy. I'm becoming sick of ISF, and that is because of your moronic posts and constant baiting.
Click to expand...

When did the truth become moronic?

Do you really enjoy reading all of the lies about how 3000 people were murdered?

This was once a site where one could learn.
Click to expand...
Learn what?

The sky is NOT purple. Open your eyes and see for yourself!
 
NoahFence said:
Next time that bottom dwelling cretin goes on a junket, at least get a hat or plastic table mat out of it.
Click to expand...
What about something like this?

Untitledpn_4508802_22518295.png
 
FalseFlag said:
I'm not a structural engineer, and I would never claim that I have the expertise to question a credible paper on the subject.

The issue is that the claims being made by the so-called experts here are so flawed that anyone can see through them.
Click to expand...

And yet you never show why you think they're flawed, presumably because you don't actually have the capability or knowledge to evaluate the "claims", even basic stuff like the difference between average and constant acceleration one ra period of time.

Or, more briefly...

Proof?
 
FalseFlag said:
My budget for fiction is used up for the month.


Yes, I have.

Let me beat everyone to the punch.

No, my budget for fiction was not used up that month. No, I don't consider AE911T fiction, but I know what's coming.
Click to expand...

What aspect of the article in question is fiction to your mind?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom