If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

skyeagle409 said:
That would be a bit difficult considering that you are not in a position to help someone who is more knowledgeable and experienced than you.
Click to expand...
What? I never said exactly what I would do to help. Are you saying I can't help you find a therapist or shrink? I can help you use Google.
 
skyeagle409 said:
The proof is that after 15 years, there is not a shred of evidence that supports CD explosives at ground zero or a government 9/11 false flag operation, not to mention David Chandler, Steven Jones, Richard Gage, Judy Wood, VA Today, Loose Change, Pilots for 911 Truth, and others who have been debunked with evidence and the laws of physics.
Click to expand...
Proof? Without proof your words are meaningless.
 
benthamitemetric said:
The only thing standing between you and the entire article is your willingness to pay for the entire article. Whether or not you choose to pay for the article has no bearing on the value of the article or the underlying experiment or my "burden of proof" in respect thereof or in respect of anything else (again, not sure what you think I am trying to prove, anyway).
Click to expand...
I don't read or pay for the National Enquirer or the Weekly World News. If I don't read or pay for that garbage, why would I pay to read the garbage you linked?
 
abaddon said:
No use pretending that you have not seen the posts.
Click to expand...
I have seen lots of posts made by skeptics. What I have not seen are many credible, factual posts made by skeptics. There is a difference.

Once again, it is your claim that you understand none of this because you are not an expert and do not understand physics.
Click to expand...
What don't I understand? Do you think you can "learn me good", just like the others that have tried? Please try. I would love to see what you think I don't understand about basic physics.
 
FalseFlag said:
Why would I do this? It would not make me an expert. Of course, that would not matter, anyway. You disagree with anyone who challenges your delusions and fantasy.
Click to expand...

Well, it wouldn't make you an expert but it wiuld give you some education in the field. You might find it interesting plus it's free.
 
FalseFlag said:
I don't read or pay for the National Enquirer or the Weekly World News. If I don't read or pay for that garbage, why would I pay to read the garbage you linked?
Click to expand...

Is this a claim that you consider a Paper in a respected, Peer Reviewed Engineering Journal to be equivalent to a Tabloid Newspaper?

OK. I think we are getting to the root of the problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom