If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

MicahJava said:
As always, you are referring to commercial explosive devices designed to blow through solid steel and concrete. It's not really the holy grail argument against CD.
Click to expand...

So you asserted that since the cutter charges used in the Aladdin demolition weren't picked up by a seismograph that day one's supposedly used on 9/11 wouldn't have been detected either, but now you're claiming it wasn't explosives used after all but something else?????

If explosives weren't used, why are you so fascinated with the Ashley Banfield video then? You do know thermite doesn't make that type of sound don't you?
 
ProBonoShill said:
So you asserted that since the cutter charges used in the Aladdin demolition weren't picked up by a seismograph that day one's supposedly used on 9/11 wouldn't have been detected either, but now you're claiming it wasn't explosives used after all but something else?????

If explosives weren't used, why are you so fascinated with the Ashley Banfield video then? You do know thermite doesn't make that type of sound don't you?
Click to expand...

It's a feature of a serial liar. Can't keep the stories straight.

Remind me again how many versions say it was terrorists, aircraft and fire?
Oh, just the one.

See, it's easy to keep the story straight if it's the truth.
 
FalseFlag said:
Please post this video.
Click to expand...


I'm going to start a thread in the future with the times of all captured explosions laid out. I'll post it then.

If you want to make a little bit more of an ass of yourself and claim they don't exist I'll post them now.
 
NoahFence said:
Anyone who doesn't use the word "massive" or a synonym of it to describe them is either suffering from a head injury or didn't get enough oxygen at birth.

That's science!
Click to expand...

The only evidence for anything other than a few pockets of fire on a few floors are firefighter's witness accounts, many of which erroneously described the smoke sticking to the south face as "all 47 floors engulfed in fire".
 
MicahJava said:
The only evidence for anything other than a few pockets of fire on a few floors are firefighter's witness accounts, many of which erroneously described the smoke sticking to the south face as "all 47 floors engulfed in fire".
Click to expand...

How do you know those reports are erroneous?

You're making crap up. Try dealing with reality for a few moments.

These people were right in front of it. Were you?
 
MicahJava said:
The only evidence for anything ...
Click to expand...

There is no evidence in 9/11 truth, evidence is forbidden.

Where do you guys get silent explosives from?

You never said if these witnesses support your CD theory of woo?
"Sounded like bombs" –Keith Murphy
"A huge explosion" –Gerard Gorman
"Sound of popping and exploding" –Alwish Monchery
"Explosions" –William Burns
"Kept hearing these large boom, boom" –Rosario Terranova
"Sounded like explosions." –Anthony Fitzgerald
"Like a shotgun going off" –Mark Meier
"Sounded like explosions" –Wilfred Barriere
"Sounded like bombs, like blockbusters" –John Murray
"You could hear explosions" –Richard Smiouskas
"Sounded like an M-80, that's how loud they were" –Tim Pearson
"Sounds like a shotgun" –Eric Ronningen
"Sounded like an explosion" –John Morabito
"There were lots of explosions" –Jeff Birnbaum
"Under the assumption that the sounds were secondary bombs." –Andrew Rodriguez
"Sounded like bombs. Like a bomb going off. I mean, it was huge." –FDNY Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
Click to expand...

Why is 9/11 truth evidence free.
 
MicahJava said:
The only evidence for anything other than a few pockets of fire on a few floors are firefighter's witness accounts, many of which erroneously described the smoke sticking to the south face as "all 47 floors engulfed in fire".
Click to expand...

I'll put my faith in the FDNY over some internet troll all day, everyday.

Besides all one has to do is perform a simple google search to prove you're a massive liar.

https://www.google.ca/search?q=wtc+...ved=0ahUKEwjT3YDo0-fMAhVJmBoKHRwUB68Q_AUIBigB
 
beachnut said:
There is no evidence in 9/11 truth, evidence is forbidden.

Where do you guys get silent explosives from?

You never said if these witnesses support your CD theory of woo?


Why is 9/11 truth evidence free.
Click to expand...

I've heard this one before, those quotes are describing human bodies hitting the ground!

Oh wait, that's not funny at all.
 
MicahJava said:
I've heard this one before, those quotes are describing human bodies hitting the ground!

Oh wait, that's not funny at all.
Click to expand...

You posted lies from nuts in 9/11 truth about sounds of explosions, trying to say they were proof of explosives; are you a liar, or was the paper you posted reference to a lie you are exposing.

Not funny at all, yet you spread lies about 9/11, mocking the murder of thousands with. And you do this mocking without evidence.

You post paper by idiots filled with failed logic. And you don't explain the paper, as you Gish Gallop on to the next failed point.
Not funny at all; why do you lie about 9/11?

MicahJava said:

Collapse or Explosion? A Discussion of the WTC “Sounds of Explosions” Issue by Adam Taylor ...
Click to expand...
You post lies from one of the dumbest anti-intellectual in 9/11 truth. You and he share the lack of logic, lack of knowledge, and complete ignorance of physics, chemistry, and science in general.

no evidence movement based on the ignorance of its members = 9/11 truth

This is the best you can do for the memory of thousands killed on 9/11, speculate and spread lies.
 
Last edited:
NoahFence said:
?
You just did.
Stop lying.
Click to expand...

You are the liar or can't read. I just said that there's no evidence for floors fully engulfed in intense fires besides what firefighters say. The reports that the entire building was engulfed in fire or "all 47 floors" on fire seems to actually be describing smoke, not actual flames. Also, unlike other historic large fires like One Meridian Plaze, the fire could not have spread floor-to-floor.

The prediction by the engineer before 1:00 PM was made when the heavy fires had only been burning for less than an hour.
 
Last edited:
MicahJava said:
You are the liar or can't read. I just said that there's no evidence for floors fully engulfed in intense fires besides what firefighters say. The reports that the entire building was engulfed in fire or "all 47 floors" on fire seems to actually be describing smoke, not actual flames. Also, unlike other historic large fires like One Meridian Plaze, the fire could not have spread floor-to-floor.

The prediction by the engineer before 1:00 PM was made when the heavy fires had only been burning for less than an hour.
Click to expand...

Which only prove that was knowledgeable, experienced, and good at his job.

Or he was complicit in the mass murder of thousands.
Which is it?
 
MicahJava said:
You are the liar or can't read. I just said that there's no evidence for floors fully engulfed in intense fires besides what firefighters say. The reports that the entire building was engulfed in fire or "all 47 floors" on fire seems to actually be describing smoke, not actual flames. Also, unlike other historic large fires like One Meridian Plaze, the fire could not have spread floor-to-floor.

The prediction by the engineer before 1:00 PM was made when the heavy fires had only been burning for less than an hour.
Click to expand...

Did they use One Meridian Plaza after the fire?

Why do you lie about 9/11? 19 terrorists did 9/11, they would be laughing at your inability to figure out what they did, all by themselves.

One Meridian Plaza... lol, the firemen pulled back, they feared collapse... read the report next time...

oops fire does damage steel.

onemeridiansag.jpg

Go ahead compare it to the WTC, and we see steel fails in fire... darn, you are self debunking.

If 9/11 was at night, the whole small fire, cold fire, little fires BS would be gone. Why does 9/11 truth cling to fantasy dumbed down for those who can't think for themselves?

The fires in the WTC towers were more heat energy than 2,700 tons of thermite... is thermite your fantasy, another lie is fueling your speculation based on BS?
 
Last edited:
NoahFence said:
Which only prove that was knowledgeable, experienced, and good at his job.
Click to expand...

And you have no explanation as to how such precise foresight of a historical first is possible. Seriously, a skyscraper is on fire for an hour and some anonymous guy predicts it's collapse five hours after? That doesn't sound weird to you? You will either meet me with a half-answer or try to justify one historical first with another.


Or he was complicit in the mass murder of thousands.
Which is it?
Click to expand...

It is definitely a possibility that he was complicit in mass murder.
 
MicahJava said:
And you have no explanation as to how such precise foresight of a historical first is possible. Seriously, a skyscraper is on fire for an hour and some anonymous guy predicts it's collapse five hours after? That doesn't sound weird to you? You will either meet me with a half-answer or try to justify one historical first with another.




It is definitely a possibility that he was complicit in mass murder.
Click to expand...

Do tell, how was he complicit in mass murder?

This should be good.
 
ProBonoShill said:
So you asserted that since the cutter charges used in the Aladdin demolition weren't picked up by a seismograph that day one's supposedly used on 9/11 wouldn't have been detected either, but now you're claiming it wasn't explosives used after all but something else?????

If explosives weren't used, why are you so fascinated with the Ashley Banfield video then? You do know thermite doesn't make that type of sound don't you?
Click to expand...

Still waiting for an answer, that new investigation isn't going to happen by itself.

Do better.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom