If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

[MicahJava]

What does that gibberish have to do with what I wrote?????

Please focus and answer the questions.

Try one at a time if it helps.

Do you think explosives were used to bring down the buildings?

How many pounds of explosives would it take to bring down WTC 1?

How many pounds of explosives would it take to bring down WTC 2?

How many pounds of explosives would it take to bring down WTC 7?

Show the math please. Once you calculate the amount of explosives required, tell us if they would register on a Seismic Recording device.

You do know readings were taken that day don't you?

http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/WTC_LDEO_KIM.pdf

Why can't you produce a video with the successive loud bands of a CD when hundreds exist?

What do you think was responsible for the explosion Ashley Banfield heard? Do you think that mirrors a controlled demolition in any way?

I mean if you can't answer these simple questions, how do expect anyone to support a new investigation?

The lurkers are watching and waiting for you to impress them. Show them what you got!

I simply wouldn't know how to calculate how loud an explosive device would be if it was designed to knock off columns and girders by their welds/joints/bolts, nor how much explosives it would take. Why not ask somebody else?

 

[ProBonoShill]

I said before, typical cutter charges would not have been used to demolish the three buildings.

Enlighten us, what do you think was used then?

 

[MicahJava]

Enlighten us, what do you think was used then?

Maybe that OEM engineer used his psychic powers to wish 8 stories away.

 

[FalseFlag]

Yep. The third that had massive fires raging unchecked after suffering irreparable damage.

Massive? Your understanding of that word is disappointing. I hope I am not the only person you have disappointed after using that word.

 

[ProBonoShill]

I simply wouldn't know how to calculate how loud an explosive device would be if it was designed to knock off columns and girders by their welds/joints/bolts, nor how much explosives it would take. Why not ask somebody else?

Okay, so now we know you have no idea the amount of explosives it would take to bring down the buildings and what amount would show up on a seismograph. I suggest performing a search in this sub-forum, the answers are available, providing you want to stop being lazy and learn.

What about the other questions?

You missed a few:

Why can't you produce a video with the successive loud bands of a CD when hundreds exist?

What do you think was responsible for the explosion Ashley Banfield heard? Do you think that mirrors a controlled demolition in any way?

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

I simply wouldn't know how to calculate how loud an explosive device would be if it was designed to knock off columns and girders by their welds/joints/bolts, nor how much explosives it would take. Why not ask somebody else?

It would be loud, why not just over toque the bolts?

 

[FalseFlag]

You failed the physics tests badly

Please provide evidence to support your claim.

 

[Axxman300]

I said before, typical cutter charges would not have been used to demolish the three buildings.

Yes, actually, they would be necessary. They would have been loud too.

 

[ProBonoShill]

Maybe that OEM engineer used his psychic powers to wish 8 stories away.

Why do you have such trouble answering simple questions?

If you can't communicate clearly, how do you expect to get a new investigation?

 

[FalseFlag]

Yes, actually, they would be necessary. They would have been loud too.

I'm sure they were. That's why Ashley Banfield's mic picked them up. That's also why they were edited out of the NIST videos.

 

[waypastvne]

"If the strategically placed charges had been detonated below ground, they would have delivered about the same amount of energy as a magnitude-1.1 earthquake, a small blip on a seismograph probably not strong enough to be felt by people.

But with the charges positioned above ground instead of within the crust -- where the release of strain results in powerful earthquakes -- the Aladdin implosion didn't even register on the nearby seismograph at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, according to geology professor Dave Weide."

https://web.archive.org/web/2012100..._home/1999/Apr-11-Sun-1999/news/10963838.html

No, It appears that all the explosions caught on video were also recorded in the seismic record.



In this video for instance :




The shadows in the video coincide with the time of 11:01:07 in the seismograph recording.

The position of the sun is approximately here in the video.

The angle of the sun at 11:01:07 is 137.96 deg. which matches the video.

This same explosion was was captured on three other videos and all explosions captured appear to coincide with the times 11:01:07 11:15:04 and 11:29:46.

The source of the explosions is most likely a gas leak originating from here:

The 11:29:46 explosion can defiantly be confirmed as a gas explosion because the people are running up the street yelling 'gas leak, gas leak" before the explosion occurs in two separate videos.

Now, would you like to show us where your pre collapse WTC 7 explosion was recorded in the seismic record ?

 

[ProBonoShill]

Please provide evidence to support your claim.

Here and here.

You're welcome!

 

[FalseFlag]

Why can't you produce a video with the successive loud bands of a CD when hundreds exist?

Please post links to the hundreds of videos of the collapse of WTC7 that you claim exist. If you actually find one where the explosions can clearly be heard, I promise the FBI will be knocking on your door soon.

 

[FalseFlag]

Here and here.

You're welcome!

I will say "thank you" when you actually complete the task.

 

[MicahJava]

Okay, so now we know you have no idea the amount of explosives it would take to bring down the buildings and what amount would show up on a seismograph. I suggest performing a search in this sub-forum, the answers are available, providing you want to stop being lazy and learn.

What about the other questions?

You missed a few:

Why can't you produce a video with the successive loud bands of a CD when hundreds exist?

What do you think was responsible for the explosion Ashley Banfield heard? Do you think that mirrors a controlled demolition in any way?

As always, you are referring to commercial explosive devices designed to blow through solid steel and concrete. It's not really the holy grail argument against CD.

 

[FalseFlag]

No, It appears that all the explosions caught on video were also recorded in the seismic record.

LOL. It amazes me how far skeptics will go to try to debunk a fact.

 

[FalseFlag]

The 11:29:46 explosion can defiantly be confirmed as a gas explosion because the people are running up the street yelling 'gas leak, gas leak" before the explosion occurs in two separate videos.

Please post this video.

 

[ProBonoShill]

I'm sure they were. That's why Ashley Banfield's mic picked them up. That's also why they were edited out of the NIST videos.

There are hundreds of videos available, you were asked before to provide one with the extremely loud, successive bangs associated with a CD. You dodged that request like a champ, care to try again?

Remember the lurkers are watching.

 

[FalseFlag]

There are hundreds of videos available, you were asked before to provide one with the extremely loud, successive bangs associated with a CD. You dodged that request like a champ, care to try again?

Remember the lurkers are watching.

Why waste my time?

 

[NoahFence]

Massive? Your understanding of that word is disappointing. I hope I am not the only person you have disappointed after using that word.

Anyone who doesn't use the word "massive" or a synonym of it to describe them is either suffering from a head injury or didn't get enough oxygen at birth.

That's science!