If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

Why not look one up all of your lonesome? Is your google busted?
No, it's not busted. The problem is that I have installed a BS filter addon in my browser, so bringing up most of the sites skeptics link to just shows a blank page.

The addon has a "just for lulz" feature where you can whitelist sites, which is why I can still come here.
 
No, it's not busted. The problem is that I have installed a BS filter addon in my browser, so bringing up most of the sites skeptics link to just shows a blank page.

The addon has a "just for lulz" feature where you can whitelist sites, which is why I can still come here.

Funny, it seemingly has had little effect on your posts - check the polarity, you must have installed it 180 degrees out.
 
Nope, his game is.

Which is why he's trying to distance himself from it now.

This is funny, but not LOL funny. I am not distancing myself from my "game". I have simply realized that it is utterly absurd to take skeptics seriously.
 
When someone defends Cole with the null set, it exposes their overwhelming ignorance and zero knowledge of physics.
 
When someone defends Cole with the null set
The only set I know about is the 24-piece set.

ac6edb9609cf6c0cb3652c5ea3074cd8.jpg
 
[much snipping]

What was the KEY component of the towers that Cole needed to model?

Was it:

  1. the floors?
  2. the columns?
  3. the connections?
Here's a hint: What was the PRIMARY component that failed?

You should really, really consider #3 carefully.

Did Cole make any attempt whatsoever to accurately model (read "scale") the connections?

Hell, no.

Why didn't he do this?
Because Cole is incompetent.
Just like his model.

[much snipping]

You could have boiled it down to just this! :D
 
I found a glitch. Whatever you posted appears to be blank, and it shouldn't happen on this site. Could you kindly post something with a little more validity? I haven't LOL'd today.

Took you more than one try to work that one out?

No worries, you're more of a manufacturer than an end user.
 
Originally Posted by NoahFence
I note that junior posts very infrequently after this schooling.


Schooling?

Wait for it...

You know the rest.

That would be where I demonstrated that you hadn't even read NCSTAR 1-9. Like it or not kiddo, you'll have to read it if you hope to make your case with either the professional world or with John Q. Public. Unless your whole schtick is simply an exercise in public masturbation.
 
Unless your whole schtick is simply an exercise in public masturbation.

I have started doing the same things a skeptic would do. I have started posting nonsense. The difference is that my nonsense is not meant to be taken seriously.
 
Perfection is often achieved after multiple attempts.

Filter went TU in one post?

If you're ever lucky enough to bump into perfection, send up a flare.

And FTR, perfection is another state more often found in fiction than in the real world - much in common with grand conspiracy in that sense.
 

Back
Top Bottom