If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

FalseFlag said:
If you could post an experiment to prove Cole wrong you would.
Click to expand...

Wrong about what? You have claimed the Cole video somehow models the WTC Tower collapses, but you have never provided any linkage between the video and the actual event (other than the direction -- down -- but that is trivial).

So, other that this vacuous claim Cole models the collapse, what is there to consider?
 
jsfisher said:
You have claimed the Cole video somehow models the WTC Tower collapses, but you have never provided any linkage between the video and the actual event (other than the direction -- down -- but that is trivial).

So, other that this vacuous claim Cole models the collapse, what is there to consider?
Click to expand...
I posted a link to a video. Cole makes the claims; I don't. I asked anyone to perform an experiment showing Cole was wrong. So far that has not happened.
 
FalseFlag said:
Sure they would have. /sarcasm

You know, because the media outlets are free, completely open, and completely independent from any corporations or other outside control. The media always tells us everything we need to know, and everything they tell us is true and 100 percent accurate.

*facepalm*
Click to expand...
I see we can add politics to the list of things you are clueless on.
 
FalseFlag said:
I posted a link to a video. Cole makes the claims; I don't. I asked anyone to perform an experiment showing Cole was wrong. So far that has not happened.
Click to expand...

Cole’s wood, cement boards and paper experiments are a failure. They failed to prove that a 20 pound weight and firecrackers brought down the Twin Towers.
 
BasqueArch said:
Cole’s wood, cement boards and paper experiments are a failure. They failed to prove that a 20 pound weight and firecrackers brought down the Twin Towers.
Click to expand...
That's OK because Cole wasn't trying to prove that a 20 pound weight and firecrackers caused two 110 story buildings to collapse. Do you know what he was demonstrating? If not, why are you so sure he is wrong?
 
FalseFlag said:
That's OK because Cole wasn't trying to prove that a 20 pound weight and firecrackers caused two 110 story buildings to collapse. Do you know what he was demonstrating? If not, why are you so sure he is wrong?
Click to expand...

Go ahead. What was he demonstrating. What was he trying to prove.
 
FalseFlag said:
That's OK because Cole wasn't trying to prove that a 20 pound weight and firecrackers caused two 110 story buildings to collapse. Do you know what he was demonstrating? If not, why are you so sure he is wrong?
Click to expand...
I know what he was doing. Selling "truth" to the rubes.

Is it working?
 
BasqueArch said:
I would like to hear from you his answers to my questions. If you can't explain it, you don't understand it.
Click to expand...
How about this? You explain it to me to make sure I understand. Better yet, why don't you make a video performing the same experiments so you can explain it to me better.
 
FalseFlag said:
I posted a link to a video. Cole makes the claims; I don't. I asked anyone to perform an experiment showing Cole was wrong. So far that has not happened.
Click to expand...

Nobody cares. You do realize all you're doing here is providing free entertainment for us and of course the lurkers. We'd like to thank you for that.

I tried explaining this to you awhile back yet like the others things you've been taught here you've failed to grasp it.
It's not our duty to do your work for you, that's your job. You need to convince the masses of this evil government conspiracy and so far your performance has been laughable and pathetic.

Someone posted a link showing these days more people believe in Bigfoot than 9/11 truther dolts. That's hilarious!

I'd tell you to do better, but I know you can't.

Hope Dick sends you some postcards from his next vacation, you helped pay for it after all.
 
FalseFlag said:
How about this? You explain it to me to make sure I understand. Better yet, why don't you make a video performing the same experiments so you can explain it to me better.
Click to expand...

It wouldn't do any good. It would be a waste of my time. You don't know physics. And both you and Cole don't know structural mechanics.
It is clear you don't understand and can't explain what it is his experiments are supposed to prove.


"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool." - Richard Feynman.
 
Last edited:
FalseFlag said:
I posted a link to a video. Cole makes the claims; I don't. I asked anyone to perform an experiment showing Cole was wrong. So far that has not happened.
Click to expand...

You presume Cole is right. That would be your claim.

But, just like your claim about constant acceleration, since you are unwilling or unable to support it, your claim is dismissed.
 
FalseFlag said:
Post a link to these experiments. Why is this so hard? Post a link.

I already explained why I won't answer your posts, or anyone else's. I'm not playing your games. I will not admit defeat, because I am not defeated. I just know it's stupid to keep wasting time playing your games.
Click to expand...

I gave you the conditions for me posting links to those experiments.
Posting links isn't hard at all.

Meet them. Or don't. It's entirely up to you.

But your refusal reveals the FACT that it is more important to you that you hide the simple truth of your (lack of) knowledge on these issues than it is for you to learn simple, engineering facts about 9/11.

This is exactly what I expected you to do. Reveal that you're not really interested in learning anything of substance. That you're only interested in perverse argumentation.

And to reveal that telling the simple truth about your background is too high a hurdle for you to get over.

Thanks for playing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom