If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

NoahFence said:
It's little wonder there is a correlation between the conspiracy driven mindset and terrorism.

One feeds poison to the mind, and the other acts on it.
Click to expand...

clap.gif
clap.gif


Noah you do have moments of pithy brilliance.
 
Argumemnon said:
I see you're now back with the "huh, I never read that" tactic.

Good show, sir.
Click to expand...

MikeG said:
Thirty pages of misconceptions later, and you're still asking........ This used to be funny.
Click to expand...


FalseFlag said:
What "misconceptions" do I have? Please post one of them, and then post a link to a credible source that proves I am wrong.
Click to expand...

You still did not post one of the alleged misconceptions. I will give you a second chance.
 
Last edited:
NoahFence said:
It's little wonder there is a correlation between the conspiracy driven mindset and terrorism.

One feeds poison to the mind, and the other acts on it.
Click to expand...

Please explain how a conspiracy driven mindset caused a building to collapse at freefall. Please explain how a conspiracy driven mindset paid for the hookers and drugs used by 19 "devout" Islamic terrorist hijackers.

I really want to know this. I want to know how a conspiracy driven mindset can pay bills. I'm tired of going to work.
 
jaydeehess said:
You have a short term memory deficit? You have continually been shown your misconceptions wrt Newtonian physics. You wish to enumerate them. Look at every post of yours in which you use the word "Newton" and then examine the responses. Your misconceptions are noted in those responses.
Click to expand...
Please post one misconception you claim I have. Then, please post a link to a credible source that proves your claim.

Third chance.
 
FalseFlag said:
Please explain how a conspiracy driven mindset caused a building to collapse at freefall.
Click to expand...

Terrorists have a conspiracy driven mindset.
They hijack planes because of some imagined grand conspiracy against them.
They fly planes into the buildings.
Buildings fall.

Try to keep up.
 
FalseFlag said:
Please post one misconception you claim I have. Then, please post a link to a credible source that proves your claim.

Third chance.
Click to expand...


Would you like to revise your example of Newtons first law or would you like to stick with it ? That way we can see if you still have misconceptions.


Challenge 1a.

Prove the following example is wrong.

Example: A object rests on the surface of the earth. The object is in a vacuum. Since the object is at rest, there is no motion. There is a downward force acting on the object, which is exerted by gravity. Since the object is at rest, there is an opposite force acting on the object in the opposite direction. This force is called the normal force. Since the object is in a vacuum, there is no force exerted by air. The only forces acting on the object are the force due to gravity and the normal force. The forces are balanced, so the net force is zero. As long as the net force is zero, the object will stay at rest.

Once again, prove any part of my example is wrong. Simply saying that I'm wrong doesn't count. You must clearly prove I'm wrong, with an example citing your sources and reasoning.
Click to expand...
 
waypastvne said:
Would you like to revise your example of Newtons first law or would you like to stick with it ? That way we can see if you still have misconceptions.
Click to expand...

+1 for actually following directions.

I have already corrected the issues to make everyone here happy. My example is not wrong, it just isn't as correct as you nitpickers want. Simplicity is your enemy, so you must over-complicate everything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom