Cole's video stands on its own.
If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II
- Thread starter Seymour Butz
- Start date
Cole's video stands on its own.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
...........and alone it will stand for eternity.
waypastvne
Muse
- Joined
- May 25, 2009
- Messages
- 539
Quick poll: did anyone else see it?
Yes. I saw your post and it was exactly the proof FF was asking for.
Yes. I saw your post and it was exactly the proof FF was asking for.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
Because it would have been a waste of resources and outside their task.
You keep going back to this notion that the NIST reports were for laymen.
I already agreed they were not for laymen. I also think that the experiment issue goes back to the original purpose for this thread. If you go back to the scientific method, you perform experiments to prove that your observations are correct. I know you hate me saying this, but if it does not agree with experiment it's wrong. I think experiments would not have been a waste of money. Experiments would have confirmed or failed to confirm their hypotheses.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
You asked why the NIST did not do more modeling.
Why would the NIST doing more modeling not be a waste of money after they identified the most probable cause for initiation. What would be gained in respect to their task?
Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through
Ah, the old "I may have mis-spoken" pseudo-admission. You have steadfastly maintained over several pages that a falling body must experience a deceleration when it strikes any obstacle, however flimsy, and attacked, insulted and even threatened anyone who disagreed with you, and now that you've realised what an idiot you've been making of yourself you have the nerve to claim that you were actually right but used the wrong word here and there. And further down the thread I see that, even though you now admit that your understanding of the dynamics of a falling body was completely wrong, you still insist that Cole's video, which makes precisely the same error, is irrefutable. And you think that this somehow constitutes admitting when you're wrong.
Do you now want to follow through on your threat of exposing me as a fraud, now that you've admitted I was right and you were wrong all along? Or do you think, maybe, you owe me an apology?
Dave
Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through
Says the person who has just admitted that his understanding of physics was completely wrong.
Dave
Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through
rwguinn
Penultimate Amazing
Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through
Amazing. You're pretending that the fact you won't listen to anyone but yourself is somehow a good thing.
Dave
rwguinn
Penultimate Amazing
Still looking for some math, guys
dv/dt=acceleration, d(mv)/dt=Force
m of a falling body don't change. without delta-v, there ain't no force...
dv/dt=acceleration, d(mv)/dt=Force
m of a falling body don't change. without delta-v, there ain't no force...
Thanks.
FalseFlag, time for you to do the work that you keep demanding others to do when they ask about a post of yours. You don't want to appear like having double standards, do you?
NoahFence
Banned
The "official story" is invented by you people.
The rest of us refer to it as reality. Judging by your complete inability to produce anything that counters it, I guess you agree with reality and you're just playing games and disrespecting those lives lost that day.
Nice.
NoahFence
Banned
You know damn well what I'm talking about. You're too much an intellectual coward to answer it.
This entire charade that you people put on is based on your laughable notion that aircraft impacts + fire could not cause those buildings to collapse.
Yet you people have never put forth a coherent alternative that takes into account the entire day's events. Not one of you. It's been almost 15 years!!
NoahFence
Banned
Actually I just watched it, and .29 seconds in I'm already done. Using the Tacoma Narrows bridge collapse, and saying that in all structures that collapse, we do a "detailed study as to it's cause".
1) We already knew the cause of the building collapses on 9/11.
2) Even still, it was stundied.
(sic?)
Yes, somtimes you do admit your errors and yet you still hold firmly to the belief 9/11 was an inside job perpetrated by the US government.
Animal
Master Poster
It stands right up there with the other moronic videos using snowbanks, video cassettes, cardboard boxes, etc as a comparable to the towers construction.
