If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

FalseFlag said:
Flight 93 does not explain freefall in building 7.
Click to expand...

Not this again. Haven't any of you truthers learned anything in 15 years?

FalseFlag said:
I have read lots in this thread. Have you?

I understand lots of what is being said in this thread. Do you?
Click to expand...

If you understand so much, why do you fail to understand Cole's mistakes and yours? Why do you pretend not to have read posts that answer your questions? Why do you treat people who know more than you like ignorants? Why do you fail to answer questions and challenges?
 
FalseFlag said:
If it existed you would post it just to prove that it does exist, and I am wrong. You would never pass up the chance to prove I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
pgimeno said:
You're wrong all the time (your words). No need to prove that again in this case. The video is still there.

Quick poll: did anyone else see it? (just yes or no, please don't post the link, don't do FalseFlag's job, since he keeps demanding that from others it's just fair that he does it in this case).
Click to expand...

waypastvne said:
Quick poll: did anyone else see it?


Yes. I saw your post and it was exactly the proof FF was asking for.
Click to expand...
It exists. You're wrong. You've demanded others to search for your own messages when they asked you for proof of having said something. You refuse to do the same when you ask me for proof of having said something and I tell you to search for my own message.

Showing your double standards to readers satisfies me more than proving you wrong, which I've alrady made in numerous occasions, and also now thanks to waypastvne.
 
abaddon said:
OK. What credible source proves Cole valid?
Click to expand...

Cole is an engineer. If he clearly explains what he is trying to demonstrate, then I believe he is credible.

If you want to attack his credibility, then post a video that shows an experiment that proves he is wrong.

I'm still waiting.
 
FalseFlag said:
Will the directions of net forces be similar? Yes. Will the accelerations be similar? Yes. Will the direction of net force be similar? Yes.

Drop any object you want on any other object you want. The above will be true.
Click to expand...
These three conditions are just as equally met in the pizza stand experiment as in the firecrackers experiment. Even better in the former, because the firecrackers experiment shows upwards movement that neither the WTC nor the pizza stand experiment showed.

That keeps being true, no matter if you keep forgetting about it.
 
Oystein said:
Be my guest and do the complaining:

What, specifically, does not scale right in this model? And why is that relevant? What is it relevant for? :)
Click to expand...
You know why scale is relevant, and what is dependent on scale and what is not dependent on scale.

Similar accelerations, similar directions of net forces, and similar sequences of net forces are not dependent on scale.

I'm not going to bother discussing scale in your video. My point was to show that skeptics are discussing it, either. Why is that? Is it because scale is not an issue, or is it because they like the conclusion so they ignore the obvious?
 
FalseFlag said:
Cole is an engineer. If he clearly explains what he is trying to demonstrate, then I believe he is credible.

If you want to attack his credibility, then post a video that shows an experiment that proves he is wrong.

I'm still waiting.
Click to expand...


We know the reason you're a "truther".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom