Merged if flight 93 was shot down, why would the event be be covered up?

[dvictr]

i am a 911 truther, new to this forum. i believe that 4 planes were hijacked by terrorists.

the title of this thread is misleading, i'm playing devils advocate by explaining that the gov would NEVER, admit to shooting down a civilian airliner. Even more so on the 911 in the emotional environment. it would have been a "PR nightmare" and emotionally wreck the families of the people on board.. my guess is that it was part of the larger plan to unite nation for war, and the ensuing psychological propaganda.

Todd Beamer was made into a hero, could you imagine telling his family "lets roll" was BS?

look at the video below from 2:00, odd that they spend an unusually long time discussing "what if, you had to shoot down a plane".. it appears the pilots are getting their 15 minutes of fame and end up letting out their conscious.

the link below is to the CBS interview on 60minutes with the Pilots, i cant post links

youtube.com/watch?v=OB8JE-54Xqc

 

[TJM]

Flight 93 wasn't shot down. What's your point?

 

[Athyrio]

i am a 911 truther, new to this forum.

Obviously.

 

[triforcharity]

i am a 911 truther, new to this forum.

the title of this thread is misleading, i'm playing devils advocate by explaining that the gov would NEVER, admit to shooting down a civilian airliner. Even more so on the 911 in the emotional environment. it would have been a "PR nightmare" and emotionally wreck the families of the people on board.. my guess is that it was part of the larger plan to unite nation for war, and the ensuing psychological propaganda.

Todd Beamer was made into a hero, could you imagine telling his family "lets roll" was *********?

look at the video below from 2:00, odd that they spend an unusually long time discussing "what if, you had to shoot down a plane".. it appears the pilots are getting their 15 minutes of fame and end up letting out their conscious.

the link below is to the CBS interview on 60minutes with the Pilots, i cant post links

youtube.com/watch?v=OB8JE-54Xqc

Yeah, because the murder of ~2900 people in NYC was not enough......

Stupid Truthers......

 

[dvictr]

Flight 93 wasn't shot down. What's your point?

listen to yourself.. you want to pretend like youre a rational person..

SO on 9/11 you have the 2 towers, and the pentagon burning... "Ohh BTW there is this rogue flight 93 over PA"... the pilots went in there and did their jobs.. i dont blame them at all.

you think they were going there to escort the plane? they shot it down and made Todd Beamer and the other passengers into heros... honorable and credible but not the truth.

 

[TJM]

listen to yourself.. you want to pretend like youre a rational person..

SO on 9/11 you have the 2 towers, and the pentagon burning... "Ohh BTW there is this rogue flight 93 over PA"... the pilots went in there and did their jobs.. i dont blame them at all.

you think they were going there to escort the plane? they shot it down and made Todd Beamer and the other passengers into heros... honorable and credible but not the truth.

If that's your point, I'm afraid you'll have to do better than that.

 

[Greediguts]

they shot it down and made Todd Beamer and the other passengers into heros... honorable and credible but not the truth.

Do you have any evidence for this claim? How have you gone about researching flight 93?

 

[dvictr]

If that's your point, I'm afraid you'll have to do better than that.

what if i told you i believe 100% the "official" story in 911 commission report, plus the minor detail that the plane was shot down before reaching the Capital/WH and THEN crashed .

doesn't change much, very plausible.. gives the gov face/ and makes the victims into heroes thats it.

 

[TJM]

what if i told you i believe 100% the "official" story in 911 commission report, plus the minor detail that the plane was shot down before reaching the Capital/WH and THEN crashed .

doesn't change much, very plausible.. gives the gov face/ and makes the victims into heros thats it.

What if I told you I have a purple dragon in my garage? It still doesn't make a case for purple dragons existing.

Here ya go dvictr:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/tags.php?tag=flight+93

That's about how many times we've been down this road before. All things UAL 93 can be found here and then some. Read up and then see if you still want to play "devil's advocate" with us.

PS - Most of us here don't believe in the devil.

 

[dvictr]

Do you have any evidence for this claim? How have you gone about researching flight 93?

Its very rational/logical..

-a plane is about to attack Washinghton DC, 3 have already been hijacked and used as missiles>>>> OBVIOUSLY it needs to be shot down.

in addition to the above scenario.. my evidence is the anomalies at the crash site such as the debris field, noted "seismic time discrepancy", and my training in psychology and public relations.

 

[TJM]

in addition to the above scenario.. my evidence is the anomalies at the crash site such as the debris field, noted "seismic time discrepancy", and my training in psychology and public relations.

it was a great decision to make the passengers into heros

Do tell. Start with the word I've bolded.

 

[Greediguts]

Its very rational/logical..

-a plane is about to attack Washinghton DC, 3 have already been hijacked and used as missiles>>>> OBVIOUSLY it needs to be shot down.

in addition to the above scenario.. my evidence is the anomalies at the crash site such as the debris field, noted "seismic time discrepancy", and my training in psychology and public relations.

So some details please....

At what altitude do you think the plane was hit? How much damage did the missile cause? When you looked at the crash site what exactly made it seem to you that the plane was shot down?

 

[Quad4_72]

Its very rational/logical..

-a plane is about to attack Washinghton DC, 3 have already been hijacked and used as missiles>>>> OBVIOUSLY it needs to be shot down.

in addition to the above scenario.. my evidence is the anomalies at the crash site such as the debris field, noted "seismic time discrepancy", and my training in psychology and public relations.

None of this is evidence, ESPECIALLY not the bolded portion You are going to have to be much more concise. For example, what about the debris field? Do you have pictures, data, calculations for why it should have been different? And what specifically about a "seismic time discrepancy"? Please do elaborate.

 

[WhisperingEye]

How about your training in spelling ... it's "heroes"

 

[dvictr]

None of this is evidence, ESPECIALLY not the bolded portion You are going to have to be much more concise. For example, what about the debris field? Do you have pictures, data, calculations for why it should have been different? And what specifically about a "seismic time discrepancy"? Please do elaborate.

10:06 or 10:03 time of crash??.. regardless

let me rephrase this.. WHAT EVIDENCE DO YOU HAVE.. that the plane was NOT shot down?

the interview with the pilots is enough for me..

youtube.com/watch?v=OB8JE-54Xqc

 

[TexasJack]

let me rephrase this.. WHAT EVIDENCE DO YOU HAVE.. that the plane was NOT shot down?

Yes! The classic truther fallacy, proving a negative. How about you prove that it was. It's your claim, bring the evidence.

 

[Quad4_72]

10:06 or 10:03 time of crash??.. regardless

let me rephrase this.. WHAT EVIDENCE DO YOU HAVE.. that the plane was NOT shot down?

the interview with the pilots is enough for me..

youtube.com/watch?v=OB8JE-54Xqc

Absolutely hilarious. You really can't make this stuff up. When asked for evidence for his claims, he realizes he is making stuff up and tries to turn it around. I really did laugh out loud though when I read that post.

What specifically in that video is evidence that UA93 was shot down? I watched the whole thing and didn't see any evidence.

 

[dvictr]

Yes! The classic truther fallacy, proving a negative. How about you prove that it was. It's your claim, bring the evidence.

i would like to know how many other truthers can be grouped as accepting "100% of the 911 commission report" but that flight 93 was shot down/ disabled AND THEN crashed..

the passenger hero story came out days later, nothing special had to be set up or manipulated.

 

[TJM]

It's "hero".

Thank you for editing.

 

[Quad4_72]

i would like to know how many other truthers can be grouped as accepting "100% of the 911 commission report" but that flight 93 was shot down/ disabled AND THEN crashed..

the passenger heroes story came out days later

You are making claims and not providing proof. This is a forum of skeptics. Please provide proof for your claims. Also, what psychology and public relations training do you have? How does that apply towards your belief that a missile shot down flight 93? More specifically, what theories are you talking about in psychology and how do they apply to your missile theory?