Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fossils
But wait, hang on, he also definitely took ravens too
Genesis 8:
"7 Then he sent out a raven, which kept going to and fro until the waters had dried up from the earth.
8 He also sent out from himself a dove, to see if the waters had receded from the face of the ground."
So he only needed one type of dogs and horses, but at least two types of bird...
Internal logic collapse imminent...
Plus, I hate to keep bringing this up but who used the bone and stone tools?
Were these people pre or post Noah?
So is Nick saying that you wouldn't need to take all the birds, just one type of bird (doves presumably) and the currernt 10,000 types of bird all evolved from them?Mojo said:Now that you put it like that, yes it seems a little unlikely. Maybe they took a rottweiler and a chihuahua to get a bit of genetic variety. And maybe a little step-ladder for the chihuahua.
But they are nevertheless of the same species. Nick has claimed that not all species were taken on the ark, and that all current species somehow arose from the "kinds" that were taken. I am eagerly looking foreward to his explanation of how new species could have arisen without evolution having taken place.
As long as it isn't the "God dunnit" get-out, of course.
But wait, hang on, he also definitely took ravens too
Genesis 8:
"7 Then he sent out a raven, which kept going to and fro until the waters had dried up from the earth.
8 He also sent out from himself a dove, to see if the waters had receded from the face of the ground."
So he only needed one type of dogs and horses, but at least two types of bird...
Internal logic collapse imminent...
Plus, I hate to keep bringing this up but who used the bone and stone tools?
Were these people pre or post Noah?