ID/Creationism - How fast were extinctions?

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fossils

Mojo said:
Now that you put it like that, yes it seems a little unlikely. Maybe they took a rottweiler and a chihuahua to get a bit of genetic variety. And maybe a little step-ladder for the chihuahua.

But they are nevertheless of the same species. Nick has claimed that not all species were taken on the ark, and that all current species somehow arose from the "kinds" that were taken. I am eagerly looking foreward to his explanation of how new species could have arisen without evolution having taken place.

As long as it isn't the "God dunnit" get-out, of course.
So is Nick saying that you wouldn't need to take all the birds, just one type of bird (doves presumably) and the currernt 10,000 types of bird all evolved from them?
But wait, hang on, he also definitely took ravens too

Genesis 8:
"7 Then he sent out a raven, which kept going to and fro until the waters had dried up from the earth.
8 He also sent out from himself a dove, to see if the waters had receded from the face of the ground."

So he only needed one type of dogs and horses, but at least two types of bird...
Internal logic collapse imminent...


Plus, I hate to keep bringing this up but who used the bone and stone tools?
Were these people pre or post Noah?
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fossils

Ashles said:
So is Nick saying that you wouldn't need to take all the birds, just one type of bird (doves presumably) and the currernt 10,000 types of bird all evolved from them?
It all depends on how he defines the word "kind." I suspect it would mean more than one pair of birds, but we'll have to wait for him to get back to us on that, I guess. He certainly seems to be implying that there were just 2 of the dog "kind."

So, Nick, in your statement
He took them on the ark as the bible says he took two of every kind. Not 2 of every dog, or every horse, but kind. You have a picture of taking every species, but this is not the case.
What exactly do you mean?

What is a "kind?" You imply that it's not the same as a species but something broader, perhaps more like a genus.

How many "kinds" were taken? Was there just, say, one "kind" of cat which gave rise to everything from the domestic cat to lions and tigers? How could a variety of different species develop from a single "kind" without evolution taking place?

By the way, dogs aren't a good example to use as despite their wide range of sizes and builds domestic dogs are in fact all of the same species.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fossils

Mojo said:
It all depends on how he defines the word "kind." I suspect it would mean more than one pair of birds, but we'll have to wait for him to get back to us on that, I guess. He certainly seems to be implying that there were just 2 of the dog "kind."
Good point. So maybe 'kind' does equate to 'species'.
As there are definitely at least 2 'types' of bird we must assume Noah collected all 10,000 species and took them with him.

Info on bird species
He must have spent a lot of time in South America.
 
There was plenty of room on the Ark because there really aren't a lot of kinds of animals. There are only creeping, crawling, and flying kinds. So, taking 2 of each, Noah took 1 raven and 1 dove, 1 snake and 1 worm, and 1 velociraptor and 1 hyena. He would have taken a triceratops, but saddles were not yet invented.
 
Well, if the deluge was caused by some sort of rain, how would you explain the survival of salt water fishes in the flood? And if salt waters rose, how freshwater fish species survived? Noah had tanks in the ark?

So, most dinosaurs died in the flood because they were not good swimmers, eh? The worst swimmers drowned first, right? OK. Then, why Ichtiostega and similar amphibian fossil species, clearly nice swimmers, do not appear later in the fossil records? They should be better swimmers than dinosaurs as Stegosaurus for example... And why the aquatic reptiles Mesosaurus do not appear after the fossil dinosaurs, since they were quite good swimmers? Why the fossil whales Basilosaurus were extincted and faded away from fossil record before mammoths and modern horses showed up?? Why there are fossils of humans, saber-toothed cats and mammoths at the same strata, above strata with all those dead extinct aquatic animals? Mammoths and saber-toothed cats can swim better than whales, amphibians and ammonites?

Why all those marine animals like trilobites, amonites, and countless genus and species of fishes, arthropods, mollusks, the Ediacara fauna, the weird Burgess shale fauna were extincted by the flood? They drowned? Noah did not had enough tanks at the ark?

Besides, geologists can, based on several evidence (sedimentary structures, grain size distribution, mineral composition, clast shape) tell the depositional environment of a sedimentary rock. We can tell if that mud was deposited at the bottom of a lake, a lagoon, a shallow sea, a deep sea, a river bank, a mudslide, etc. And guess what? There is no evidence for a the types of deposit a global flood would cause. Fossils are found in a variety of sedimentary environments. There is no "global flood layer" with the distribution you describe. If someone told you this, then this person is at best, ignorant when it comes to geology.

Why there are no "pre-flood" sedimentary layers, where we could find fossils of dinosaurs, trilobites, mammoths, zebras, leopards, australopitecines, humans, pelicosaurs, labirynthodonts, pterosaurs, saber-toothed cats, lions, giraffes, plesiosaurs, basilosaurus, etc. all living toghether at the same time in peace and harmony?

And why pterosaurs did not survived the flood? Noah forgot them?
 
Nick Harman said:

If a flood has killed millions of things why are their remains not all found in the same geological layer?
Answer: Put water and dirt in a jar, shake it up and watch it work, you will not see 1 layer.
--------------------

The whole silly flood thing.
Where did the water come from?
Answer: Genesis 7:11 (NKJV)
In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep were broken up (inside the earth), and the windows of heaven were opened. (from above, i.e. canopy or intense global rain brought on by volcanic activity, opinions vary)

Where did the water go?
answer: you see it all over the earth: Psalm 104 refers to the mountains rising and the valleys sinking.

How could rain and fountains shake up the many thousands of cubic miles of fossil containing sediments into worldwide mixed up mud? How could angular unconformities form in mud settling out of shook up water?
Answer: The world does not work that way. The evidence disproves Nick's assertion.
Hypothesis: Nick will not provide a less flakey response.
 
Nick Harman said:
Ossai said:
Nick HarmanStarlight: We can observe stars that are far more than 6000 LY away. How can their light reach us?
Answer: I would have to assume that light was "arrived" when God created it. This is certainly logical thinking if the bible is true.
Oh wow - I've only just read that bit.
That's amazing. So any evidence that disagrees with Creationism was rigged by God intentionally?

Then why bother trying to defend creationism scientifically at all?

Why not just say God created 6,000 years ago a world and a universe that appears in all measurable ways to be billions of years old.

But then He writes the Bible that says it isn't.

Seems a bit odd no?
 
Nick Harman said:
At some point we will stop discussing what I believe and we will start talking about what you believe.

Just to get it out of the way:

I believe that Nick is wrong.
I believe that much of Nick's material comes from
answersingeneisis.com and similar creationist websites.
I believe that evidence and data and logic and careful observation and documentation and peer review are trivial and meaningles to Nick.

Now back to 'What Nick Believes'.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fossils

Plus, I hate to keep bringing this up but who used the bone and stone tools?
Were these people pre or post Noah? [/B][/QUOTE]
Answer: Do we not have tribes of people today that would fit this prehistoric mold you are referring to? I have seen some folks who do not have internet on the discovery channel.
 
fishbob said:
Just to get it out of the way:

I believe that Nick is wrong.
I believe that much of Nick's material comes from
answersingeneisis.com and similar creationist websites.
I believe that evidence and data and logic and careful observation and documentation and peer review are trivial and meaningles to Nick.

fishbob, is all your material original? Are your writing ground breaking science papers. Of course it is from reading other peoples research. I am not a scientist.

Now back to 'What Nick Believes'.
 
fishbob said:
How could rain and fountains shake up the many thousands of cubic miles of fossil containing sediments into worldwide mixed up mud? How could angular unconformities form in mud settling out of shook up water?

Answer: are you implying that all layers are angular unconformities? I have read the contrary, that more are smoothe transitions and that if the layers were over periods of time we would see more erosion in the layers. I.E. Grand Canyon.

QUOTE]
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fossils

Nick Harman said:
Plus, I hate to keep bringing this up but who used the bone and stone tools?
Were these people pre or post Noah?
Answer: Do we not have tribes of people today that would fit this prehistoric mold you are referring to? I have seen some folks who do not have internet on the discovery channel.
So post-Noah then?

So ancestors of Noah's chose to turn their back on his knowledge and start from scratch? They discarded the tools and knowledge used to build the largest floating vssel in history and voluntarily went back to hunting with jaw bones and rocks?

Odd, that's not mentioned in the Bible.
 
Ashles
From one original pair? That degree of genetic variety from one breeding pair in 6,000 years?
You’re still giving the YEC too much credit. Remember that Noah was an old when building the ark. And we’re talking biblical old as in hundreds of years, not to mention the generations that came before him. If I were in a masochistic mood I’d look up the exact age and then go reference the YEC timeline, but I’m not. They usually claim the flood took place roughly 4000 years ago.


Nick Harman
Answer: Both. Most of the bible literally. It is historical as indicated by archaeolgical records and findings. Secular writings confirm the kings talked about in the bible, etc.
While I agree that some of the Kings and other famous people as well as some countries and cities mentioned in the bible do have multiple sources, they by no means confirms the bible’s authenticity. It’s kind of like saying that all of Tom Clancy’s books are real because they mention real places.

A reading in Genesis is obviously to be taken literal, it is a historical account.
So the world is flat.

Ask a secular Hebrew scholar if the creation days are conveyed as literal days or periods of time and he will tell you days. So the question is truth, not figurative or literal.
I did, after getting a strange look on his face he proceeded to try and explain some of the symbolism contained within the Torah and why it shouldn’t be taken literally.

The whole silly flood thing.
Where did the water come from?
Answer: Genesis 7:11 (NKJV)
In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep were broken up (inside the earth), and the windows of heaven were opened. (from above, i.e. canopy or intense global rain brought on by volcanic activity, opinions vary)
Work the math for this one, seriously. If you’re unable to do so then I’ll point you to a site that has done so already. Take the circumference of the earth and determine total land area. Once you’ve got that calculate the volume of water necessary to cover every mountain to a depth of at least 20 feet.
What is that volume of water and where did it come from and where is it now. The amount of water currently on earth is a paltry sum in comparison.

Actually it’s
Genesis 7
The waters rose and covered the mountains to a depth of more than twenty feet.

This doesn’t even mention the problem of how did they breathe?

Where did the water go?
answer: you see it all over the earth: Psalm 104 refers to the mountains rising and the valleys sinking.
Where did all the water go? Where is it now? Sorry but your answer is meaningless in light of the evidence (water) we have available now. But the bible specifically references mountains that were used to land upon. The same mountains that were there before the flood started.

How many animals did Noah take on the ark?
How did they all fit on there?
How big was the ark?
answer: I addressed this to ashles, refer to that post.
No you didn’t. You made some vague ascertains and never actually addressed any of the questions.

Work the math for the buoyancy of the ark with and without the animals.
answer: I do not know, but the ark only needed to be a gigantic floating device not a craft built to go somewhere. Certainly not diminishing this as a simple task, but do not imagine him having to build a vessel like we see today.

Now work the math allowing only the building materials available at that time.
answer: Wood my friend, the earth was very different before the flood, bible refers to the land being gathered together. Plenty of trees. Pitch I assume as a sealant, and I have no problem believing they had the means, (hardware) to fasten together. I mentioned before we find artifacts that by evolutionary time scales should not be found.

Serious question, are you incapable of doing the math? Even grouping animals by kinds (you still haven’t answered that little question either), the space available is woefully inadequate.
Go here for a brief look at the flood story.

Go here for a list of things you’ve yet to be ask.

Parasites. How did parasites, many of which cause life-threatening diseases exist while only Adam and Eve were on Earth? Did they have all those parasites?
Answer: Death is the penalty of sin, so until Adam sinned, there was no death and disease in the world per the bible.
Didn’t the flood supposedly happen AFTER the fall? Attempt to answer the question instead of avoiding it.

Starlight: We can observe stars that are far more than 6000 LY away. How can their light reach us?
Answer: I would have to assume that light was "arrived" when God created it. This is certainly logical thinking if the bible is true.
Unsupported premise.

Or think about it this way, god deliberately lied to you by having light that appears to have been generated 10,000 years ago visible to us now.

Ossai
 
Posted by Nick Harman
I do not need a non believer to tell me what the bible says, I realize the bible says more than that, just did't take the time. Later today I will directly quote it to you and it will not change my answer, you are straining gnats.
Gee, he’s already proven his ignorance and he’s starting to get snippy. How long before he starts [size=large]large ALL CAPS AND IN COLOR ? [/size]
 
Ossai said:
Posted by Nick Harman

Gee, he’s already proven his ignorance and he’s starting to get snippy. How long before he starts [size=large]large ALL CAPS AND IN COLOR ? [/size]
Which is why I think we all need to make an effort to remain polite with Nick.

He is at least returning and trying to answer our questions (and we are bombarding him quite heavily).

It can't be easy for Nick as he is answering all these quesions with the inedequate explanations provided by answersingenesis.com ( and similar sources of 'information') which is, of course, only leading to yet further questions.

I'm sure Nick will remain polite with us if we do with him.

Nick, please understand we are not trying to get at you or criticise your beliefs. We are merely trying to explain that genesis, and YE creationism, does not hold up scientifically. The evidence against it is everywhere. Anyone who tells you otherwise is giving you incorrect information.

But I hope you don't mind us continuing to ask you questions as we will happily continue to answer any qurestions you have for us.
 
More of the thoughts of Stephen Jay Gould on intermediate forms:

"If you had given me a blank piece of paper and a blank check, I could not have drawn you a theoretical intermediate any better or more convincing than Ambulocetus. Those dogmatists who by verbal trickery can make white black, and black white, will never be convinced of anything, but Ambulocetus is the very animal that they proclaimed impossible in theory." --- Stephen Jay Gould, Natural History magazine, May 1994.
 
Nick Harman said:
Answer: are you implying that all layers are angular unconformities? I have read the contrary, that more are smoothe transitions and that if the layers were over periods of time we would see more erosion in the layers. I.E. Grand Canyon.


YEC people should try to get better geologists to their rows...

The (top and bottom, in the case) boundary of a sedimentary layer are defined by changes in the depositional environment. Most layer interfaces are actually blanks in the geological records, formed at periods of non-deposition and/or erosion.

Angular uncorfomities are a special case of break in the record, usually implying a great time span. The area where the layer underneath the erosional surface was deposited has must have been uplifted, tilted and eroded, then it must undergo subsidence again, so the layers above the uncorformity will be deposited (and an eventual new uplift if the discordance is being watched in outcrop).

Note that many contacts (typical examples- eolic sandstone over mudstone deposited in a tidal flat; turbiditic sandstone layer over shales deposited at the mouth of a submarine canyon) will imply a time span without deposition. And the sum of incremental small ammounts of time will easilly be over 6ky... Actually the very "small ammount of time" my be over 6Ky.
 

Back
Top Bottom