• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Split Thread ICE arrests mayor

The mayor was not attempting to enter the facility to engage in Congressional oversight.


Mayors have ultimate authority over compliance with building and occupancy requirements in their city.
They have no authority to actually engage in building inspection. This is a absurd argument you are making.

Not sure why you persist with it.
 
Its not a strawman if you think the chief executive of the City of Newark has the authority to perform inspections.
You're just restating the straw man. I explained in detail the kind of oversight the mayor could do in his capacity as the chief executive officer of the city. Your stubborn insistence on cramming a different argument in my mouth doesn't address that.
 
You're just restating the straw man. I explained in detail the kind of oversight the mayor could do in his capacity as the chief executive officer of the city. ..
You said the chief executive has the authority to do inspections and that is why the mayor was there.
 
Ive been informed by @JayUtah that there is video evidence of ICE allowing in the group, knowing who is with them including the mayor. Id love to see this video.
I'd love to see video of the Mayor somehow breaching the gates and trespassing. Until so, I'll believe he is innocent until proven guilty.
 
I'd love to see video of the Mayor somehow breaching the gates and trespassing. Until so, I'll believe he is innocent until proven guilty.
No need to breach the gates to engage in trespassing.

ICE discovered that the mayor was with the group, he has no authority to engage in Congressional oversight, they asked him to leave, he refused, then complied after a final warning.

ICE decided to arrest anyway. Its their discretion to do so.
 
No need to breach the gates to engage in trespassing.
Asked and answered. If the officer opens the gate to allow a party to enter the perimeter, they are invitees and not trespassers. This is elementary occupancy law.

ICE discovered that the mayor was with the group, he has no authority to engage in Congressional oversight, they asked him to leave, he refused, then complied after a final warning.
If a license to remain is revoked, it cannot transform the prior presence into a trespass. The mayor was specifically told he was being arrested on suspicion of trespassing based on his prior presence inside the perimeter.

ICE decided to arrest anyway. Its their discretion to do so.
ICE arrested the mayor on public property, not at their discretion but at the direction of political DHS leadership.
 
No need to breach the gates to engage in trespassing.

ICE discovered that the mayor was with the group, he has no authority to engage in Congressional oversight, they asked him to leave, he refused, then complied after a final warning.

ICE decided to arrest anyway. Its their discretion to do so.
Really? How is it trespassing if a person is not actually on the premesis?
 
Asked and answered. If the officer opens the gate to allow a party to enter the perimeter, they are invitees and not trespassers. This is elementary occupancy law.


If a license to remain is revoked, it cannot transform the prior presence into a trespass. The mayor was specifically told he was being arrested on suspicion of trespassing based on his prior presence inside the perimeter.


ICE arrested the mayor on public property, not at their discretion but at the direction of political DHS leadership.
And the Mayor of Newark, running for Governor, is NOT political?

Huh.

:rolleyes:
 
Really? How is it trespassing if a person is not actually on the premesis?
He passed through the gates, putting him on ICE property. It appears one ICE person let him in, perhaps by mistake. Did the Mayor announce who he actually was? Did the person let him in by error?
 

Back
Top Bottom