I own a gun!

but im shocked, i didnt know we are such "high" ranked in murder with fire arms......

i never tryed to get a weapon, but i thought we have hard restrictions.

You bring up an important point that most anti-gun nuts don't seem to comprehend.

Criminals have guns. If laws STOPPED people from commiting crimes, there would be no criminals

In most places, shooting someone to take their stuff is already a crime. A criminal who will happily break the law against shooting you for fun is pretty unlikely to be concerned about a law making a gun illegal.
 
Oh that must be why there aren't weight classes in combat sports. After all, a little imagination is all it takes to best a bigger person. :rolleyes:

No, it takes proper instruction and a clear head. That isn't to say that I could take out any person twice my size under any circumstances, but understanding the most common circumstances behind criminal attacks goes a long way toward understanding how to deal with them.

And yes: I do live my life completely sure of that type of thinking. It's one of the reasons I don't own a gun myself-- I can't think of any situations in my own life where it would be needed under any common circumstances. Others feel differently, and I respect that, but that doesn't mean I have to agree with their point of view.
 
what do you think about this one?

It seems this might have been another school rampage shooter in the making. But because his little game of assembling guns in his home was illegal, he was stopped. I wonder how far this would have got if what he was doing was perfectly legal and normal?

I think you are reading too much into the story, unless you know something else about the guy that was not in the article you linked to. The man already legally owned a rifle with a silencer, but did not use it for anything illegal.

It seems he is just another person in trouble for for the harmless activity of gun ownership.

Ranb
 
Actually, in most cases I can show a 90 pound woman how to handle a situation with a 200 pound attacker, yes. Lack of imagination isn't an excuse.

And this is why I advise women to never take a 'women's' self defense class; stuff like this actually gets believed.

The only true defense there without a weapon is to run. Yes, you might have to make some mai before you can effectively run and that is where tactics like the foot stomp, eye gouge, and balls kick can come in handy. However, that doesn't mean that the 90 pound woman is 'safe' and the overconfidence that comes from training only with other women is dangerous.

Every time I've trained with women they have been seriously surprised that their defensive tactics didn't work. I'm a big guy, and all of the stagger moves do just that, if anything. The real surprise comes when these women are shown that not only does stomping on my foot and elbowing me in the forehead only stop me for a split second, but I can outrun them as well. I'm not even exceptional.

Make distant, get help. Otherwise, no, you're not going to 'win' in a fight against a much stronger opponent.

I've never been in a match with a woman who posed much of a threat to me, and that includes the blackbelts. Even the 150lbs women get physically dominated. I'm sure there are women out there who could easily kick my ass, but that doesn't mean women can learn a few 'moves' and be 'safe'.

On a side note, the 'a man kicked in the balls is defenseless' is one of the biggest myths out there. Not only is it not very easy to hit there in the first place, but a lot of men just get very pissed off from the pain.


EDIT: I should add that this really doesn't have much to do with guns, but that women's self defense has more to do with cell phones and being aware than with moves, guns, or mace. Just don't think you can take on someone a lot bigger than you.
 
Last edited:
It's the gun enthusiasm as such, the fascination with the object, and the desire to own it and have it in the home, that I don't see here.

Compare it to something else. Scuba diving. I have an aluminum tank filled with 3000 psi of air strapped to my back. I use it to dive down as deep as 120 feet into a ship wreck. It is an awesome feeling knowing that the adventure you are on has risks, but you are trained to deal with those risks and have fun at the same time. You only protection is your gloves wetsuit and training; and maybe a knife if you how to use it.

Now go to the rifle range. I have a rifle and silencer I custom built; with ammo I loaded myself specifically for that rifle. How well it works depends on how well I built the whole package. The feeling of satisfaction is rewarding; not as nice as scuba diving, but worthwhile none the less.

Ranb
 
Really? What are some other purposes of a firearm?


NOT running cable through a wall.

doh.gif
 
This is true, but leaves out the highly popular practice of those who also modify certain legal weapons to illegal specs.

What illegal specs are you referring to? I'm assuming that you live in the USA, and are not in prison. :) The federal government does not prohibit any firearm specification, except machine guns made by unlicensed persons after May 1986. I can chop down a rifle or shotgun barrel to any length I want; no license or permit needed. It only requires a tax and routine ATF approval as long as I live in a state that does not prohibit it.

Ranb
 
Actually, in most cases I can show a 90 pound woman how to handle a situation with a 200 pound attacker, yes. Lack of imagination isn't an excuse.

And the disabled? Do you teach the use of firearms for self defense? Aren't firearms an acceptable means of defense?

Ranb
 
Okay, that's just false.


Ok, I should be the one supplying information that non-firing guns rarely have collectors value in the USA, but I do not have it at my fingertips right now. What information do you have that shows non-firing guns with collector's value are not rare compared to functioning guns? I am not saying they do not exist, I am claiming that working guns with collector's value far outnumber valuable non-firing guns.

Ranb
 
Really? What are some other purposes of a firearm?

I guess the Olympics are not shown in Folsom? So are those guys and gals who spend a significant amount of their free time putting holes in paper are wasting their time?

I feel sorry for those on the Olympic shooting team in Great Britain who need to go abroad to practice because their sport is illegal at home.

Ranb
 
I guess the Olympics are not shown in Folsom? So are those guys and gals who spend a significant amount of their free time putting holes in paper are wasting their time?

I feel sorry for those on the Olympic shooting team in Great Britain who need to go abroad to practice because their sport is illegal at home.

Ranb


God I want one of the Kimbers the American team uses SOOO BAD!!!
gonk.gif
 
My Arsenal at the moment:

1 Brown Bess Tower Musket.
1 Hawkins Muzzle loading Rifle (as shown in "Jeremiah Johnson)
1 Three Banded Enfield Rifle Musket (as shown in "GLory")
1 Flintlock Pistol
1.Navy Colt Cap and Ball Revolver
1 Colt .45 "Peacemaker" revolver (as shown in endless Westerns)
1 Winchester Level Action rifle (as shown in "WInchester 73" and "Shaun Of the Dead")
One Scattergun for Bird Hunting.
Except for the Scatter gun, used mainly for Historical Reenactments and Target Competion.
Please explain to me why these weapons in my possesion pose a threat to society.
 
Please explain to me why these weapons in my possesion pose a threat to society.

It is because, "that when a gun comes into play in any situation other than shooting targets then the implication is that the person holding the gun intends for whomever it gets pointed at to die." Not my words, someone elses; on this forum, in this thread. I'm not claiming that the above person really believes that your hobby is a threat to another person's life, but some others certainly think so.

Ranb
 

Back
Top Bottom