• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged I killed Duality and Uncertainty for a Theory of Everything

A lie about what he lied about: "Dark matter is unobservable"

We can not directly observe dark matter. Stop pretending.
13 February 2020 pittsburghjoe: A lie about what he lied about: "Dark matter is unobservable".

An ignorant delusion that dark matter is not directly observable. Dark matter is currently as directly observable as stars. We observe stars because they emit light. We observe dark matter because it "emits" gravity. We have not detected stars (and never will) or dark matter yet in labs but that does not mean stars or dark matter do not exist.
 
A deluded "Digital is the same as Holographic" lie

Digital is the same as Holographic
13 February 2020 pittsburghjoe: A deluded "Digital is the same as Holographic" lie as anyone with a dictionary or knowledge of English knows.

Digital is ... digital (of fingers in his head?)! The Holographic principle is that a "description of a volume of space can be thought of as encoded on a lower-dimensional boundary to the region". Holographic images are usually analog.
 
May be stupidity about 13 February 2020 pittsburghjoe: A lie about what he lied about: "Dark matter is unobservable". This is the real world fact that we can observe dark matter (his first lie) and that we may be able to detect dark matter in labs.

Really deluded crackpots have the stupidity that directly detected in labs is a requirement in science. It is a nice to have. We have never had a star in the lab so according to them stars do not exist :eek:!
 
Last edited:
Do we have proof decohered condenced wave packets are still waves?

I want the math of a decohered "wave" attempting to tunnel. You get it by letting the wave functions cancel out leaving you with a single state. The holographic mass of a wave (not a particle in duality) ..is not physical. It doesn't have to answer to forces like a particle in duality.

Does a matter wave travel like a corkscrew?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zirkularpolarisation.gif
 
450 items of ignorance, fantasy, delusion, by pittsburghjoe since 4 September 2019

438 items of ignorance, fantasy, delusion, by pittsburghjoe since 4 September 2019

13 February 2020 pittsburghjoe: A lie that he shows that his ignorant gibberish matches the real world
... 10 more items
13 February 2020 pittsburghjoe: A deluded "Digital is the same as Holographic" lie as anyone with a dictionary or knowledge of English knows.
 
A demented "]Do we have proof decohered condenced wave packets are still waves?" que

Do we have proof decohered condenced wave packets are still waves? ..
14 February 2020 pittsburghjoe: A demented "]Do we have proof decohered condenced wave packets are still waves?" question.

A wave packeta collection of waves by definition - the word wave is in his question :jaw-dropp! No waves = no wave packet!
A delusion of imaginary "decohered condenced" wave packets.
 
Lies about my posts which are useful and helpful

Everything you have said has been completely useless and unhelpful.
14 February 2020 pittsburghjoe: Lies about my posts which are useful and helpful.
Most people will read pittsburghjoe's posts and see that he is writing ignorant and deluded nonsense. for those few people who do not see how deluded the posts are, there are my posts that often explain how they are deluded.

Some of his posts have the actually insane delusion that a theory of everything is an incoherent sentence :eye-poppi!
Some of his posts are just gibberish stringing together scientific words that he obviously does not understand.
Some of his posts are his personal fantasies with no physical foundation.
Some of his posts are blatant lies about textbook science.
Most of this ignorance, fantasy, delusions and lies are repeated again and again even after the science is given to him. Thus: 450 items of ignorance, fantasy, delusion, by pittsburghjoe since 4 September 2019 :jaw-dropp!
It is this denial of the real world that makes it useless to try to help him and thus I and probably other poster here are not doing so. He has shown himself to be just another Internet physics crackpot who refuses to learn even what physics is!
 
Last edited:
Is there proof that a decohered wave is still a wave? I know I said "wave", but I suspect it isn't anymore at that point. The quantum field still has influence on the now physical particle. It doesn't have the ability to perform quantum weirdness events.
 
The "wave is not a wave" insanity for a wave rather than a wave packet

14 February 2020 pittsburghjoe: The "wave is not a wave" insanity for a wave rather than a wave packet.
A green wave is a wave. A square wave is a wave. A "decohered" wave is a wave. etc.

What makes his question insane is he has no idea what "decohered" means for a wave. Coherence has a meaning in physics for multiple wave sources. Reducing coherence is making the wave from the separate sources less in step.
He may be trying to express yet another ignorant delusion about quantum decoherence which is the reduction of coherence between different quantum states.
 
Last edited:
Nope, there are cases for it to only be a wave. If it is going to make it from point A to B without decoherence it will remain only a wave until the final panel.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom